this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22063 readers
10 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ravheim@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I grew up and was quite active in the UMC. Seeing stories like this give me some hope that the church is finding it's way again after the evangelicals took over. The evangelicals seem to be the ones that are leaving, btw. I left long ago and consider myself non-religious due to the evangelical movement that's grown so powerful these days.

I decided to look up the church's position and found it here: [https://www.umc.org/en/content/ask-the-umc-what-is-the-churchs-position-on-homosexuality] Still leaves a lot to be desired, but it's a step in the right direction. Albeit very small step.

This comment section really gives me pause though. You don't have to agree with someone's spiritual or religious views, but you should respect them. Now, if those religious views are hateful and encourage violence, then yes by all means call them on their BS. I'll hold the bull-horn for you and have your back if things go sideways. But the hate and anger in this comment section was aimed at the people that are trying to change the church for the better, not those that left because they hate the LGBTQ+ folks. Seems folks forgot the humans.

[–] ArcticCircleSystem@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I may ask, why do you think evangelicals maintain their position on homosexuality? Any idea where it came from? ~Strawberry

[–] ravheim@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A literal interpretation of the old testament bible. And the idea that a nearly 3000 year old collection of verbal teachings by a mostly tribal society is still applicable today. There are a lot of rules there that if they followed would lead to some hilarity. Some that would lead to a lot of heartache too. [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_actions_prohibited_by_the_Bible] The evangelicals ignore the parts of the new testament they don't like and the new covenant that Jesus represents. Read that as they ignore the parts about love and compassion for your fellow human; living with grace and kindness.

[–] ObiGynKenobi@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A literal interpretation of a mistranslation.

[–] ravheim@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Multiple intentional mistranslations. Added to that cherry picking which gospels you want to add because some of them contradict the religion you're trying to build.

[–] ObiGynKenobi@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the "apocrypha". One would think an ideology supernaturally delivered to anointed individuals by an omnipotent and omniscient deity wouldn't have so many contradictions and texts left on the cutting room floor.