this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
464 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32353 readers
397 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PunchEnergy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which is no sugar. So wheres the Problem?

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't like it when my tea is sweet :(

[–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So then buy unsweetened tea. We already have a term for things that aren't sweet.

https://www.amazon.com/Pure-Leaf-Unsweetened-Brewed-Calories/dp/B015Z6WJDY/

I seriously don't understand why you want the "no sugar added" label to have factually incorrect requirements.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I want flavored tea that doesn't have sweet but all the bottles are sweet :(

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Them’s fighin’ words

-the entire state of NC

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every time I go south I forget this and always end-up with disgustingly sweet tea at restaurants. I always get one huge gulp then want to vomit. lol

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I live in Arkansas and prefer non-sweet. I can't imagine not specifying.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

It's okay, their toes will fall off if they try to chase us. /s

[–] LaVacaMariposa@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No sugar added should mean no sweeteners added, but that's not the case unfortunately.

[–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

No sugar added usually just means it's full of sugar originally found in the product. A "no sugar added" apple juice will still have an insanely unhealthy amount of sugar.

I don't know why you think it should mean no sweeteners. (most) sweeteners are categorically not sugar. If you want something not sweet, the label you're looking for is "unsweetened".

Besides, sugar is much worse for you than any artificial sweetener.

[–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Unsweetened" means no sweeteners added. "No sugar added" means no sugars, but maybe other sweeteners.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Unsweetened" is a subclass of "no sugar added" though, and so if you're really looking for "unsweetened", you still have to read the labels of all of the "no sugar added" products that chose that (more generic) label over the (more specific) "unsweetened" label.

[–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unsweetened is a subclass of "zero/no sugar". No sugar added is a completely separate thing.

No sugar added does not mean the product doesn't contain sugar or that it's not sweet. It only means there was no extra sugar added during the preparation. A "no sugar added" fruit juice, jam or even ketchup is still going to be sweet.

Something like pure maple suryp qualifies as no sugar added despite being 99% sugar.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I see what you're saying. I think I said this in another comment, but my goal is just to avoid (overly-)sweet foods. From that standpoint, "unsweetened" is ideal. But "no sugar added" for something that's naturally somewhat sweet (such as tomato paste) is also acceptable. If I were to pick up tomato paste that said "no sugar added" but did have artificial sweeteners, I'd be horrified. So I guess the terminology is more straightforward if you're avoiding sugar, but it's less useful if you're avoiding sweetness.

[–] s6original@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)