this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
1239 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

10652 readers
4558 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1239
Knowledge (mander.xyz)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 

Totally selected the wrong meme for the old title, but here we are.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I would, but now there's free LLM's that can do what I do literally for free and 1000x faster.

Past that, I have no marketable skills that a modern LLM doesn't also have, and better. I very much doubt I'm alone in this. Between now and say, two to five years tops, my employers will know it too.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 64 points 7 months ago (4 children)

File LLMs under "confidently doing it wrong". They don't know anything, they just parrot what was scraped off the internet

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Not disagreeing, but what does that help the thousands who will still lose their jobs regardless?

[–] Spike@feddit.de 8 points 7 months ago

People who know whats good and wont settle for mediocrity are out there. Market to them!

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

Just wait it out ..... being confidently wrong only works for a limited time until people realize it isn't working at all .... and the point at which people, especially corporate leaders, realize it isn't working is the point when they start seeing that they aren't making money any more.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Irrigation, mechanization, computers, internet, web search and now LLMs destroyed jobs but also created new ones, often more qualified and better paid if you learned to use the new tech. Why would this suddenly change today? Just learn to use it like you learned to use web search and adapt to the jobs evolutions that are coming from it.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Jokes on you, OP's job is parroting things that were scraped off the internet!

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but when I do it it's funny because it's a reference

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 0 points 7 months ago

Ah! Modern journalism?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Funnily enough, that’s also what a large portion of people do too, just regurgitate stuff without comprehending its meaning.

Lots of people get ~~phds~~ masters and bachelors while just being able to answer textbook questions, start questioning them to get them to apply that knowledge and it’s just air. It’s literally what people call “book smart” vs “street smart”.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

start questioning them to get them to apply that knowledge

That's literally what people do to get a PhD, they defend their thesis by answering a bunch of questions from professors about it. That's the point of a PhD.

It has nothing to do with "street smarts" unless the degree is from the "School of Hard Knocks".

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry maybe not phds specifically, but masters and bachelors definitely. Lots of certificates and qualifications require just written tests, no practical testing.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but you specifically said "PhD". Your comment sounds like you just don't know what a doctorate is.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

And I made a mistake, it happens and I even admitted it and provided the proper examples.

Very few qualifications require practical testing, if you want to circle a discussion on the one I made a mistake on in choosing that’s on you.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Ok, but you said "lots of people get PhDs" without being able to defend their ideas. It's literally the opposite.

No one gets a PhD without being able to defend their ideas from very hard questions. You are 100% incorrect. Your dissertation defense did not go well and we cannot award you the degree of "Doctorate of Commenting".

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And I admitted I made a mistake and corrected it.

What do you think you’re proving by continuing to argue after I admitted my mistake, corrected it and explained it? Lmfao.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago

At what point are you satisfied after someone admits their mistake? Are ya just going to stay hung up on the fact that someone said something incorrect? Do you move on?

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I knew plenty of people that also do just that

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

I’m in the same boat as you. Nothing I can do can’t be done by an LLM or someone with Google. I fucking hate my job but realistically I won’t find anything better.

[–] wellee@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

large language model, e.g. Bing Copilot or Google Bard

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Learned language model- it’s the technical term for things like ChatGPT or bing search. They basically predict what comes next in a form of advanced auto-completion.

[–] starman@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

Large Language Model*

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml -3 points 7 months ago

We never needed LLMs to do that computationally.