this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
162 points (98.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers
467 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I imagine all plastics will be out of the question. I'm wondering about what ways food packaging might become regulated to upcycling in the domestic or even commercial space. Assuming energy remains a $ scarce $ commodity I don't imagine recycling glass will be super practical as a replacement. Do we move to more unpackaged goods and bring our own containers to fill at markets? Do we start running two way logistics chains where a more durable glass container is bought and returned to market? How do we achieve a lower energy state of normal in packaging goods?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I wonder what happens to ceramic when it degrades over time. Does it become microscopic pieces?

[โ€“] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ceramic is made out of clay. So yes, microscopic dirt pieces

[โ€“] plasticcanliner@firefish.ranranhome.info 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run True but I just want to add the super pedantic point that they have started adding polymers to them! And for cooking materials, too! It's very yikesy to me

[โ€“] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 1 points 7 months ago

Presumably something made to be biodegradable would not include polymers

[โ€“] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 7 months ago

Ceramics can be eroded, for example hundred year old ceramics found on a beach will be slightly smoothed

If it's burried or otherwise protected from wind and water it will last very, very long times. Archaeologists find ancient ceramics from thousands of years ago, you can see ancient ceramics in museums

[โ€“] BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Well, in this hypothetical I'm proposing, there is no superheating involved- just printing, and being set to dry.

Ceramics get completely rigid, but relatively fragile in this state, which would be sufficient for a single use material, but if they're soaked for long enough, would dissolve.

The term is "Bone Dry" and specifically how to reclaim bone dry clay- that'd probably give you an idea on how it breaks down/dissolves.

there would be no straightforward way to get it back into print media unless there were recycling centers, but if one cleaned the food matter off well, in theory it could be standard clay people could use.

Imagine collecting food cup clay and making it into bricks for public projects.

[โ€“] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As a former ceramic artist I would be very wary of this solution. Bone dry clay is way too fragile to survive transportation unless very carefully packed. Potentially an air dry paper clay could work but even then it isn't very durable.

As you mentioned in your comment, the minute bone dry clay touches liquid it starts to slake down. So you would end up with clay mush in your food and the structure would start to fall apart.

Additionally, silica dust from bone dry clay is really bad for you. Probably not very likely to effect the occasional consumer but people interacting with it often would be at an elevated risk for lung issues.

[โ€“] BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, I was under the impression that clay was inert when ingested.

The transportation and dust would be lessened from the printing process if it were done by the individual, but if what you say is true, then the whole idea is worthless unless there's an alternative material available.

[โ€“] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most clay is likely safe to ingest. However the willingness of customers to ingest clay may vary and the quantity of clay may impart a flavor on the product.

I'm also not sold on the printing process. Ceramic is strongest when the clay platelets are aligned and in a 3d printing process there are many layers. Each of the layers introduces a weak point that is likely to crack in drying or use. Ceramics already have quite efficient methods for production primarily slipcasting and extrusion. In these methods pieces are formed without "joins".

I'm also not convinced printing it at home would be feasible for mass production/adoption.

That being said it is an interesting idea. I think you could probably make single use, unglazed, low-fire ware like Indian Bhar. Which could get recycled into aggregate. Firing adds emissions back into the process though and I'm not sure where that ranks compared to something with an existing supply chain like paper alternatives.

[โ€“] BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I am talking about though is SLA printing though- resin printing, but without the resin, basically.
Which is why I think its more feasible than just extrusion printing on principle. The layers are incredibly thin, with no extrusion involved, and no exposure to air until well after the layers are formed.

[โ€“] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Hmm, that's interesting. I'd be curious in how that would be cured and how the layers would stick together. Plaster might be interesting too since it has a faster setting period than clay.