this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
-32 points (34.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2200 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I don't know where USA Today found these people.

Kristian Mansel, 23 said she's willing to see a Trump victory if it means Biden and Democratic Party learn a lesson. She's mad Biden and Democrats have failed to protect reproductive rights or wipe out student loans.

"It's just there's too many strikes against him and the Democratic Party at this point in general," said Mansel, a University of Memphis student who considers herself liberal.

Has she paid any attention at all to what each party is trying to do?

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know where USA Today found these people.

Same place as the Bernie Bros who voted for Trump instead of Hilary Clinton, giving the USA 3 more conservative Supreme Court Justices.

You know, to stick it to the Democrats.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If Democrats want their votes, Democrats need to change. Democrats would rather lose.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

If Bernie can't beat Hillary Clinton in 2016 primaries when only leftists+moderates are voting, why the fuck would he win in the general election when we start including right and far-rifght people in America?

The fact is, the Democratic Party primaries are the best for a far-left person like Bernie. (Much like how far-right candidates have the biggest advantage during Republican primaries). If you can't move the votes in the primary, its impossible to win during the general election.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If progressives are so insignificant that the party can ignore them, you don't get to blame them for Clinton's loss. She was so useless as a candidate that she had to be carried across the line in the primaries by a party that argued in court that their primaries didn't need to be honest, and then forgot that she wasn't still being carried in the general.

Democrats would rather lose than debase themselves by appealing to the progressives they hold in utter contempt.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

If progressives are so insignificant that the party can ignore them, you don’t get to blame them for Clinton’s loss.

Yes I can. A significant minority of Bernie Bros are Sanders–Trump voters in both 2016 and 2020. LITERALLY participating and specifically supporting Trump.

Get out of here with the lack of responsibility.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A significant minority of Bernie Bros are Sanders–Trump voters in both 2016 and 2020.

Not significant enough to throw the election to Trump like you're claiming. But it beats admitting Clinton was shit, so you'll blame progressives for the loss she worked so hard to earn. To put a finer point on it, a greater percentage of Clinton supporters voted for McCain in 2008. They even formed a PAC to try to elect McCain.

Sanders supporters overwhelmingly voted for Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. Clinton supporters actively worked against Obama in 2008. Centrists got their third choice in 2008 and their second choice in 2016.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I'm Republican yo. You would have lost my vote if you put Sanders on the ticket.

To put a finer point on it, a greater percentage of Clinton supporters voted for McCain in 2008. They even formed a PAC to try to elect McCain.

And that's closer to my demographic. A lot of what McCain said (ex: the Ukrainian situation) has come true in the past decade, and has proven Obama to have been a naive fool.

You have my support, for now, as long as Republicans are dumbasses with Trump and as long as you keep a moderate (like Biden or Clinton) as your #1 ticket. But my support for Democrats may be somewhat temporary but its better than nothing.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Oh, that certainly explains why your positions are indistinguishable from centrists.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago

Eventually:

Kristian Mansel, 27, said she's glad that the Democrats have learned their lesson. "If I was still allowed to vote, I'd vote for them this time around."

[–] joedinkle@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

She was 15 in 2016. Probably not.