We are now over 200 users and may see significantly more in the coming days and weeks.
Our instance is new, Lemmy is new to most of us, and there just isn't the history needed to approach appropriate people and ask them to be moderators. So I'm taking applications instead.
It's worth noting that moderation has not been an issue for us so far, but I'd like to be prepared.
There are two types of moderators I'm looking for. It will be easier to find the first than the second, so for the first type I'm keen to find people not in an NZ time zone to cover times when NZ is normally asleep. The types I've after are:
- Remove obviously not allowed content:
- Trolling or posts obviously trying to cause harm
- Animal abuse
- CSAM
- Doxing and violations of court ordered name suppressions
- Any other content illegal in NZ
- Grey area moderators
Rather than just banning people that don't agree, I want to foster a community where everyone that wants to participate in good faith can, regardless of their views. I want this to be a community where everyone feels safe to be themselves. This can sound contradictory, but as long as we can attack ideas and not people, I believe there is a possibility to find our spot somewhere along this path.
This means that I don't want to ban users that use derogatory terms, I want it to be the start of a discussion about why they are hurtful. I don't want to remove racist comments, I want it to be the start of a discussion about what is and isn't acceptable in our community. If everyone acts in good faith, we should be able to have these discussions respectfully. If people start commenting in bad faith, then this may require more traditional moderator interventions (e.g. temporary or permanent bans, and potential removal of content). Note that moderator actions are transparent, and listed in the "Modlog" linked at the bottom of every page (this includes moderator actions on other instances to some extent).
So I am taking applications from people willing to facilitate the discussions for this second type of content. I recognise this is a much bigger burden than the first type, but I hope we will have some volunteers willing to give it a go.
If you want to volunteer, note that a requirement will be that you're willing and able to join a private Matrix chat room for moderators and admins where discussion can happen. This will be helpful for type 1 moderators too, in case there is confusion over what is type 1 content.
Note that moderators can be by community. If you're keen to moderate e.g. just !wellington@lemmy.nz, then please include this in your "application".
No need for life stories, just comment on your interest and, if relevant, some history or background of your moderation activities. You can reply here or DM me if you don't want to post publicly, either is fine.
The moment that this becomes a place where we spoon-feed an education to bad-faith actors, I'm out, and I imagine a lot of others will be too.
Don't be so concerned about losing bigots that you lose the people impacted by their rhetoric.
I have no concerns with removing bad-faith actors, and I hope I didn't give the impression that this would be allowed.
The approach you've described sounds extremely vulnerable to sealioning.
It's intended to be the opposite. A list of rules allows someone to point at them saying "I'm not breaking any rules, I'm just trying to have a polite discussion" while being anything but reasonable.
I encourage you to report anything that seems like sealioning. I'm open to changing the approach once we grow to a point that it's not sustainable, but right now this doesn't seem to be a problem (at least no one is reporting it).
You are giving that impression, yes.
I intend to do a post to make things clearer, but first I need to seek some feedback on what "clearer" looks like. Hopefully things will get clearer over the next few days.
This is clearer: https://mycrowd.ca/about
Thanks for that. It's also really long and detailed - so I guess you're right, it's very clear. But I really hope we don't need to break down rules to that level of detail.