this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)
NZ Politics
562 readers
1 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It really annoys me that these people broke into a museum, vandalised an exhibit, and got what they wanted.
Side note, they didn't break in. They did it in public during opening hours. They were charged with wilful damage not b&e.
Which made me wonder at the time... How on earth do you get away with bringing in all your gear and abseiling inside a public building with an angle grinder???
The Hi Viz gambit, I think. Act like you belong, and nobody will question you, at least for long enough to do what you need to do.
It's amazing how well that can work.
You'd think though in a building with as many rare/valuable artifacts as Te Papa... I mean, abseiling?? Then again I'm pretty sure one of the universities had people with clipboards load a ton of computers onto a truck and drive away, a few years ago.
In both cases, wouldn't suprise me if there was an insider.
It's a crapshoot sometimes, I've been absolutely grilled when turning up at a building, and other places nobody cares.
Heh in the context of this conversation I thought you were casually admitting to being a burglar for a second then... why do you turn up at buildings, is it a work thing?
Yes, I'm a tradie, and building occupants don't always know we're coming.
Makes sense. Back when I worked in a workplace we were never told about stuff like that. Security knew though.
Maori here.
Two schools of thought
1, this encourages repeat behavior. Im actually with you in this one.
2, were peaceful ways ever working?
I think they should change it, and have the person who damaged it pay for the replacement as they are so passionate about it.
I'm wondering what solution you'd like to see?
Looks like Paul Goldsmith told Te Papa to take it down.
The display was obviously misleading/ahistorical and it was a known problem, so paying to just put a new copy of a flawed display up again would be a problematic use of taxpayer funding.
People had been writing letters of complaint, petitions, trying to liaise with Te Papa for literally years about this problem with no action taken. There were also peaceful protests about it outside, pretty sure some of them got arrested in 2021 for gluing themselves to steps.
The whole thing could have been avoided.