NZ Politics

563 readers

1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Dave

RaoulDuke

Is NZ bringing in 'Indonesian coal every month to keep the lights on'? (www.rnz.co.nz)

submitted 7 months ago by Dave to c/politics

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Analysis: Burning less coal to make electricity helped New Zealand achieve its biggest official annual drop in planet-heating gases since records started in 1990.

The same week those figures came out, Resources Minister Shane Jones told Morning Report New Zealand should develop more of its own coal, rather than importing "dirty" coal from Indonesia.

Jones earlier told Parliament that opposition MPs turned a blind eye while New Zealand imported Indonesian coal "every month, to keep the lights on."

While it's true Genesis Energy - owner of the country's only coal-fired station - burns coal to run its Huntly generators, it last year reported that its last shipment of coal had arrived in July 2022.

Government figures show New Zealand was a net exporter of coal every year since records began, except 2021 - a dry year for hydro, coupled with an unexpected shortage on Genesis' gas field.

That was the year Huntly used record amounts of imported Indonesian coal, pushing up the climate impact of the whole country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] deadbeef79000 6 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Like all headlines that ask a question the answer is "no", other wise the headline would state that fact.

[–] Dave 5 points 7 months ago (6 children)

With these political analysis pieces from RNZ where they investigate a claim from a politician, some of them the answer is actually yes, what they said is close enough to true. But it's pretty rare, to say the least.

[–] deadbeef79000 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Sometines yeah, but all headline questions are pure click bait.

"Minister's claims of imported Indonesian coal false" is the appropriate headline.

I'd even argue that the country of origin is irrelevant and serves only to stoke some anti-asia sentiment.

[–] liv 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah nah, country of origin is important.

To people interested in the environment the phrase "Indonesian coal" tells us two things really quickly.

Firstly, that it comes from an industry that's deforesting, killing orangutans etc. The Indonesian mining sector is open cast, meaning they tear up the rainforest to get at the coal. Obviously you can't remediate that, not that they try hard, and it pollutes, causes flooding, and destroys livelihoods as well.

Secondly, Indonesia's coal is sub-bituminous. That's a crappy low grade kind of coal that releases way more greenhouse gasses than high grade coal.

Edit: Shane Jones might well be trying to use racist overtones like you and @Dave@lemmy.nz said, I'm just saying calling it "Indonesian coal" isn't inherently race whistling.

[–] deadbeef79000 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Thank you for that detail. I was aware that coal's qualities differ from region to region (hence Huntly not burning NZ coal). But was ignorant of what regions' qualities are.

In that context yeah, country or origin is an effective short-hand.

load more comments (3 replies)