this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
1414 points (97.8% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29077 readers
8 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CascadeDismayed@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The world is ready to fully transition away from that cancerous company.

[–] assa123@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It started out great at the times of Aaron Swartz, but just as with people, cancer sometimes hits. Anyway, it influenced projects like lemmy for which I'm thankful.

[–] CascadeDismayed@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes I'm aware of the history. The only way to kill cancer is excise it. Lemmy realistically can't take a full migration from Reddit but that needs to change. I too am super grateful. Part of me wonders if this platform could end the same way but given it's decentralised nature, I highly doubt it. Reddit was open source once. I really want this to succeed. Seize the means of communication.

[–] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

One thing that worries me is Lemmy's dedication to non-advertisement funding. Lemmy will never be able to handle a ton of people without money for server space and bandwidth. I hate ads as much as anyone, but there are ways to do it that aren't intrusive or toxic or damage your integrity.

[–] CascadeDismayed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The privacy movement can't sell out to private entities or all bets are off again, I think no advertisements is wholly nessasary. I think taking out Reddit is much more achievable than many people think. Yes it will take some money and resources.

[–] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but where is that money going to come from?

[–] CascadeDismayed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The money is coming from the community, which is why progress is slow. People don't have much money. It doesn't mean we should sell the soul of the project for a quick buck. Rome wasn't built in a day.

[–] zwubb@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rome wasn't built for free either, we need some sort of financial backup. Even if it isn't advertising something needs to be in place.

[–] CascadeDismayed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but this place is electronic and exists in an aether. It's possible to do at minimal costs.

[–] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's no such thing as the aether. It exists on other people's computers, which they want to be paid to use.

[–] emcon_delta@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

As more and more people host their own federated instances it won't be as big of a problem as it was for web 2.0 legacy sites like reddit. The Fediverse really is the future.

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are ways to do advertising that works and is not annoying (or at least less annoying). Context advertising are ads that are directly related to the subject matter of interest. For example, ads from companies that are in the business of meeting the needs of the boatbuilding community would be welcome or at least tolerated in a boatbuilding community. Those same ads shown to a programming community would be less welcome, even if there happens to be significant shared membership.

For example, the paper magazine "Small Craft Advisor" recently transitioned to online only via Substack. It didn't take long for subscribers to actually complain about the loss of advertising and SCA had to respond with self-promotion articles from former advertisers.

Context advertising requires no user profiling, no user tracking, and no data collection. "Oh, you sell epoxy (or sails or plans)? Well here is a community (as distinct from a user profile) that is likely looking for what you sell and probably already discussing products in your line of business."

[–] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a site I am familiar with that was determined to not have intrusive ads and actually created a side business of creating ads for its advertisers that it would find acceptable on the site, which consisted of a still image of given dimensions, and a link.

When you say no data collection, you mean no personalized data collection, right? Obviously they would want to know how many times the ad was clicked.

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

That sounds like the kind of thing I envision.

Yes, no personalized data collection. Both sides of the ad transaction would need to track something if the placement had some kind of impressions or click-through payment system. It's been a while since I've managed a website, but I think most of that can be handled with pretty basic logging that has existed since before micro-targeted advertising was even conceived.

For a simple placement contract like we have with what few newspapers remain, the ad supplier could assess the value of the placement for themselves using standard referrer logs. Not paying its way? Don't renew the placement.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Open source and decentralized are two different things, as long as it's just a bunch of independent server instances which are small enough each to handle the traffic load you can't really buy that out.

The question is if it'll take off, more or less.

[–] CascadeDismayed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The question is if it’ll take off, more or less.

It already has.

[–] doctorplasmatron@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

we're here aren't we (grin). Looking forward to seeing how this plays out for sure.

[–] doctorplasmatron@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

yes, its origins were great, it's finale is not so great. I suspect if Aaron were alive he'd be livid. I also think reddit's demise might be the intended outcome, like BCG is at the helm or somesuch.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unfortunately they aren't since the ones who cared couldn't be bothered for more than two days.

[–] CascadeDismayed@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The death of Reddit will be a slow bleeding process. Expect waves. Not floods.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

I think it will be more like the tide moving out slowly ... no one will really notice and the CEO and owners will keep telling everyone everything will be fine even as their ship sits beached on a sandbar and the water will never return.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Here's a thread where subreddit mods are announcing their subs going indefinitely dark: https://old.reddit.com/r/ModCoord/comments/148ks6u/indefinite_blackout_next_steps_polling_your/