NZ Politics

562 readers

1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Dave

RaoulDuke

Official admits new school lunch model unlikely to be as nutritious due to cost (www.rnz.co.nz)

submitted 5 months ago by Dave to c/politics

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Ministry of Education official has admitted the alternative model for the government's free school lunch programme is unlikely to be as nutritious as the previous programme, RNZ understands.

The comments came in a webinar hui between the Ministry of Education and intermediate and high school principals, earlier this month.

Principal Sheree Garton, from Levin Intermediate School, asked a question about protein and carbohydrates required in the new meals - and was told the meals would not have the same nutrition standards and would be very unlikely to meet the same nutritional quality as the previous meals because of the cost - though nutrition would be a factor in looking for a new major supplier.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] deadbeef79000 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"We're sorry, tax cuts for our buddies means your children have to go hungry."

"We're sorry, tax cuts for our buddies means disabled people don't get the support they need".

"We're sorry, tax cuts for our buddies means people who can't work can't get slightly more assistance than last year."

"We're sorry, tax cuts for our buddies means redressing Treaty violations have to wait another few decades."

I wouldn't piss on this government if they were on fire.

[–] Dave 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The thing that stood out to me is the $12B in borrowing. Here's our budget, where we need to borrow an additional $12B and push out the return to surplus to way past when Labour's 2023 budget forecast it.

Also here is $15B in tax cuts. We are paying for it with cost cutting, the $12B in borrowing is for something else.

[–] Rangelus 4 points 5 months ago

Exactly. The fact that they went ahead with these tax cuts shows they cannot be trusted to be 'fiscally responsible'