this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)
NZ Politics
562 readers
1 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Does it sound to you like he's got two things confused - PPP with commercial interests (hello Chinese funding) and user pays as the same thing?
I suspect the tolls are a necessary part of the partnership. In other countries, you get things like having a company fund the development in return for being able to collect tolls for 10 years (for example). If you didn't have tolls, how would the company get their money back from the investment? And if that money comes from the government, they might as well have just paid for it with taxpayer dollars to start with.
So I get why tolls are needed. But now you're just charging people twice to use the road.
I would argue that if you put a toll on an existing road you are charging people twice, but not if its on a new one. It's a great thing for things like the northern expressway.
My big thing is why even get private involved? If there's profit to be made keep it - country's running out of money and productive assets, use it.
Yes I guess that's true to some extent. But I don't really get why we need three separate user pays systems.
Because the parties have nothing to gain from making the country money, but there may be some nice donations coming their way if they make money for some private companies.