524
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

From a hotel in Kyoto to a sandwich joint in Edinburgh, the world is becoming hostile toward Israelis who are learning that a vacation won't shield them from the Gaza war.

During the nine months of war the Israeli tourist experience abroad has been marked by fears of antisemitism and efforts to avoid pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

According to reports by Israeli media and posts online, some of those worries have recently turned real for a number of Israeli tourists.Anecdotal incidents at touristic locations around the world are making it clear that even though there is no official policy of excluding Israelis, that is sometimes the situation on the ground.

An especially bumpy week began on June 17 at the Material Hotel in Kyoto, Japan, when an Israeli named Alex was informed that his reservation had been canceled due to the allegations of Israeli war crimes in Gaza. The Material told Alex that it was "not able to accept reservations from persons we believe might have ties to the Israeli army," as reported by Israeli website Ynet.

The story made the rounds on social media, produced a stern protest letter from Israel's ambassador in Tokyo, and led to a rebuke by the Kyoto municipality that the hotel had breached Japanese business law and must ensure that such a transgression won't happen again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 21 points 2 years ago

Yes it is.

The Israel government does not exist in a vacuum. Its Israelis running the government, Israelis committing war crimes, and its Israelis who should be held accountable for their actions.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

"The American government does not exist in a vacuum. It's Americans running the government, Americans committing war crimes, and it's Americans who should be held responsible for their actions."

[-] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As long as you're consistent. Also make sure to replace the country name with pretty much every large country, since they all commit war crimes. Something about glass houses and throwing stones applies.

[-] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Nah actually I won't do that. The USA is special for its status as the hegemon and for the amount and viciousness of the atrocities it committed to uphold that status throughout history. It's up there right next to British and Roman empires and maybe the Mongols.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Don't mistake the inability to commit war crimes at the scope the US does with an unwillingness to.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"You forget Poland!"

— George W. Bush

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Where do you live?

[-] Yen@feddit.uk 20 points 2 years ago

You are not making the point you think you are.

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So logical fallacies are valid to you?

[-] ytg@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

Its Israelis running the government

Elected government. Have you heard of majority rule? The government needs only 50% + 1 votes to get in power. Also consider the low voter turnout.

Also consider the low voter turnout.

Isn't that an argument for blaming them? Their govt is ducked and they can't be bothered to vote

[-] ytg@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe? But then you’d have to blame Arab citizens of Israel (however they may identify) the most. They make up a fifth of the population only about 15% of voters (in the last election). There’s a comparison to be drawn to the “not voting for Biden” crowd[1].

[1] - It is different, as Biden is too moderate for some people, but that’s not an issue with Arab parties in Israel. It’s more a feeling that, even with a high seat count, nothing can be done, which may or may not be true.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago

Oh, so civilian Palestinians are therefore wholly responsible for Hamas attacks in October and suffer reasonable consequences?

Civilians are NOT RESPONSIBLE, I can't believe I have to explain that.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 2 years ago

Gaza isn’t a democracy and the average Palestinian wasn’t even born yet when Hamas gained power.

So no.

In a democracy, where the people have the say, they have the responsibility for who they elect to represent and act for them.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In a perfect democracy, 49% of people can be strictly against the government and its actions, yet you suggest they are responsible for it.

Many Israelis and Jews have denounced the attacks, and should not be responsible for what happens.

[-] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Reminder that the current israeli government got only 49% of the votes. They lost the popular vote so to speak.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
524 points (95.2% liked)

News

39029 readers
2650 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS