[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

ICE aren't police

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

lmfao a western-backed "freedom index" is not a substitution for media literacy, nor does it excuse you from providing literally any material evidence to support your argument.

Also, do you want to explain why Israel is ranked at 112; 50 places above Venezuela and Palestine; and why Saudi fuckin Arabia is right there between VZ and PA? Seems to me like this "freedom index" doesn't correlate very well with democracy or human rights, much less evidence-based journalism or state transparency.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago
  1. What evidence do you have to justify your assertion that Ukrainian culture, language, and identity were targets of destruction?

  2. In this case, yes??? If we're setting out to prove intent to commit genocide, both the actions and rhetoric of the accused are pretty important evidence. You don't really get one without the other, the rhetoric is necessary to justify the actions to the people who will ultimately have to commit them.

Recognizing statehood is a pretty base level of recognizing the humanity and sovereignty of those that occupy it, which the USSR would not have done for Ukraine if their intent was to wipe out the Ukrainian culture and national identity and replace it with Russian identity. As evidenced by Israel, genocidaires prefer their victims as defenseless and disorganized as possible. Colonizers don't recognize borders on land they seek to colonize. Israel has denied and undermined Palestinian statehood at every stop, literally rewriting history to support their narrative, because allowing Palestinians to have a state with any level of recognized sovereignty would be wholly counter-productive to Israel's colonial project.

So how do you explain Ukraine being granted statehood within the Soviet Union? If, by your account, the USSR went to all this trouble to brutally cleanse the land of Ukrainians and their culture by means of starvation, why did they then just leave the land to be looked after by a Ukrainian state? Why did they give up on this ambition for Russia to occupy Ukraine? Where else have you ever seen a colonizer just up and leave a colony, still mostly occupied by natives, and grant those natives full statehood in their union??? What you're claiming just makes no sense when put into greater context.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago

America only entered WWII to take a piece of the pie.

It was pretty clear at that point that if the US didn't enter, the USSR would take the win and have the chance to bring more Nazi-occupied territories into their union. Many US corporations were even collaborating with the Nazis, the US made carve outs to prevent factories in Nazi territories being bombed, as we already know the US profits immensely from war, and then after the war they shipped all the Nazi scientists and generals into high places in government. They weren't exactly sworn enemies. Defeating the Nazis was not as high a priority as limiting the influence of the USSR. Their participation was always cynical, which might be why it seemed "counter-productive" at times.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 21 points 10 months ago

I wonder... do we have any kind of cablegore or tech gore community around here?

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, actually. I think it would unironically be better to get all your calories and nutrition from bread, cheese, and sausage than to have a diet consisting of any variety of high-sugar, ultra-processed food.

Also breakfast is completely optional and its promotion as "the most important meal of the day" is a scam to sell more cereal, milk, and eggs. I will die on that hill.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago

lmfao the notion that the feds would try to crush socialism by directly inviting us to study forces that have successfully fought off the US military is so funny to me.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

I'd say that's a ridiculous choice and it's time to organize with the masses against the system that presented it to us; rather than undermine that effort by treating the system as legitimate and shaming others for not seeing the candidates and their futures the way I did.

Hand me two cups of shit, I still have free will to throw them back in your face. The system can force feed if it wants but you won't see me voluntarily picking a shit cup and eating shit.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

He really just does it as a hobby. Love of the game.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

It's estimated that about 50-75% of people don't have an internal monologue at all.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Also lumping in deaths from Israeli bombs in that figure (re: Hannibal directive)

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

There was a kid that shit his pants at my middle school. Left a little nugget that slid out of his basketball shorts in the hallway. I guess there was also some on his seat which nobody noticed until a girl in the next class sat in it.

view more: next ›

causepix

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago