this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
269 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22083 readers
86 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ffmike@beehaw.org 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Looks like only available in one restaurant for now, but it's a start.

"For one thing, cultivated meat is not vegan or vegetarian." -> I know some vegans who would disagree with that, on the grounds that no animal cruelty or slaughter is involved. I suspect there will be a fair bit of debate on this as cultivated meat becomes more widespread. I would guess just like we've already got "I'm a vegetarian who eats fish" we'll end up with "I'm a vegan who does/doesn't eat cultivated meat."

You might want to cross-post this to https://beehaw.org/c/food too.

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I know some vegans who would disagree with that

I definitely would!

Usually, the reason people go vegan is to try to reduce (hopefully eliminate) animal suffering, and/or to reduce green house gas emissions from animal farming.

Cultivated meat deals with the first, and, depending on how it's produced, can probably entirely avoid the second as well.

I don't know the process in detail, but I would also imagine that cultivated meat is no more sourced from animals than a plant that was fertilized with animal dung, and that would still be considered vegan.

[–] ffmike@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There are some analyses out there that suggest cultivated meat will actually be worse for the climate than animals - for example https://www.ucdavis.edu/food/news/lab-grown-meat-carbon-footprint-worse-beef

Of course the cultivated meat startups disagree: https://www.npr.org/2022/11/21/1138371310/a-taste-of-lab-grown-meat

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I was going to say, all the articles and science I saw on lab meat previously had it consuming far, far less resources than the traditional beef industry. Definitely going to read more about it but I'm still team lab meat for now.

Edit:

"But in a preprint, not yet peer-reviewed, researchers at the University of California..." That's not a good start to their point.

The comments on that preprint by another expert also don't seem promising on their conclusions of lab grown.

I'll believe it's worse than traditional beef when more science substantiates that view. This article isn't that.

[–] TechyDad@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago

Even if cultivated meat was initially bad for the environment, I'd guess that it would be easy to minimize it's environmental impact versus traditional meat. There's only so much you can do to stop cows from belching CO2. However, a factory making vats of cultured meat could install pollution controls to reduce their emissions.

I'd definitely like to see peer reviewed studies backing everything up, but my guess is that cultivated meat will on par with or be better for the environment than traditional meat and will only get better.

[–] ffmike@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah so far it seems to be battling experts. UC Davis is a big agriculture/animal science school. On the other hand I don't trust the lab meat industry's own experts either. Hoping at some point to see a credible neutral analysis.

I've read it, and there's already two issues:

  • Not peer reviewed, so more margin of error
  • It says that it will only be worse if the stuff needed to make lab grown meat is purified at pharmaceutical levels; if the stuff is food grade then the claim begins falls apart.
[–] Woovie@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I think it's odd to even compare. One is a brand new industry, the other is a hundreds of year old process in terms of learning how to make it efficient. Over time, I have no doubt lab-grown can out-carbon footprint actual cattle raising.

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was an interesting read, thanks for the link!

But yeah, I had no idea it was so much worse for the environment. But it seems there's still the possibility it will be better one day, so I hope for the best. I guess in the meantime I'll stick with plant-based foods.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TechyDad@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not vegan, but I do keep Kosher and I'm sure there would be a huge debate in the Jewish community as to whether cultured meat was kosher.

Assuming that the animal that the original cells were taken from was Kosher (e.g. a chicken or a cow, not a pig), then would the cultured meat be Kosher? Would it not need to follow usual processes (specific slaughter techniques, salting and soaking the meat to remove blood, etc) if there was no animal/blood?

As cultured meat takes hold, there are going to be a lot of communities trying to take it into account. I'm sure there will be plenty of arguments as to the status of it as well. It should be interesting.

[–] ffmike@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FatCrab@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

This is a fascinating issue, though it looks like from that article that there is no consensus. I think I'd side on it being kosher and pareve though as Rabbi Lau asserts in that article. The root principle of kosher laws is food safety and kindness to animals (however misguided that is given the we now know schechting an animal is actually horrifically cruel to it). Moreover, the rule against mixing meat and dairy derives from the prohibition on boiling a calf in its mother's milk. Cultivated meat is the least cruel method of acquiring meat obviously and it has no mother, so kosher and pareve in my book.

[–] GeenVliegtuig@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I know at least one person that has preemptively rejected cultivated meat because it requires the death of an animal.

Even though they know that a single animal's death could then spare uncountable billions of future animals.

... does that make the chicken sampled for cultivation Chicken Jesus?

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're going to start rejecting things because even one animal died in the process of making them, you'd have to say goodbye to much of modern medicine too.

[–] HipHoboHarold@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would argue at some point they would need to reject modern living as a whole. Go build an A frame in the woods. Forage for berries and shit. Many aspects of the ways we live cause deaths. Like cars hitting animals. So if a single animal is too much, I have a feeling they should really be following that mindset.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leetnewb@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think that cultivated meat technically requires the death of an animal at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] borkcorkedforks@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the vegan is there for ethics then cultivated meat should be all good. More ethical than cheese or leather anyway.

Maybe some will complain about the source of the starter cells or something.

[–] JoGooD@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, there ain't much to complain except for health. After all, vegan isn't a diet, it is an ideology and if meat was the only healthy option, then it would be vegan to sometimes eat animal products and use products that caused harm to animal. In fact, I doubt there is such a thing as a totally vegan as the world is quite harsh. Because veganism is about minimising harm. Anyway, back to the diet, vegans generally believe that meat isn't a necessity for humans thus making this lab meat potentialy unhealthy (according to that belief).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] spoodbeest@beehaw.org 28 points 1 year ago

It’s pretty typical for a new product’s development to be inefficient until the processes are scaled, I wouldn’t read into it too much at the moment. Process improvements are happening at a ridiculously quick rate in this field; we’re talking on a weekly to monthly basis.

Keep in mind, too, that animal ag has a lot more money behind it than these folks, and similar to the oil companies they’re going to be spending buckets to slow the transition.

[–] kiddblur@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is awesome! I had no idea lab grown meat was so close to being viable. I currently eat meat (with some guilt), and I can't wait to get to the point where I can eat more ethically

[–] Laneus@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

agreed, regardless of whether or not it's ethical to raise animals for meat, they way we currently do it is an eldritch abomination where "cage free" chicken are kept so tightly packed they will peck each other to death unless debeaked, and where "cut from neighbors knife" is a common injury report at slaughterhouses.

[–] arcrust@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I've been about 50/50 with plant based beef and chicken. I'm extremely excited for this. Might be the final nail in the coffin for Big Meat

[–] anji@lemmy.anji.nl 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great news. I think we're still not quite there yet with cultivated meat, but it has great promise. Cultivated meat has the potential to be cheaper, far more environmentally friendly, obviously more ethical, and maybe even healthier. I hope it reaches full scale production with all these benefits in my lifetime.

[–] AnotherPerson@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hopefully, while not being harmful.

[–] spoodbeest@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can’t imagine it would be worse than traditional meat - no antibiotics, bits of bone, disease, etc. Bacterial contamination is the only concern I can think of, but that affects every category of food.

[–] AnotherPerson@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's where my mind goes as well. I am more so talking about unforseen concerns. Don't get me wrong. As soon as it is widely available and affordable I will totoaly eat it, I just worry there might be something we are missing. It's kind of a human tradition.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spoodbeest@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I can’t imagine it would be worse than traditional meat - no antibiotics, bits of bone, disease, etc. Bacterial contamination is the only concern I can think of, but that affects every category of food.

[–] darkfiremp3@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I am very curious what price they can get this to. If traditional chicken breast is $11 a pound and this is $20, it’s going to be rough. If it’s around the same or cheaper, it could do very well!

[–] that_one_guy@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I'm sure that it will initially cost a premium, before coming down in price as the technology matures. I'm also curious about the relative environmental impact that cultivated meat has versus raising livestock.

ETA: I found a study regarding cultured meat's environmental impact: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es200130u

According to this study, cultured meat is 7-45% more energy efficient, emits 78-96% less CO2, requires 82-96% less water, and occupies 99% less land than raising livestock.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

for fast-food purposes, the plant-based meats (Impossible, Beyond Meat) were generally able to get in the door at parity with ordinary meat from what i can tell. i'm not sure about in-grocery-store, though. they've also been racked by waning consumer interest, probably because they seem "faddish" for lack of better wording. that, i honestly think, is the biggest hurdle to cultivated meat--not price.

[–] TechyDad@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I buy Beyond Meat bricks for $8.99 a pound. That's pricey compared to regular beef, but I'm an outlier with pricing. I keep kosher at home and kosher meat is VERY expensive. Between the price and hassle (it requires separate pots/pans, plates, utensils, etc), I keep vegetarian at home. It's just cheaper and easier.

Beyond Meat lets me cook "beef" dishes for less than kosher beef would cost me and with more flexibility. (Tonight, we had pasta and Beyond Beef meatballs with cheese - a dish I couldn't make using kosher meat.)

There's still a market for products like Beyond Beef, but I agree that they'll need to hit "normal need" price levels before it really takes off.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] latte@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

as an omnivore dating a vegetarian who doesn't eat meat for ethical reasons i am so, so excited!!!!

[–] MingusKhan@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

I'm very interested to learn what combination of cells they used to hit certain flavors and how they developed the right network of cells to make the right texture. Is there a 'grain'? Will there be dark meat and white meat? So many questions! Can't wait to see if they end up making pulled pork down the road, haha.

[–] SmokeInFog@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

This is super exciting! Been waiting a long time for this

[–] Plus_a_Grain_of_Salt@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So they say the meat is 99% chicken cell, does anyone know what the 1% is? I'd just feel better knowing.

[–] 1st@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Typically that's more of a CYA move. If someone finds something that isn't chicken cell they could sue for false advertising, but if it's 100% chicken cell nobody can sue for saying it was 99%.

I was digging into this question and only found that it might be leftovers of whatever they feed the cells (which also no longer includes anything from live or harvested animals, which is cool). CYA covers that and so much more so I think you're right.

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know, and maybe I shouldn't comment, but my first thought was that it might be some sort of edible lattice that makes sure the chicken cells grow in a shape that looks vaguely filet-like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiny_electron@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

This is a huge a step forward!

[–] Mordachai_Shedbacon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That's cool! If I saw this in my supermarket I'd def try it.

[–] alottachairs@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I get this is positive, but it saddens me to hear people comment now I can start eating more ethically. There have always been vegan options available. They have been there this whole time, this is merely another option out there, the majority of people will still prefer the "real thing".

The only victim the in the situation is the Animals, their gauntlet of suffering from our hands must come to an end.

[–] ezri@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For someone like me, there honestly aren't many options. I'm allergic to soy, which eliminates a LOT of vegan meat alternatives. I do mostly eat the options I can have rather than eating meat, but a lot of these options are relatively new and have most certainly not "been there this whole time".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›