468
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 133 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How does it make sense? She's got 12 years to serve for what happened while serving 43 years for a crime she didn't commit, that means she served 31 extra years already! And that's not even giving her the benefit of the doubt that she could potentially have spent 0 years in prison had she not been incarcerated in the first place meaning that the 12 years aren't her fault but the fault of the system that put her in prison even though she was innocent!

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 102 points 2 years ago

Seriously. She's banked a little time. She should be able to commit a few minor crimes and use her credit.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

She should be allowed to commit 1 nonviolent felony and 4 misdemeanors by my math. More if any of them are victimless.

[-] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago

Just a little crime. Ya know, as a treat.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago
[-] insufferableninja@lemdro.id 5 points 2 years ago

maybe even a little light treason

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 49 points 2 years ago

Not to mention, those extra years were undoubtedly due to the cutthroat environment of landing in prison and having to learn to survive. It’s a goddamn trope in movies/tv. In fucking sitcoms. Prison forces people to become criminals or else be brutalized.

So she was drugged, forced into confessing flimsily, sent to prison as a mentally unwell person, and had to survive. Those violence charges against her should’ve been thrown out immediately after they realized she was never supposed to be there in the first place.

This fuckin system in this fucking country…

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 71 points 2 years ago

Hemme had a two-year sentence imposed July 16, 1984, and a 10-year sentence imposed October 24, 1996, that were both supposed to run consecutive to the murder sentence, which the court overturned in June. Both sentences were related to violence while in prison.

Are you fucking kidding me? She already served 43 years for a crime she didn't commit. Now the AG's office wants to keep her in prison for charges that occurred as a direct result of her incarceration, when she has already served more time than the sentences combined?!?

I can only assume that they're looking for any possible excuse to keep her in because they're afraid of the looming civil suit when they finally let her out.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

She doesn't have to be out to sue. My guess is prison did the opposite of rehabilitate. And now because of it, she isn't fit to be released. Which is even worse.

[-] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

This is the real answer but fuck them they played the blame game now they should release her and have to deal with the consequences. This happens all the time btw, especially in Missouri. They don't want them out because they know what kind of person they will be now that society has failed them. Good. If they are rapists and killers now maybe you shouldn't have imprisoned innocent god damn people. They should let them out and be forced to deal with the consequences of their actions.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but "they" won't be the ones to feel those consequences

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 13 points 2 years ago

This isn't the first time I've see a story like this. I don't remember the specifics but it was a man who was wrongfully convicted and then was attacked in prison. He wound up accidently killing the guy so now he's stuck in prison even though he never should have been there in the first place. I tried googling the case but couldn't find it among the sea of other wrongful convictions.

[-] GuStJaR@lemmy.world 62 points 2 years ago

Whilst this was happening, someone had the thought that they could do something to stop this woman getting out of prison. That person would either need a specific reason, something to gain, or just be one of the smallest people/biggest cunts to ever grace the planet.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 2 years ago

Wait a minute, if she gets released, people will know our prosecutors made at least one bad mistake two decades ago. I know, to prevent people from knowing this public information, I will prevent the release of this innocent person. That will surely safeguard the reputation of this office

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

if she gets released, people will know our prosecutors made at least one bad mistake two decades ago

And that might just start people thinking that the death penalty is barbaric. Can't allow that to happen...

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 56 points 2 years ago

I agree with all the other reasons this is fucked, but let's all step back and have a shudder about this:

In 2015, after Holman’s death, authorities searched his house to find gold horseshoe-shaped earrings in a closet, which Jeschke’s father said he had given his daughter.

If dude had just thrown those earrings away she'd have had no hope of ever being released.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago

That poor girl. Lost her whole life to some nonsense. So sad. I wish I could do more to stop things like this from happening

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 years ago

Likely killer sounded like a gem

This wording didn’t age too well…

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago

Well, that story played out like a bad movie. -Dirty cop, frame-job, and all.

[-] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

What was that epic poem released by that group? Oh yeah, Fuck the Police.

[-] blackluster117@possumpat.io 11 points 2 years ago

How does this not fall under "Fruit of the poisoned tree"? The original conviction was in error, any charges stemming from the consequences of that conviction should also be in error. I hope she's able to resolve this and get some part of her life back.

[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

For republicans... Cruelty IS the point

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
468 points (99.2% liked)

News

39551 readers
2309 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS