this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
272 points (97.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35589 readers
685 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.

Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...

2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...

3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...

4. No Porn/ExplicitContent

-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...

5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts

-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...

6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

7. Content should match the theme of this community.

-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...

8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.

-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...

Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense

Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
LillianVS@lemmy.world
STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
272
Youtube replaced unicode emojis with fucking images (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by rzadkie@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Some time ago, I noticed that youtube comments are copied without emojis, thought nothing of that - bugs happen - but today I finally decided to find out why and what the hell is even this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 119 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Odds are they did it so everyone would have uniform emojis. Would also enforce the gun to squirt toy change. Also it may be a remedy for the fact that android updates suck ass. A new phone may never be updated and be stuck with old emojis. Google should have learned by now to abstract away the hardware drivers, but that would make too much sense.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 47 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What exactly does it matter to be stuck with old emojis? Why is it important for them to be perfectly uniform?

[–] rimu@piefed.social 71 points 4 months ago (7 children)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 56 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wtf Microsoft?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 43 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The ones in MS Teams are so cursed. I use it for work and I swear everything about that app is peak catering to boomers.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Also made by boomers perhaps?

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

hey microsoft! incorporate boomer emoji!

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 3 months ago

They changed this a very long time ago

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's really interesting, I didn't realise the problem was that bad. I did the quiz at the bottom, tried to answer honestly and only got 5 out of 14 correct.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I got 7 and even then that's only because half way through I began to notice a theme on the really obscure ones with long names.

These are ridiculous, they often bear no resemblance at all to their supposed meaning wtf? Slanted closed eyes with steam coming out the nostrils isn't anger it's.... "Triumph"!?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that was a particularly egregious one! Triumph? Triumph?!? Ok then...

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago

Mind you, emoji were created in Japan, so a lot of the original ones can be weird to us due to cultural differences.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago

Would love to see actual use vs intented use on that one lol.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When they look different people interpret them differently.

Ah, paralinguistic communication is always like this. Once you change the symbol ever so slightly, the meaning being conveyed also changes.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

hieroglif over kanji

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hieroglyphs and kanjis are still linguistic in nature. So no matter how you write a specific unit it'll be interpreted the same, as long as recognisable as that unit. Here's a Japanese example:

sure, they're written in slightly different ways, but they're still the same ⟨愛⟩ /ai/ kanji, so it's still conveying the same meaning (love, affection).

Emojis on the other hand aren't typically used to convey a language, even if conveying meaning and found alongside language. That's what makes them paralinguistic (beyond language), they're a lot more like "mmhmm, ah!, ahn?" grunts or Italian hand gestures than like kanji or hieroglyphs. And in this sort of paralinguistic system, even little changes on the symbol change its meaning.

And... well, that's what we're seeing here, and the likely reason YT replaced unicode emojis with images. For me at least it's convenient, might as well uBlock them.

[–] unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago

This was a great explanation, thanks.

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

And this is exactly why emojis suck and should never have been invented

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I guess that makes more sense now that I see an example. I just can't fathom how any Apple artist thought they made a "grinning face with smiling eyes" when they looked at that image. It's "grimacing face with smiling eyes" very obviously. I thought all representations were like the others in this example - they all look like a "grinning face with smiling eyes". They look different but it doesn't matter.

I still think though that if there weren't obvious mistakes like this, it doesn't matter how the "grinning face with smiling eyes" exactly looks, or any other emoji for that matter.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's clearly another way to wall the apple garden further, to the point where you don't get to communicate in an effective way unless you both have an iPhone.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That isn’t what the grinning face with smiling eyes ever looked like on iOS. I have no clue where that article got that. And it’s not what it looked like on other platforms either. They have their emoji confused and so you can’t even trust the survey at that point. Here is the history of the emoji across platforms. https://emojipedia.org/grinning-face-with-smiling-eyes#designs. And I’d say that google’s emoji versions look bad compared to the iOS versions. Samsung’s are horrendous though.

And just for comparison here is the grimacing face history. https://emojipedia.org/grimacing-face#designs

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That's interesting. I wonder how true that still is today, given the study was done in 2016. The study also pointed out that even on the same platform, people on average interpreted the same emojis differently. I'd be interested in an updated study conducted among younger Gen Z to see if being completely raised in the digital age has created various emoji languages, especially across cultures (which they mention they wanted to do at the end of the article as well).

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

note on emojipedia it's called BEAMING face with smiling eyes

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You do realize you can load fonts with emojis, right? Does this work on mobile devices?

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Would also enforce the gun to squirt

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 66 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's aweseome! Now you can set up uBlock to remove them. Love it.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 2 points 4 months ago

You could block the Unicode text string before as well.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)

it's because on web people would get different designs according to which operating system is used. Marketing prefers uniformity. They could load a webfont, but color font support is not really universal and because people use always the same 10 emojis it's faster to load only those cached pngs compared to a full webfont with 3000 emojis that aren't even used in that specific page

[–] tmpod@lemmy.pt 15 points 4 months ago

The web font would also be cached, and it wouldn't be that big of a resource in the first place. I think being able to copy a comment's content is more important, but whatever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think if they just filled the alt= attribute with the emoji this would copy fine.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

wait they used to do that but they broke it

[–] No_Support_8363@lemm.ee 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Bruuhhhh whyyyy

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 30 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Consistency. They don't want to be at the whim of your font (which for many users will be the OS default). While it's not frequent, sometimes Apple (iOS) or Microsoft (Edge) will have a very different interpretation of a Unicode emoji, which makes the UX of comments containing those emoji inconsistent between YT users.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Then they can grow up and add alt text

[–] qisope@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

If things work like twitch and they have custom emotes when you 'join' a channel as a paying member, it might also just be for consistency in how they handle the common free emotes and channel-specific emotes.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's what webfonts are for

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 4 months ago

I have been in meetings which people who thought the fact that a user could use a different font, even only intentionally, was "unacceptable".

I hope those people aren't directing the ship at YT, but could be.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

It takes a lot more effort, leading to some developer keeping his job. Also, it increases the maintenance cost, again leading to some developer keeping his job.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 months ago

They could have gone the webfont way instead..

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Absolutely ridiculous. For a company that touts web technologies down our throats all day, this is mind-boggling.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That sucks.

I'd guess that what they were probably trying to do is make things work for random user who doesn't have a font with said emojis installed and has no understanding of how to fix things.

Still seems like it'd be better to only fall back to rendering images if the user doesn't have a suitable font installed; I'm pretty sure that that's doable.

Might be possible to revert the change with GreaseMonkey or something like that.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

if the user doesn't have a suitable font installed

Then they can just download the font. No need for images.

I bet this is about making the emoji animated or something

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unless your on a mobile device and that's not an option.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Why wouldn't it be? I don't mean install it, they could just download it on page load like other fonts

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I guess webfonts would work.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Still liked emoticons better. The emojis all look cursed. But i am sure someone will misinterpret those too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago

But it’s FAANG company, they know how to do best /s

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

all emojis should be blobcats and blobfoxes.

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

So we're back to emoticons now?

What's old is new again...

load more comments
view more: next ›