this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
216 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2082 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 64 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They see the writing on the wall. The younger generations understand technology and are much less hesitant about regulating it.

In 15 - 20 years the majority of Congress won't be made up of people who say 'I don't understand it but it's making money so let's leave them be' — it'll be made up full of people who say 'this shit worked better when I was a kid, let's go back to that'.

[–] cuck4mai@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not really. It will still be made up mostly of people who say "thanks for the donation" to lobbyists.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

🎶 because democracy here is just a curtain 🎶

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Who? The couch fucker JD Vance?

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I heard the "JD" stands for "Jackhammer Davenport," according to his book.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

He probably tells people that. But it sounds like over compensation to me

[–] Aphelion@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago

That's Couch-fucker McGuy-Liner to you.

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Those stains on all the couches at Mar A Lardo aren’t just from Donnie’s incontinence.

[–] MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Are people still talking about JD Vance having sex with a couch? We need to put to bed the idea of JD Vance having sex with a couch. It’s not appropriate for people to think of Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance having sex with a couch. JD Vance has gone on record to deny that he has had bare skin contact with a couch within the last 5 years. It’s absurd that JD Vance was banned from a Cleveland area IKEA after making sweet, passionate love to a KIVIK Sofa Chaise.

Once again, there is no evidence of JD Vance having sex with a couch. You need to stop calling JD Vance a couchfucker.

[–] razorwiregoatlick@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Exactly! I’m so tired of hearing that JD Vance fucked a couch. We literally have no evidence that JD Vance fucked a couch. For all we know JD Vance fucked a Lazy Boy, or JD Vance fucked a pound of ground beef heated in the microwave and wrapped in cellophane. Why does everyone assume it was a couch. There really is no way of knowing.

[–] greenshirtdenimjeans@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This mofo is so WOKE he changed his name TWICE.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Tryin’a escape from the rapey couches that keep following him around everywhere

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Their Trojan Horse has failed miserably so far. Gotta hand it to a weirdo like Peter Thiel to put up someone so repulsive and totally uncharismatic.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I think that democracy may be okay. Hear me out. Everywhere I turn I keep hearing that democracy has failed for a variety of reasons that I won't rehash here.

What if the "democracy has failed" assertion is meant to dishearten people who would otherwise fight for it? Like, if democracy has already failed then there is no point to fighting the fascists. But, if the fascists have a road map to destroy democracy that relies on little to no resistance from the masses, then convincing people that democracy has failed is a pretty sharp move from a political strategy point of view.

[–] Zeke@fedia.io 17 points 4 months ago

Democracy only fails if we stop fighting for it.

[–] catch22@startrek.website 9 points 4 months ago

These animals have no morals and will use any trick they can think of. But I think you're right, people will fight on and part of that is stopping people from becoming disheartened.

I don't think true democracy has ever been achieved, where all people have a say in how society operates. So it is, fundamentally, a never ending story.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

This country’s democracy has been optimized to benefit a privileged few, the failure has been going on for longer than I’ve been around. We fight fascists for our lives, don’t let some nebulous country rock nonsense about democracy obscure that. It’s not the government that’s worth saving, it’s the people

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Couches with tissue dispensers built in everywhere, for all the people