this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
332 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

10743 readers
3942 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 94 points 2 months ago

On OGLE-TR-56b it only rains ironically

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

okay. so. like... given that "diamond" is a particularly defined cyrstalline form of carbon. Does neptune rain solid diamond? wouldn't that be more like.... 'hail'?

also. it's always fun to me reading some older scifi where they colonize venus because it looked like... how we look at mars today.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I read old scifi where Venus was full of rainforests. That's not how we see Mars today

[–] LordTrychon@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There was a young adult sci fi series by Asimov called 'Lucky Starr' and I remember Venus was Oceanic in that one. Old old series.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All we could see were clouds implying rain (forests), or even more (and only) water.

[–] LordTrychon@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

Yep. I found it fascinating. I think the version I had probably had a forward from Asimov talking about how we were wrong about guesses about Venus.

I don't remember much else from the story except this, and the big reveal of the whodunnit. (Or more accurately the how).

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah there aren't any slaves to exploit on other planets, so they aren't interested

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Yeah, and we've never transported slaves to a new world on ships before.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not one of these is "men."

I'm starting to think that song was a lie!

:P

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Funny thing is that there'd be enough diamonds that even the market crash of hauling a shitload of them back to earth wouldn't stop you from making absolute bank off selling them.

Probably mostly to scientists and specialist mining companies but hey money's money.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

Diamonds aren't actually rare, and the people who control the market would have you executed.

[–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Jevon's principle would save your ass

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want to feel the nice warmth of molten iron on my shoulders. Give me that amazing summer glow only OGLE-TR-56b can provide

[–] Tiltinyall@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago

Why wait? There are foundry positions open everywhere.

[–] Rustywhims@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what diamonds created in a gas giant atmosphere look like. Neptune has crazy high wind speeds.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can’t see dense clouds so it would probably be the same concept considering it’s basically deposition or condensation.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

positively abrasive.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Why are scientists absolutely terrible at naming planets?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They ran out of Greek gods.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

naw. they just stopped naming the children after the first couple rounds of olympians.

why name them when there's a few hundred a month? breed like rabbits, Olympians. probably out of boredom.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I know that Olympians fuck like rabbits, but they only meet up once every four years. Can't be that massive of a population increase.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You really think Zeus is gonna have that long of a dry spell? Never mind Aphrodite or Dionysus?

I bet Hera is a closet freak, too. (Zeus just doesn't like the whips.)

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

From what I can tell, they've all had a several thousand years dry spell. Haven't seen those guys around in a long time.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Assuming they started off as two of them 2000 years ago and Fibonacci was right about rabbit breeding habits (and Olympians mature in 4 years time and don't menopause before the age of 2000). We'd have 139423224561697880139724382870407283950070256587697307264108962948325571622863290691557658876222521294125 (500th element of the Fibonacci sequence (2000 years / 4 years = 500 Olympian breeding seasons). There'd be plenty of them to name planets after.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Then use words, or some blob of syllables of some kind of description.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's like in No Man's Sky where you start out giving thoughtful names to every planet you come across, but after about twenty systems you're running into similar world types and color schemes that evoke the same names you've already used, so you just stop giving a shit and stick with the names the planets are generated with.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

I guess that's a good point.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are approximately two metric shit tons of planets. I assume scientists have better things to do with their time than to sit around and think of names to give to every single one of those.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I just assumed all the ones we would actually hear about would get named more regularly. But I guess if they're talking about a specific one, this would happen. I never really thought about how many must really be out there, but now it seems obvious.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

They do have rules, they're not completely pulling these names out of their arses

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you define rain on a gas giant?

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The same way you define rain in a cloud, when it condenses and falls. Of course diamonds would be hail, not rain.

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

"condensed carbon". It might work..

[–] Whatevster@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago