this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
219 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1930 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 117 points 3 months ago (3 children)

its hilarious that putin or xi could literally pull that orange turds pants down and fuck him on live TV and conservatives would justify it as totally normal

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 62 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They had nothing to say when Trump saluted a North Korean General.

They lost their minds when Obama had a Marine hold his umbrella.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Obama saluting a little too casually with a cup in his hand.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

something something wrong hand!

completely ignores actual regulations that specifically call for times when saluting with the opposite hand from normal

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

Up until Reagan, no President saluted his guards.

On the other hand, Obama did steal Reagan's walking down that long corridor to the podium schtick.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

As long as they keep calling him "the best" and "good boy".

[–] don@lemm.ee 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Republicans can never be trusted again with the presidency.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not until they can clear the rampant conflicts of interest that repeatedly come up, for sure.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Can’t be bothered to prevent the issue, and constantly nominate a shill… so why would you give them an easy out?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

foreign leaders treated Trump like a "chump" and quickly discovered they could manipulate him by boosting his ego.

Flattery and pomp from leaders like Xi, Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the Russian president Vladimir V. Putin seem to have been all that was required to get in Trump’s good graces

Under no circumstances should this imbecile be allowed to be president, of anything, ever.

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Can we stop with the fucking ads please?

Trump, however, had other ideas.

That one line was sandwiched between a video ad and a box asking for my email address. I’d rather have zero access to news stories without a subscription than to have all the goddamned pop ups and online ads that break up the story. The worst are the fucking pop up videos that auto play and follow you down the screen. WHOTHEFUCKWANTSTHATSHIT?!?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

not using ad blocker eh. thats gotta be painful

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, I’ve got an adblocker. Even the sites that block them still have chunks of empty boxes that break up the text.

And why is it on me to block the ads? Why can’t news organizations just not be shitty? I understand they need revenue, but that doesn’t mean I should have to comb through shit to find the story.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I understand they need revenue, but that doesn’t mean I should have to comb through shit to find the story.

Thing is, how would you suggest they get their revenue without ads?

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I’m not saying there should be no ads, I’m saying the site should feature the article and not the ads.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump said he was ready for a "historic" deal with China as the leaders kicked off their meeting and Xi told him "dialogue" was better than confrontation AFP / Brendan Smialowski

Former Trump national security adviser H.R. McMaster has written a new bookfilled with disparaging stories about his former boss, and the New York Times reports that it even features of a story of the former president being blatantly manipulated by Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The incident in question came during a visit to China in November of 2017 in which McMaster tried to warn Trump against letting Xi make him stray from his prepared talking points.

Trump, however, had other ideas.

"In the Great Hall of the People, the president strayed from his talking points," according to the Times's report. "He agreed with Xi that military exercises in South Korea were 'provocative' and a 'waste of money' and suggested that China might have a legitimate claim to Japan’s Senkaku Islands. McMaster, his stomach sinking, passed a note to Gen. John Kelly, the chief of staff: Xi 'ate our lunch,' it read."

**ALSO READ: **Trump revives widely mocked digital trading cards as Harris gains in polls

McMaster also says that foreign leaders treated Trump like a "chump" and quickly discovered they could manipulate him by boosting his ego.

"Flattery and pomp from leaders like Xi, Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the Russian president Vladimir V. Putin seem to have been all that was required to get in Trump’s good graces," writes the Times. 

"In 2018, McMaster found Trump in the Oval Office scrawling a cheerful note to Putin across a New York Post article reporting that the Russian president had denigrated the American political system but called Trump a good listener. Like a child with his Christmas wish list, the leader of the free world asked McMaster to send it to the Kremlin."

Looking forward, writes the Times, McMaster questions whether the 78-year-old Trump is still able to "perform well the sometimes grueling job of president" and he notes that Trump seven years ago became "tired" by a 13-day trip to Asia.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

McMaster also says that foreign leaders treated Trump like a "chump" and quickly discovered they could manipulate him by boosting his ego.

The motherfucker still speaks about his "great relationship" with these leaders, completely oblivious to the fact that it was nothing more than simple flattery intended to manipulate him. I know we all know he's a moron, but sometimes you forget just how fucking simple-minded he is.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Simple minded but also so desperately needy for approval. His sack of shit dad really did a number on him.

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

How are you using the internet without uBlock Origin? o_O

(I also recommend Google Sign-in Popup Blocker on Firefox. And as others have mentioned, Reader mode is nice.)

[–] readbeanicecream@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

Have you met Reader View?

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 10 points 3 months ago

Firefox+uBlock Origin+built in simplified reader mode will net you no ads on that site. You're really doing yourself a disservice by not using those tools.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Rawstory has an ad-blocker blocker. So your choices are use an archive site, or find the reader view in your browser.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

If they do it doesn't work on ublock origin and firefox because I don't see ads on that site.

[–] absGeekNZ 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Clearly you need a blocker blocker blocker!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What if they start blocking the blocker blocker blocker?

[–] absGeekNZ 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess you need to find some form of psychic tech dolphin

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] absGeekNZ 1 points 3 months ago

I'm sure someone here will get the reference

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah. I was hoping it was literal... Like Xi just took Trump's lunch from him and ate it.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

That wouldn't make sense unless Trump's lunch was a jar with "hunny" written on it.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't his literal lunch but then again maybe that too since I doubt Trump would eat Chinese food in China.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

This is a brilliant joke that works on multiple levels

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

[Trump] suggested that China might have a legitimate claim to Japan’s Senkaku Islands.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The weird old orange felon thinks he is a genius, and so does his moron base.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/trump-national-security-team-watched-in-horror-as-china-s-xi-jinping-ate-his-lunch-book/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support