405
  • Former President Trump defended his actions regarding the 2020 election, claiming he had the right to interfere and criticizing the charges against him as politically motivated.
  • Trump argued that the legal actions against him set a bad precedent and accused prosecutors of bias, specifically mentioning federal charges and a Georgia case involving alleged election interference.
  • The Harris-Walz campaign condemned Trump's remarks, stating that he is pushing false narratives and emphasizing Vice President Harris's commitment to upholding the rule of law.
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 166 points 2 years ago

It still bewilders me why we are even having this conversation. The guy tried to overthrow our government. The government of the people, in accordance of our constitution. If that’s not the definition of treason I don’t know what is.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 years ago

trump himself provides the argument for why going after political candidates for "treason" is dangerous. Because if he steals it, you can bet that a LOT of Democrats are literally going to be lined up against a wall and shot (or abused horribly if they are one of the women they are obsessed with...). All because they commit "treason" along the same lines that mtg and the like insisted on impeaching Biden as retribution.

That said, we had four fucking years to investigate this and didn't even start to do anything of worth until year three. And then gave up when one shitty judge stalled and a bunch of shitty politicians declared trump immune from all crimes.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

This is why it's important to lock him the fuck up and make sure it sticks.

He's going to have people lined up and shot regardless if he has to do another insurrection or not. best make sure he can't do that.

[-] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@fedia.io 3 points 2 years ago

His supporters will do it for him regardless, mark my words. We're going to see instances of people being shot for being Democrats after the election regardless of who wins.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Well sure, but his fans are the people whose ancestors seceded from the US because they wanted slaves.

[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 80 points 2 years ago

This is an example of a thing I've said repeatedly about Trump - I'm willing to bet that he's 100% sincere about this. He's not dissembling or diverting - he actually, sincerely believes that he had every right to interfere in whatever ways he wanted.

Why?

Because he's a near-total sociopath. I don't think that concepts of truth and falsehood or right and wrong are even coherent to him. I think his entire measure of everything is wholly personal - if he wants it, then it's right and if he doesn't, then it's wrong, and if he believes it, then it's true, and if he doesn't, then it's false. And it really is that simple. It's not that he lies, but that he lives in a fantasy world in which whatever he believes is true and whatever he wants is right.

[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 29 points 2 years ago

He’s player one. All of the rest of us are just NPCs.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's exactly why all these libertarian tech bros believe we live in a simulation. It makes them the hero of the universe and the rest of us are NPCs they can do whatever they want to.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

sincerely believes that he had every right to interfere in whatever ways he wanted.

Exactly. (Long, but jump to the 30 minute point if you are in a hurry)

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Trump OBVIOUSLY had EVERY RIGHT to interfere! If he didn't he would have been LOCKED UP ALREADY! Paging the United States Justice SYSTEM!

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 79 points 2 years ago

Trump argued that the legal actions against him set a bad precedent

Well, we finally agree on something.

The fact that he's a free man and the republican nominee 4 years after attempting to steal an election and then subsequently attempted a coup is a really fucking bad precedent and shows that the legal system is impotent to stop large scale corruption.

[-] emmy67@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah. The demo needed to take him to task years ago. The fact they waited until the election is a political move and decision. And a poorly thought out one

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sounds like a confession.

We finally got him, right guys? Guys?

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Sounds like he's setting up a defense as it being an official presidential act and thus him being immune from prosecution based on the blanket immunity that SCOTUS recently gave to presidents. So he'll admit to it, be immune, and let everyone else get prosecuted for knowingly following him.

[-] hroderic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Not presidents, just him. They can, and will, rule any actions from a Democratic president to not be official acts.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 48 points 2 years ago

So you’re cool if Biden/Kamala pull the same shit this election, right?

…right???

[-] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago

Fascism 101: it's only cool if I do it, because I'm supposed to be in charge and you're not

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

That's not how narcissism works silly goose 🪿

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

People are saying he's totally telling Biden to do it. Soo many people. You never this many people talk about it. The best people. Top people.

[-] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago

So a confession then?

[-] khan_shot_1st@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Well. He's wrong.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The fool is deluded beyond redemption

[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well, he is a fool…. So…

[-] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@fedia.io 2 points 2 years ago

It's called sociopathy mixed with dementia.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
405 points (98.8% liked)

News

39144 readers
2655 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS