643
Slapping Chicken (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 113 points 2 years ago
[-] grubberfly@mander.xyz 21 points 2 years ago

incredible engineering feat !

this will definitely fulfill someone's kink.

[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I was going to link it if no one else had. Glad I wasn't the only one that recalled that lol

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Damn that was impressive! Also, I'll have to let my little brother know that if he keeps beating his meat so much he might accidentally cook it.

[-] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 92 points 2 years ago

Let's assume the chicken has to reach a temperature of 205C (400F) for us to consider it cooked.

Remind me never to let this guy cook for me.

[-] GreatRam@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Also why is it starting off frozen

[-] SpeakerToLampposts@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Julia Child did some 400° cooking, for a science-oriented TV series called "The Ring of Truth": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ3mjb9BSaU&t=850s
Later in the episode, she got to cook a diamond to amorphous carbon. "I'll remember that recipe -- one carat diamond, two and a half hours, three thousand degrees": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ3mjb9BSaU&t=1458s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bebabalula@feddit.dk 70 points 2 years ago

What I learned from this is never let a physics major cook you dinner, unless you want charcoal for chicken (200C !?!)

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah 60c is done for chicken. That's where meat goes from pink to white. It takes 18 min to kill dangerous food bacteria at that temp.

[-] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 10 points 2 years ago

And they didn't defrost it first 🫠

[-] Fermion@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

0 C wouldn't quite be frozen solid for chicken since it's not pure water. According to a quick search, chicken (unbrined) freezes at -3 C. So technically it is defrosted, but it should start out closer to 10 C for good results.

[-] HoustonHenry@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I was gonna say to start laying off when it gets to 165F, I don't think residual heat will help in this case 😁

[-] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Luckily, it's a linear relationship and they gave us the temp change per slap. So, if we assume the chicken has thawed in the fridge (40°F) and we want to reach 165°F for food safety, we only need

(165 - 40)°F * (5°C / 9°F) / (0.0089 °C / slap)
= 7803 slaps

Although, to be honest I think this would only work for a spherical chicken in a vacuum, as otherwise you'd be losing too much heat between slaps. And even in a vacuum, you'd lose some heat via radiation... So really, you should stick a temperature probe in there and just keep slapping until it reaches 165°F. Don't even bother counting.

Sorry for the silly units, I only know food safety temperatures off the top of my head in °F.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago

But it only needs to reach 165°F, about 74°C.
Basically every food package says so.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 2 years ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

This is correct; always cook to temp.

[-] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 50 points 2 years ago

Don’t forget, the chicken is frozen, so you also have to take into account the latent heat of fusion to melt the chicken before you can raise the temperature

This calculation also assumes that this is an inelastic collision where all the energy is absorbed into the chicken and not into your hand or into the air as sound or other kinetic energy.

Further the chicken is frozen solid, and, presumably, your hand is not. Of the two objects in this collision that could deform inelasticity and absorb the larger fraction of the energy, my money would be on the 0.4 kg slab of raw meat rather than the 1kg frozen billiard ball.

[-] notabot@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

One must also consider the thermal conduction of the chicken. Slapping it, either once or multiple times, on a single area will impart energy to that area, raising the temperature there, but it will take time for that to disperse throughout the fowl. Thus will inevitably lead to the slapped area/areas being overcooked and the rest being dangerously undercooked. Losses to the environment must additionally be taken into account unless sufficient insulation is employed to mitigate this.

[-] Mambele@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

So would you say that a rotisserie slapping technique would optimal in this scenario?

[-] notabot@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Yes, I think the chicken would need to be rotating, you should use both hands to spread the warmed area, and be prepared to administer more slaps than were calculated.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

205°C? You're slapping your chicken too long, son. Your mother and I are worried.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

To be clear, the slapping would have to be done in one single second to account for heat loss to environment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago

There was a viral YouTube video of doing exactly this a few years back.

https://youtu.be/LHFhnnTWMgI

[-] mEEGal@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago
[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I'm hungrier because I put so many calories into slapping.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago

How many though? Could please someone think of the math? 😭

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

One thing to note, actually cooking something requires an application of heat over time. Instantaneous heat transfer will not cook, it will usually just burn.

Some people say you can use a nuke to cook a pizza if you put it in the right spot, but the same problem would apply.

Related, some guy did actually slap a chicken into being cooked. It was predictably disgusting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFhnnTWMgI

[-] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

It is about 1:06 when I first heard him call it a meat beater.

He needed a faster meat better. Bruva, we are right here!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

That's assuming an isentropic chicken though. You need even more slaps to make up for the heat loss to the environment.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Didn't someone build a machine to do this

Wait a minute 400°F? What dafuck?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 2 years ago

He confused internal temp with oven temp lol (I still probably wouldn't cook a chicken at 400° though.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Why isn't it a concern what slapping at this speed does to your hand/arm?

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

Because we are men, and men feel no pain when we slap things.

This is why we slap each other on the back after losses in sports, and why pimpin ain't easy.

[-] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

When Martha from accounting last asked me what my plans were for that night, I told her I was going to slap my chicken.

She won't look me in the eye any more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Fun fact, 165F is often parroted for cooking chicken, but I urge everyone to go lower. 155-160F results in much juicier chicken. 165F corresponds to instantaneously killing all bacteria. 155F is about 60s, and 160F is 15s.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

This isn't going to be accurate, it's ignoring a key aspect of the heat that will be generated, friction. When designing materials for prosthetics we have to be aware of how much friction occurs between the material and skin. If the amount of friction is too great, the material can create enough heat to damage tissue.

The formula for the skin friction coefficient is cf=τw12ρeue2, where ρe and ue are the density and longitudinal velocity at the boundary layer's edge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

The chicken ran away when I tried to slap it.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago

Geez, you need to freeze it first. Didn't you read the abstract?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
643 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

21121 readers
373 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS