this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
618 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
4163 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 163 points 2 months ago (53 children)

How can we go back? We're already on the way back. It's called the Fediverse.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 50 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I help pay for my instance to operate, and it's a cost I'm happy to help shoulder.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 16 points 2 months ago

Us instance admins appreciate it I promise

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Banichan@dormi.zone 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ehhhh, the OG internet connected better because all nodes were well connected. The Fediverse is a series of single servers that can't even sync all data across themselves. It's cute, but it's post-it notes on strings atm

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] michael@lemmy.chrisco.me 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yep we have different lemmy/mastodon/etc.... instances talking with one another. Anyone can set up something like activityhub. Its a fun place in my opinion!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 118 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

2 ways to go back:

  1. Corporations become less greedy.

  2. Consumers and businesses stop tolerating abuse and consider other options that will temporarily inconvenience them.

Neither one seems likely. If it were we simply wouldn't be here in the first place.

[–] Electricblush@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

A few of us still remembers option 3) Regulation And also 4) Properly working anti-trust laws.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

Those are both the same, and would fall under #2.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I've said before and I'll say again. I would use the option on amazon for shipping that says "let your employees pee". I get my package 2-3 days later. Oh well. I don't give a shit. I'd rather normalize companies treating people like people. And if I get my limited edition pez dispenser 3 days later, so be it.

Not like it's an oxygen tank.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It isn’t just corporations that have ruined everything, it’s spammers and scammers and cybercriminals too. Searching any topic these days is a crapshoot, with a high likelihood of falling into a spammer’s tarpit.

To me it feels like the internet is evolving into a virtual Dark Forest. We float around in these little bubbles of sanity, hiding amid a yawning expanse of seething chaos.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Libraries should evolve to play a larger role in the internet, theyve been trying to reinvent themselves and i think this best aligns with their spiritual purpose. Some ideas:

Caretakers of digital archives.

Caretakers of relevant open source projects.

Could I get a free domain with my library card?

Could I get free api access to mapping or other localized data?

Should libraries host local fediverse instances for civic users? (think police, firefighter alert, other community related feeds)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How did we get here? Adtech, tracking, monetization.

Can we go back? By removing the ubiquitous affiliate marketing financial incentives, so no.

[–] sverit@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah man. Last time YouTube was good was when people were making videos just for fun, not for clout.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't be silly, the proletariat just needs to unite, seize the nuclear stockpiles of at least two nations capable of destroying all life on earth in defense of the oligarchy's hoards, and then decentralize ownership of the global communication infrastructure.

Easy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 66 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Go back to site directories.

Curate your news feed.

Stop using a single corporate search engine.

Participate in online social communities, not in social media.

[–] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Love that last line. Will remember.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yegambit@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, selfhost most essential services like mail, messengers, web search, piped frontend, vpn, and other things like gitea/forgejo and jellyfin, web 3.0 will be federated network

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 31 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Isn't web 3.0 the whole crypto ntf bullshit. Maybe we skip that one and go straight to 4.0

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think in general it's supposed to be about decentralisation, but god knows scammers will hop straight onto anything with "point-oh" in the name

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Some websites dont allow selfhosted mails, they want one of the big names.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Creating a closed network on the Internet where any commercialization and domination are prohibited might help?

Something like Tor/freenet/I2P, but less shady (I know it’s not meant to be like this), open and accessible to anyone.

Edit: I remembered about gemini protocol, where you get

lightweight online space where documents are just documents, in the interests of every reader's privacy, attention and bandwidth

Perfect for the new better internet, huh?

For Android/iOS users, there’s a client called Lagrange on F-droid and Testflight

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

Back in the days of the wild frontier things were chaotic, anarchic, violent, and unconstrained.

Then came the churches, then came the schools
Then came the lawyers, then came the rules
Then came the trains and the trucks with their loads
And the dirty old track was the Telegraph Road

And now we're all fenced in, regulated, allowed to wander only in approved lanes... oh, wait, sorry, we're talking about the internet, not real life!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago (2 children)

When you remove the barriers to entry, the average quality users decreases, leading to an increase of corporate interest in an attempt to market to them all. These corporations do not care about the environment, and they run what the masses haven't yet trashed in order to commodify it for maximum profit.

First the planet, then the Internet, next who knows? Maybe the entire human genome. Soon everyone will have to pay to remove dream ads and there will be a paywall inhibiting serotonin production without a subscription.

[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 31 points 2 months ago

Indeed, Reddit was a great example of this. All of the stupid things they tried to pull off in the past few years (selling user data, turning off the API, insulting their users, VPN blocking, to name a few) would have not worked when they were a growing website. Now that they have so many low quality users, they can do that successfully because they know that said users are too dumb to realize how they're being abused. Even larger websites like Twitter and Facebook operate this way.

The takeaway here is: don't focus on having many users, focus on having good users. All relationships are a two-way street, and if you're on the side of the street with too many people, you don't have any personal leverage on your own. It's in your best interests to get out of that relationship.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Not sure this has been said yet, but Neocities is a pretty great throwback to GeoCities and the early 2000's web.

All a bunch of small, handcrafted websites and personal blogs by individuals and small groups.

Exploring feels like I remember back in the early 2000's as a teen. Crazy and weird sites, hidden links and easter eggs, ARGs, random annon comments you can post to a wall, .gifs all over, pixel art, hacker manifestos, links to other similar sites, etc.

The Fediverse is pretty great too.

I wish there were more site directories curated by communities, that would reduce my reliance on search engines for sure. RSS is great, I've been using that to help build my personal content feed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Fediverse is as close as I've gotten to Internet the way it used to be, and I donate to the instances I use in order to keep it that way. I wish everyone would.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Someone showed me this and it's the closest I've seen to the way the internet used to be lol

Shows a different site every click

https://wiby.me/surprise/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

Capitalism. No.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I totally agree. Corporate interests and rampant consumerism have ruined the majority of the internet.

Glad we still have refuges like lemmy though to take solace in. Proportionally we're a smaller part, but absolutely I'd say we're about the same or larger than in the 2000s.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

we’re a smaller part

Quality trumps quantity anytime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 28 points 2 months ago

New rule: programmatic advertising is illegal

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

This. Lemmy is the way to go. Decentralized Communities connected via API.

I don't see many other possibilities. The system needs a "free for ever" mechanic or big money shits into everything.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think monetization ruined it. There's a lot more trash to sift through.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 21 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The genie is already out of the bottle BUT, one solution would be to raise the barrier to entry again.

Return the internet to the pre-"smart" phone era, in which a minimum bar of effort and knowledge needed to be present in order to connect and participate on the web.

In 2008~2010, the flood gates opened for all the normies to stampede in and everything has been downhill since then.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 18 points 2 months ago

I agree to an extent, but the problem is not so much the normies themselves as it is the massive commercial market they represent. You might point to mainstream social media as evidence of a problem with the people themselves, but you would be overlooking the fact that the surveillance and attention economies have meant these social media platforms are deliberately designed to position people against one another to drive engagement so these companies can charge more to advertisers. Discourse on the internet isn't getting worse because there are more bad people online, it's getting worse because companies have a financial incentive to turn us into bad people when we are online.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The normies are not the problem, they are the victims. The abusers are the giant corporation manipulating the masses and monetizing a publicly funded infrastructure for their own gains.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fishos@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

We're in Eternal September now. Have been for a few decades.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Deello@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How did we get here

Money!

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago

can we go back?

No!

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (9 children)

To a large degree, the same internet that used to be, still is.

Keep in mind that in the era they are nostalgic for, the internet involved roughly 4% of the world's population. As big in the public conciousness was, it was a relatively small thing.

For example, most people see Lemmy as pretty small and much slower content coming at you than reddit. However Lemmy is still way bigger than what a mid 90s experience with the internet would be. I can still connect to play BBS Door games and there's barely anyone there, but there were barely any people there back then either. The "old" internet is still there, it's just small compared to the vast majority of the internet that came about later.

Some things are gone, but replaced. For example Geocities now has neocities, which is niche by today's standards, but wouldn't be shocked if neocities technically is bigger than geocities ever was in absolute terms.

Some things are gone and won't come back. The late 2000s saw a really nice and stable all-you-can-watch streaming experience from Netflix, and their success brought about maddening licensing deals where material randomly appears, moves, and disappears and where a lot of material demands more to "rent" than buying an actual Blu Ray disc of it would cost (have gone back to buying discs as of late because it's cheaper than streaming).

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (11 children)

Free hosting, for everyone, without ads.

Ut-oh.

(But seriously, while it wasn't free, having an account with an ISP used to come with 10 MB of personal webspace without ads or anything. That's something you never really see these days.)

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Since when internet usage became wide spread enough that it could be used to make billions and/or promote political propaganda (which really ties back to again making money in most cases).

Anything that becomes used by a reasonable fraction of the whole world will be in the target of governments, venture capitalists (i.e individuals seeking for en masse manipulation). There is no way to prevent this as long as both exist.

Creating a lot of small communities rather than one large community is a good incentive but I think it fails to completely address this issue as long as they are interconnected in some way.

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Quality through obfuscation... make it harder to use. If the dimwits can't figure out how to use it...

Archive the entire thing and start over.

load more comments
view more: next ›