this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
1146 points (96.3% liked)

Memes

45361 readers
2093 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] u_die_for_elmer@lemm.ee 172 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, CEO of Exxon Grandma.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (7 children)

you seem oddly human for a bot

[–] u_die_for_elmer@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Ops not a bot

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Botly bot bottin

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 102 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Letting oil barons, war mongers, and other billionaire scum off some really big hooks with that "entirely" part..

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago

She looks like she could be an oil baronness

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

I'd wager Grandma is symbolic of the generation to which most of those barons, mongers, and billionaires belong.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You extracted billions of years of stored energy from the ground and set it on fire over 50 years. Did you really think there weren’t any consequences?

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

They didn't care. They got to live through the benefits and not have to worry about the consequences. As far as the climate is concerned, they were the party generation, and we're the hangover generation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] u_die_for_elmer@lemm.ee 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Take that, entire-capitalist-system-built-on-burning fossil-fuels-grandma.

[–] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The San Francisco Bay Area is having the hottest and longest heat wave of the year right now. I hate it. October shouldn't be so hot. 90% of residences in SF don't even have AC because it was almost never necessary 20 years ago.

[–] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

99 in Berkeley right now. My house was built in like 1928 and since we rent obviously there's been no energy efficient updating of insulation or anything like that since maybe the 60s. It's like 94 inside right now. Sitting in front of multiple fans just blowing hot air at me this is the life y'all.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Pretty much the same temps for me in the south bay.

It's not much, but wearing a soaked t-shirt/tank and having a fan or two circulating the air with the dryer stuff outside has helped me a bit.

I didn't check today but it was 105 yesterday a few miles inland. I saw the HVAC dude at the food truck and he was the happiest I've ever seen him.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The good news is that PG&Es “lower” winter rates kicked in on Oct. 1 so at least we get to fuck them back a little bit.

[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Also increases baseline allowance, which will be super useful since my "portable" AC has been eating so much power this month.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It was supposed to end last week too...

[–] Manzas@lemdro.id 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] unique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

Barely, going to be 17°C again this week.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's always interesting that people are quick to talk about extreme weather changes but rarely want to address the causes. I ended up watching a video that touches on the topic. I hate Mondays.

Everyone hates Mondays and everyone loves talking about how Mondays suck! You'll never have conversations about "fixing" Mondays though. That's because Mondays are just a fact of life. There will always be a day you have to go to work. Moving the start day or shortening the work week doesn't change the fact that everyone will still dislike the day their time off ends and their work hours start. You can't "fix" Mondays.

There are also people who think other social problems are just like Mondays. Unfixable. Of course they agree it's bad! But there's just nothing that can be done.

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Continuing with the analogy, even the honest attempts to fix Mondays are characterized as impractical, idle fantasies.

How about we don't schedule critical meetings to start first thing Monday morning? Even if that's the "only" time everyone can meet? And if it's really the only time everyone has available, doesn't that warrant questioning a bit?

Or what if we just start later on Mondays? And maybe we consider not offsetting it but working later on other days? 39-hour week? 36-hour week?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

You just hit the nail on the head for things that bother me. People just throwing out ideas that "only partially" work. This isn't just Monday's, or climate change, but literally every fucking bit of politics. It drives me up the wall.

"Yeah but it only makes things 50% better, so I don't support it"

So we'll sit with 100% bad rather than 50% better because Jim in Arizona thinks we need to only have perfect solutions, and that anything that only makes things better aren't worth investigating. Better transit, electric cars, heat pumps, hydrogen trains, gun control, sex education, free lunches? All horrible things to Jim because "they don't solve the problem". No, they just make it much better. Maybe we could use them while we search for the perfect solution, you know slow incremental change? No, okay then fuck you too, Jim

And while I clearly call out one side, us liberals are very guilty of this too. In fact, there's already an example of that elsewhere in these comments.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Every one of Innuendo Studio's videos are absolutely excellent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

we're basically hoping the massive push to batteries/Solar by both China and the U.S is successful in the next decade as they are the countries with the highest KW/h usage to lay a gameplan to get neighboring countries to do the same if it proves to be fruitful.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This will not save us, we're still set to burn way too much fossil fuel even with fast EV/solar/electrification.

We. Need. To. Consume. Less.

But... but... what about infinite growth??

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

have you seen the sharp decline of fossil fuel based energy in some locations? The whole point in the necessary move for a battery storage in the long term is to minimize the requirement to boot up gas facilities after work hours, where peak power usage happens and solar is minimum.

The problem with global usage is poorer nations cannot afford to switch off dirty energy, and richer nations have a harsh post work hour usage. Lowering usage doesn't fix the problem that there are dozens of countries that will still continue to burn dirty till some country invests in a cleaner option.

put in perspective, even though China and the US has the most power consumption, unlike GDP, it doesn't take that many more countries after them to equate how much power they consume. So unless theres a global shutoff of power (which on its own, will have a plethora of long lasting problems if everything just shuts down), the best solution is to swap the type of energy that generates the most heat/green house gasses out.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a few countries with huge hydroelectric resources, which are not applicable to most of the world. Other countries have merely seen a peak and slight decline, and based on trends it will take decades for that decline to reach the levels we need tomorrow. Demand for compute from the AI tech bubble has basically destroyed all the progress we've made since the pandemic.

The problem is too much consumption. Rich nations gobble up as much as they can and poorer nations are used as their mining pits and factories to feed the endless appetite for more, and as long as this continues the world is going to continue warming.

[–] dragonfucker 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Drag thinks we should just implement an ETS, ban cars and meat, cap rents low on poorly insulated houses, and put the defence budget into renewable energy and batteries. Easy peasy.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

What if she voted for Jimmy Carter?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

12°C at 4am.
I already pulled out the winter bed sheets because it was sub 10 a few days ago several times...

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

It's 87 right now over here. It's 10pm.

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 4 points 3 days ago

Well... It's cold here in northen Italy

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago

287 degrees here, much warmer than expected.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

But seriously, I was introduced to Canada in late October of 93. And arrived to 18"+ of snow.

load more comments
view more: next ›