this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
311 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19033 readers
2636 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 133 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Really glad the president of the USA finally decided to pull the lower inflation lever in the oval office.

[–] Moops@fedia.io 61 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I look forward to all the Biden "I did this!" stickers lauding his administration for lowering inflation.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can just reuse all the ones MAGAts stuck on gas pumps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lower inflation doesn't mean lower prices - which we need, and/or higher wages - it means prices are going up a little more slowly. Pointing at a $9 jar of mayonnaise with an "I did this" isn't going to win many people over.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It shouldn't mean lower prices; deflation is bad, we just want a low rate of inflation. What we do want is for wages to outpace that, and for the past couple of years, they have for people at the lower end of the scale (which is also good)

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My apologies

Really glad the ~~president~~ knob of the USA finally decided to pull the lower inflation lever in the oval office.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

lol gottem

hey wait...

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It's right next to the gas price slider. Duh.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

It's right next to the Gas Price Dial on the Resolute desk.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I saw this when I opened Edge for work this morning. Two worlds in one picture.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Someone is lying and I have a sneaking suspicion of who it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Now pay me more and we're good.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] xlash123@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While this is good news, remember that this means that prices are still increasing due to inflation, just at a slower rate now. It does NOT mean that inflation has been reversed.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not sure why there are down votes here. It's an important fact to remember that inflation "falling" doesn't mean the cost of living is going down.

Whether reversing inflation is good or not isn't their point. The point is, living is still more expensive than last year and your wage hasn't been keeping up since the 70s.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago

Probably because most people are too lazy to explain that deflation is a bad thing and incredibly hard to get unstuck. The "ideal" scenario is one where inflation stays low and wages outpace it. A small amount of inflation is a way to stop billionaires from sitting on piles of cash. At least with inflation they're incentivized to spend it on investments, some of which are good for the economy.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 41 points 3 days ago (6 children)

That's still 2.4% on top of the cumulated inflation of the past 5 years...

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 47 points 3 days ago

You misspelled price gouging.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Sure. But inflation is down, we didn't go into a recession, and wage growth has been outpacing inflation for over a year now.

This is good, we're going in the right direction. Deflation would be way worse.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

We should raise the minimum wage until it is commensurate with the price gouging. All at once, since none of the corporations eased us into higher prices.

But we have zero parties in this country that are willing to raise the minimum wage at the national level.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Yeah but unfortunately that's never going to change. Inflation is the rate of increase and they always want a rate of increase, just at 2%.

It's never going to go negative because growth for the growth gods!! :(

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Line must go up.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The economy would tank really hard if wet somehow deflated it to go back in time. It doesn't work like that.

Plus the last 5 years was almost entirely from covid anyway

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

I'm not saying it should. I'm just saying the rest of us still can't keep up even with 2% because of the cumulative two digits inflation we've had over the past few years on top of it.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's just how inflation works though. Wages tend to rise slower than prices do. In economic terms, wages are "sticky." They rise and fall slower than prices do in response to market conditions. Long periods of slow gradual inflation are fine, as people simply demand that their wages rise at a steady 2-3% to keep up with inflation, and employers expect it. But if there is a sudden spike in prices, it's a lot harder for employees to suddenly negotiate wage increases. Instead, the slower process of labor market competition, employees leaving underpaying jobs for better paying jobs, has to take over. It's going to take a few years for wages to catch up with the spike in prices, but it does happen with time, primarily from people switching jobs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You want a deflationary environment? Are you sure?

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

That's what you got from my one line comment?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Food prices are still up twenty to forty percent.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right! and now, amazing news! Our expenses are only growing at a rate of only 2.4%!! Hooray?!?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (15 children)

2% is actually pretty good and about what you want. Maintaining flat spending power sounds great on paper, but also puts an economy at increased risk of recession and citizens at increased risk of ballooning debt.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 7 points 2 days ago

Oh that's wonderful, because as we all know inflation is the only reason for the increasing prices...right? There couldn't be any other contributing factors?

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's great the prices aren't going up more. Now go get all of these companies that are price gouging. It's good to protect people from it during natural disasters but unfortunate the government didn't consider COVID a natural disaster.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Oh they are still going up, just not as much.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago

Waiting to see the creative ideas Republicans come up with to try to tank it before November

load more comments
view more: next ›