this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
326 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2504 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 158 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I can't believe they made that.

Although I'm sick of hearing about that turd, the fact that his campaign people are calling for it to go away kind of makes me want to see it.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 65 points 1 month ago

Yeah i really have no intention at all of watching this. But the lead actors are great, and the pushback from Trump make it tempting.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Reportedly, one of the financial backers kept it from being distributed because he thought it was going to portray Trump in a flattering light (edit: and was angry that it didn't). The only reason it's now being released is because his share was bought out.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not what I've heard. The movie's creator recently gave an interview on the The New Yorker Radio Hour, where he cited as one of the difficulties the film faced with financial backers and distributors that it included a scene of Trump raping Ivana Trump (a claim she later recanted under pressure from Trump's lawyers).

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's what I'm talking about, as well as scenes showing Trump using amphetamines.

Dan Snyder, who donated over $1 million to Trump's campaign and also backed this film, was reportedly angry about the negative portrayals of Trump. He kept fighting the release of the movie until his company's stake in the film was bought out, which is why it's being shown now.

Source.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Ah, gotcha. The podcast doesn't make it sound so drastic, but it goes in a similar direction.

[–] style99@lemm.ee 75 points 1 month ago

This does seem pretty on-point:

Vanity Fair journalist Gabriel Sherman, who wrote the screenplay, draws a direct line between Cohn’s bare-knuckle tactics and Trump’s modern-day political persona. Cohn (Jeremy Strong) instructs Trump (Sebastian Stan) to relentlessly attack, “deny everything” and “never admit defeat.”

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know that this movie will portray drumpf in a (rightfully) negative light, but even that isn't enough. I can barely stand this individual now, why on earth would I want to see him being portrayed by a handsome actor for an hour and a half or however long this movie is? I am sick of hearing him talk, I'm sick of people talking about him, I'm sick of hearing about him, I just want him to get locked away in a prison cell to rot away the rest of his intolerable existence.

I would need a movie to completely abandon portraying him in any light that could be construed as sympathetic or favorable. I would love to see a movie show drumpf in the same light that Inglorious Bastards portrayed hitler. Anything short of that is just giving this pathetic racist rapist more attention than he's worth.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s been described as a monster movie, so I assume Trump grabbing a woman by the pussy and taking her to the top of the Empire State Building before being blasted to bits by helicopters is the reason to see it.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Fuck me, I'd watch that.

Though Kong had a code of ethics and morals superior to trump.

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 34 points 1 month ago

Sebastian Stan as Trump?

He's way too handsome for that role.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

As weird as it sounds, the wig on Sebastian Stan looks realistically fake.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

His campaign can go fuck itself

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I really don't know how well this will perform in theaters.

Are they trying to trick MAGAs into watching it? Get enough people who hate him to watch it?

Seems like a made for TV movie with better actors.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I knew it was Sebastian Stan, but then I watched this (without sound) and couldn't tell if it looked more like Jimmy Fallon or Bill Hader.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

To me he looks like classic actor David Selby.

https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0782978/

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

please leak soon!

[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

The fact that the ghost of Roy fucking Cohn still hangs over America is nauseating.

[–] erlend_sh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Haven’t seen the movie yet (guess I’ll have to now), but I imagine it’s a good pairing with this: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7193362/

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for NBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/trump-apprentice-biopic-movie-2024-election-rcna174503
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support