this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
385 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

10587 readers
2496 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This feels like a case where botanical science should just have picked a different name. If you invalidate everything people think of as a berry and then tell them a dozen things that are clearly not berries are, in fact, berries, you're just making the word berry meaningless.

Berry means a tiny, usually sweet, fruit-like growth from a plant. The kind that is usually picked in bunches. The kind that you use to make smoothies. That's a berry.

Botany did us all a disservice by choosing the word "berry" to mean "a specific thing which invalidates everything you think is a berry." Just call that plant structure something in Latin, ffs.

[–] Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 hours ago

Scary-berry

[–] halykthered@lemmy.ml 91 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I appreciate the skittles reference

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is it a skittles reference or is it a reference to purple not being an actual color and thus not a part of the rainbow?

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

the heck do you mean purple is not an actual colour??

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Purple, the color directly between red and blue, is a creation of your mind interpreting a band of light that triggers your red and blue sensing nerves, but no green is sensed. The actual band of light we can see goes from red to green to blue. Purple doesn't fall between those colors, meaning it wouldn't be included in a rainbow, and isn't any "pure" light you could see, since it doesn't fall on the spectrum.

Essentially, any time you see purple, you're seeing two different frequencies of light that your mind interprets as a single frequency.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago) (1 children)

Your definition of color is based only on human perception? Is purple a color for a mantis shrimp?

Edit: I guess not in a pure sense because it's still two wavelengths of light. Perhaps a mantis shrimp can detect a totally different wavelength and sees it as "purple" or something.

Now I'm thinking about how we don't know how other humans interpret colors. Like what I see as red, you may see as blue. Ugh.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Definition I'm using is any color that can be expressed as a single wavelength of light. Purple cannot be, since it's actually two wavelengths simultaneously.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

What is violet at the end of the visible spectrum, then? We call the higher wavelength stuff ultraviolet, and violet looks purple to me, so I'm having trouble reconciling this stuff with what you're saying.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

We call it that but our eyes see the far end frequency as a colour that only very slightly activates blue sensitive cone receptors and no others. For red sensitive cones there is a slight bump in the high end frequencies also that makes it possible for them to look violet as it activates the blue sensitive and a bit of red sensitive receptors but a much purpler purple is made by combining high and low frequencies.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Normalized-spectral-sensitivity-of-retinal-rod-and-cone-cells_fig7_265155524

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

There is evidence to show that violet does actually weakly activates red cones too. This is because the violet light starts creeping up to double the frequency of the lower end of the red sensitivity, and so it can actually successfully activate it very weakly. There are other factors that can lessen or even fully negate that effect though, it's all kind of fuzzy.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 55 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That's because the scientific definition of berries has little in common with the colloquial one. That doesn't make either wrong, they are just used in different contexts

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We really should rename botanical berries to something else.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The thing is, there is for sure some Latin technical term that you can use. And it's still close enough to berries to call them that.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Oh probably, but I don't speak latin. Most people don't speak latin; there's like 1000 people in the world maximum who could hold a conversation in latin.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 8 hours ago

Botanical vs culinary.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Ah! A person of rare and refined taste!

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

A berry is a watery, often sweet fruit under 4cm

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That is the colloquial definition. The scientific definition of a berry differs a bit.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net -3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, well scientists just like making things more complicated so they can feel important

If it's a small fruit you can pop in your mouth without a stone, it's a berry

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Don’t be a lemon

[–] TheAmishMan@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Pumpkin pie also rarely is made with pumpkin, it's usually squash

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Pumpkin pie is gross. Apple is the superior turkey-day pie.

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 35 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Pumpkin pie is always made with squash. Occasionally, those squash are pumpkins

[–] sconniecrow@midwest.social 16 points 7 hours ago

Pumpkin is a squash

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Having made pumpkin pies for decades, this is true. Pumpkin is a squash.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago (3 children)
[–] FierySpectre@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Botanically speaking they are correct.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

With great effort, I imagine. A pumpkin is also a squash.

Pumpkins are cool

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Sir, this is a berry.