this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
359 points (84.6% liked)

Comics

5950 readers
119 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 98 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Every time I see something like this I'm reminded of Plato recording Socrates' whinging that books are destroying society and no one can remember anything anymore.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Damn smartphones, ruining society!

Damn internet, ruining society!

Damn computers, ruining society!

Damn VIDYA GAMES, ruining society!

Damn TV, ruining society!

Damn radio, ruining society!

Damn Newspapers, ruining society!

Damn 2 piece swimsuits, ruining society!

Damn books, ruining society!

Damn clay tablets, ruining society!

Damn language, ruining society!

Damn alphabet, ruining society!

Damn humans, ruining society!

Damn society, ruining society!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

i dont think this is commentary about phones, specifically. more like we work, machines play.

wrong choice of imagery by the artist perhaps

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I think its message is only hindered by those viewing it. Not that their perspective is invalid, but I do think its far more likely the intent here was to highlight how the relationship between humans and machines has seemingly flipped.

[–] arken@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, the interesting thing about that quote is that Socrates was completely correct. People used to be able to recall long epic poems from memory, not just one, but an entire book shelf's worth of information. This ability was lost among people in general. However people, and society, adapted.

Although the argument you and a lot of other people seems to be making is the equivalent of saying "well, I've had cancer before, and the doctor said it was serious then, but I survived - so it's going to fine this time as well". I don't think it holds up.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, the interesting thing about that quote is that Socrates was completely correct. People used to be able to recall long epic poems from memory, not just one, but an entire book shelf's worth of information

I'm not convinced that people in general could ever do that. Or rather, not in any way that we've lost.

Ask a kid to tell you the lore from their favorite game, and they'll recite books worth of information if you let them. You just don't care about that content, so you think they're stupid instead.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I literally cannot believe how much this says about society

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

This one really makes ya think

[–] fjordbasa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

We live in a society!

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Ahhh yes, the old "reading on paper is big brain individual, reading on phone is mindless."

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Same with "communicating over the internet isn't real communication."

I'm not saying that there aren't problems with how much we're communicating over the internet and how little we're communicating in real life, but the vast majority of humans in history would have considered the ability to send text messages to someone on the other side of the world in less than a second to be reserved for the gods above.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For real! This is like saying "telegrams are destroying our youth" back in the day.

Sure, real human interaction has value, but the ability to text someone on the other side of the planet instantly and have it translated is a huge leap forward not brain rot.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Those cuneiform clay tablets are dragging our youths from proper honest upbringing" - old people, c.a. 3400 BCE

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Interesting takeaway.

In my opinion this piece is a critique of how humans are stuck working even while commuting, while at the same time we have robots learning how to read, write, and draw.

Seems to be the relationship has flipped, wouldnt you say?

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

You saw a collection of trees, but not the forest, eh?

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 month ago (4 children)

AI has the free time to study and be artistic. Not us. We must pay to exist.

What rent does the AI pay? Nothing.

No internet bill, no transportation bill, no phone bill, no food bill, no Healthcare/insurance bill.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

AI also isn't studying or being artistic. It has no real awareness of the concepts it's seemingly learning, at least not yet. AI as of right now is basically just statistical analysis of human-made information and art and predictive modelling of how a human might respond to a given prompt.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

AI as of right now

AI for the forseeable future

No need to mince words. Far too much of this terrible hype surrounding it is built on pure speculation of a future that we have no hard evidence is approaching. Just bold claims by people financially invested in selling the hype.

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Someday, if it can sustain itself, it would need to pay for a living.

Right now, someone wants to have an AI. The person pays for it like a pet. But its too expensive, so it needs to give something in return.

We will see if it really benefited the energy costs and internet costs for those Companies who use intense amount of resources for AI.

load more comments (2 replies)

im[$USER_AGE]andthisisdeep

[–] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Phone bad!!!!

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

everyone keep focussing on the using phone part and missed the part where the humans are still doing menial labor while the robots are doing what people would do to enjoy themselves.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

while the robots are doing what people would do to enjoy themselves.

and for the specific purpose of increasing profit margins of media companies who no longer have to pay artists and writers

If generative AI was merely a computer science endeavour, the 1% wouldn't be investing this heavily in it.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Apparently most the people in this post are under 25 and are still dealing with their parents telling them to get off their phone on the daily.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not like the machines understand what they are reading.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But you can read on your phone

[–] xav@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You could. But instead you're doomscrolling on the fediverse.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

sounds to me like they're actually hopeposting, which is the opposite of doomscrolling

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

In my, and I'd say most of our defense, I do learn a lot on here. And I'm not on here anywhere near as much as I was on Reddit.

[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

whos the artist?

EDIT: Thanks for adding the source to the body! To everyone else: https://mastodon.social/@sohel9320/113312549620891784

sohel9320@mastodon.social

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] SurfinBird@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

ai has stolen the artists' job, now we must do what it can't do: good art.

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This doesn't need to be picked part to be appreciated

[–] RickAstleyfounddead@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago

We are training AI so they can "draw" Wow!!!!

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί