this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
385 points (99.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4076 readers
64 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wrightfi@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As a landlord (I own two properties) and as someone who also works full time I agree with him.

It may take up some time but ultimately it's an investment.

Landlords like myself aren't (typically) struggling, so we should pay more tax, especially now as the country needs it. I am proud to say I don't tax dodge and pay what I owe. But unfortunately there are many loopholes that can be exploited to avoid paying tax. Just a few weeks ago someone was telling me how I should put my properties under a LTD company to avoid paying tax (I didn't and won't). I hope the Labour government does more to close these loopholes for tax dodgers.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago
[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Owning shit isn't working. Why is this controversial?

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Because the right wing media wants it to be. The answer is simple.

Cool if owning property is work. Let's abolish capital gains tax and charge it as income.

Because at the end of it. That is what the telegraph etc is saying. They are trying to argue Starmer agreed to hold all taxes when the manifesto clearly stated working taxes.

Cool call their bluff all capital gains is now charged as income tax.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ynazuma@lemmy.world 106 points 5 days ago (6 children)

That is correct. They might work, but in context they are not “working people”

Here “working people” is synonymous with “working class”. Thus, not landlords and shareholders obviously

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 85 points 5 days ago (18 children)

Based from Starmer there.

Landlords and shareholders aren't working people.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This might be my favourite thing he's said yet

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 26 points 5 days ago

In a country like UK... He just pissed off a lot of parasites.

And thats a good thing! They got too comfortable over last 40 years.

UK is fucking gutted from within, and peasants accept it lol

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 69 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Comrade Starmer lmao

He's right though. I'd very much like a PM to take a hard line on these chuckle fucks.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

Nothing "comrade" about it. It's just sense.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 25 points 5 days ago (5 children)

He definitely is. It's refreshing to finally even hear this sentiment from our government. However it's just words, hopefully we start seeing some positive changes in the rental and housing market.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 days ago

I'm super dubious because Starmer has done very little to earn my trust, but I would be very keen to be surprised, or even proven wrong

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] elgordino@fedia.io 75 points 5 days ago

Truth hurts I guess.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That may be the first thing he said that I agree with him on ever.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 17 points 4 days ago

I dont often agree with this Tory in disguise, but in this case he's right.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago

I mean, he's right. The whole point of my mother leveraging her home to become a landlord back then was because she had a stroke and literally could-not-work. Landlords aren't working class. They're just investors.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 44 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Of course they're not working people. They are leveraging capital to give them an income. That is not the same as chopping wood and carrying water.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 38 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And, as everyone here says. He is correct. It is an investment. Not work. Yes you are taking a risk, that is the point. If you work, you should not be taking a risk. But instead paid for your labour.

Unfortunately, saying it here doesn't matter. Papers like the telegraph and other Tory press are not going to care about the facts. They only care about creating division.

More importantly, Starmer et al. Are also not going to make the effort to argue this case. No effort is going to be made to push forward the true difference between working class income and actual investment income.

Anyone watching saw this argument starting during the election. It was clear then when labour started talking about working taxes. The Tories instantly started arguing that the Tories were talking about not raising taxers at all. Anyone watching saw this discussion forming.

And Starmer et al. intentionally ignored it rather than draw attention to the difference. They will not bother to fight the terminology now either.

[–] MrSilkworm@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago

Because he is correct

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

They do no labor, they create no good, they accomplish no service. Literal rent-seeking.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 5 days ago

Well I remember when I used to rent I don't remember my landlord ever doing anything. He owns the property but he certainly didn't maintain it.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I don’t know why they seem to think they are. Yes some landlords do labor, but that labor is to maintain and improve value of their income from owning things.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›