this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
101 points (89.1% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
2651 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleur_@lemm.ee 36 points 3 weeks ago

Is this genuine? Like is the unit circle really fucking you up that bad?

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm pretty dumb, so I don't understand this one.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pythagorean theorem.

Although, don't solve this or else Pythagoras might throw you off of a boat

[–] CoconutPetesPaella@lemmy.one 17 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty sure this is Pythagorean Identity, theorem is a²+b²=c²

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably that trigonometry is the highest math the average person will take?

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 5 points 2 weeks ago

I got to calculus 2 and proceeded to forget everything through algebra II once I took a break from math for a semester.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

You leave my unit circle alone!

[–] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, sohcahtoa. Not to be confused with

img

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

Thx, this is not helpful, but I will never be able to think of it any other way now

[–] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Sine of theta is the ratio of the lengths of the Opposite side over the Hypotenuse (SOH). Cosine of theta is Adjacent over Hypotenuse (CAH). Tangent of theta is Opposite over Adjacent (TOA).

[–] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oh you're saying opposite site and adjacent site in English

Anyway how is the r=1 circle harmful for that?

It's not. It's just one of those things that people groan about because when you first learn it the concept is confusing. After about 15 minutes of instruction on a unit circle, it's not a big deal at all.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How do you know which one is "opposite" and adjacent? They could literally be exactly the same but in any case they both touch the hypotenuse?

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Adjacent or opposite to the angle you're referring to.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So the picture is wrong then, the marked angle is top right (and the right angle, of course), the other angle is not marked, so adjacent and opposite are swapped.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

The one with the Jedi? Yes, was wondering about that too. If you get through the trouble creating something like that you should really try to make it right.

[–] NigelSimmons@startrek.website 14 points 3 weeks ago

Believe this was featured in a paper that recently used trig to prove the Pythagorean theorem (previously thought to be a circular definition). I think some highschoolers cracked it as part of a mathematics challenge or something.

[–] swab148@startrek.website 5 points 3 weeks ago

Someone needs to turn this into loss

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It was freely chosen for simplicity.

If you choose another R, the other sides (x and y) become R*cos(th) and R*sin(th)

I don't understand what is harmful about the unity circle either.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Any circle could have its radius technically be 1, as long as you set the units of measurement so that 1 equals the radius of the circle.

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

units? what are those? I never use units, or pay attention to capitals. pure math ftw, baby!

spoilerRapidly hides from the science professors

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pure math uses units. Like they say "1 unit"

[–] within_epsilon@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes the units are given cute names like "wiggly waggly units" to make physicists cringe. Acknowledging a unit with cute names when the unit is not important is entertaining.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 6 points 3 weeks ago

Because it's a unit circle.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

for the same reason that rulers start with 1, it would be utterly pointless to use anything else.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Your ruler starts with 1? How do you measure stuff between 0 and 1?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

those are unlabeled, have you ever seen a ruler?

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Zero is not unlabelled lol

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

I am fascinated, can you show a picture

[–] openrain502r@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm fine doing SOH CAH TOA, but the unit circle can go fuck itself. Same with radians.

[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

SOH CAH TOA is just a trick to make rote memorization of procedure easier. Understanding the unit circle will let you understand what trigonometry is actually doing.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, dividing a circle into 360 parts, then subdividing those by 60, and further subdividing those by 60 makes so much more sense than just using ratio of a number fundamental to circles themselves.

[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Took me a minute to notice, but it was worth it

[–] prex@aussie.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago

Notice what??

You can use the spoiler tagNo spoiler

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Notice what, exactly. I still don't get it.

[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Take a look again, it's still there

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I only see the double arrows.

[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When you look at it for a minute, your phone will dim the screen and in reflection you'll see the person who has harmed you.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

I've seen it! The bastard!