this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
93 points (98.9% liked)

Games

16796 readers
630 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GenitalHurricane@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Worth mentioning to anyone who is excited for a possible new version of this title but hates AAA ethics, OpenTTD is FOSS and pretty good.

Alternatively if you'd like a modern take on this, Mashinky is super good and was made by a 1-man studio. It's also beautiful. (And multiplayer!)

[–] Vikthor@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The first thing that crossed my mind is that they might try to cancel OpenTTD. Chris Sawyer reportedly wasn't too happy about OpenTTD but didn't too much against it, maybe recognising that it is a fan tribute. Nobody can expect that of Ataris's corporate lawyers.

[–] GenitalHurricane@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

This comment makes me sad because you are probably right. Mashinky it is!

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not like they can do anything about it. OpenTTD does not even use any of the original assets anymore.

[–] Vikthor@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The code might still be a derivative work.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This sounds rather bad for Open Transport Tycoon Deluxe (https://www.openttd.org/)

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I didn't realize Atari owned most of those style games, they basically deadlocked that market to themselves, interesting

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They have a crazy history of buying and selling companies and IPs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_SA#History

When they have good times they buy what they can, then when they hit hard times it all ends up offered in a fire sale.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

thanks, patent laws

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago

For anyone going "Atari still exists?" - it's complicated. And stupid. It is equal parts complicated and stupid.

Atari was purchased by Warner in 1976 when they were still "that Pong company." The home-gizmo division was sold to Jack Tramiel shortly after the crash of '83.

The remaining arcade division took a journey. Tramiel had bought the name Atari, and also most of the staff and facilities and licensing rights, so Warner was left with a generic video-game husk which they spun off as AT Games, AKA Tengen. For some reason Namco owned most of it. Uuuntil Time Warner bought them back, and renamed them Time Warner Interactive, and then very shortly sold them to Midway, under Bally. Under Williams. That pinball conglomerate situation restored the proper Atari Games name, and then very shortly rebranded everything as Midway. This Atari did pretty well as Midway West until arcades stopped existing and they went bankrupt. And then Warner bought them again. They still own them, even though all Warner wanted was the Mortal Kombat IP.

Meanwhile.

The home division released a fascinating variety of consoles and microcomputers that do not matter in the slightest. Everything after the 2600 was a complete footnote. Their final lineup of the Lynx, the Falcon, and the Jaguar are only interesting to engineering ultranerds. Obviously they went bankrupt. Hasbro bought their remains, then spun them off into Mattel Interactive, which also went bankrupt. Hard drive manufacturer JTS bought their remains (for some reason?) and did the smartest thing anyone has ever done with Atari: nothing.

Infogrames screwed that up by buying JTS simply the acquire the Atari brand, which they proceeded to wear like a dead skin mask. They made a few admirable titles like Gauntlet Legends before entering a death spiral of hocking classic IP to stay solvent. It didn't work. They went bankrupt. Some oil-adjacent venture-capital robot bought their remains, spent a decade hawking vaporware, released a weird PC nobody bought, and then also went bankrupt. A different clique of venture capitalists gave them more money, for some reason, and started reacquiring old franchises from all eras. They're the Atari that re-released the 2600 last year, as if it'd be a big deal instead of a curiosity. I have obvious predictions for where this all goes, and yet, I cannot imagine that's where it ends.

That logo is like a cursed artifact in a horror movie. Sensible companies see it laying there, and talk themselves into putting it on, and oh no everything went wrong somehow.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Atari? Don't they mean Infogrames?

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They renamed themselves to atari after buying atari

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

To add to the confusion Atari announced earlier this year that they would restore the Infogrames brand as a publishing label.

Now we get stuff like this :

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, so they mean Infogrames.

The current Atari is Atari in name only.