this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
75 points (85.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers
414 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So, do any pirates here have a grasp in what this asshole feels towards piracy in general? Should we be worried? I'm worried he'll install an FCC that'll work against internet rights, that's one concern.

I'd like to hear what thoughts you have.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Even if it's not directly related to piracy, he will try to censor the internet in ways that will harm your possibilities of consuming pirated content.

Get a vpn. From a country that doesn't make part of the 14 eyes, with real no-logs policy and, if possible, that accepts cash, crypto or prepaid cards. Ditch windows too.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 weeks ago

PSA: all women in Trumpistan should be especially very mindful of state-level surveillance of their internet use, whether or not they pirate stuff. But this is also good advice for all pirates.

[–] Xianshi@lemm.ee 63 points 2 weeks ago

He'll do whatever makes his buddies the most money.

[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 45 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

He is not going to appoint someone to the FCC. He is going to get rid of it. ISPs are going to be free to do whatever they want with no federal interference.

[–] flork@lemy.lol 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's not going to "get rid of it", he's going to corrupt it. Give spectrum to the biggest donors, reverse net neutrality, get rid of antitrust, revoke broadcast licenses of anyone who criticizes him.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

reverse net neutrality

Hate to break it to you, that was already ruined in the Obama administration

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

In Markdown you need to add a blank line between the quoted section and your response to it otherwise your response will be included in the quote.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That also means people can do whatever they want with spectrum. Gonna fuck with Starlink and all kinds of other communications. Afterall, with no FCC, y'all can do whatever you want.

[–] flork@lemy.lol 8 points 1 week ago

This won't happen, what will happen is that he revokes the broadcast license of anyone who criticizes the administration and removes all consumer protections against privacy and surveillance. he will repeal section 230 for everyone except X and Truth social.

[–] Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org -4 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Which might be a blessing in disguise? I mean, for the ISPs that have been actively fighting corporate interests from telling them what to do. With no governmental branch telling them what to do and not wanting to lose many subscribers lest they risk going out of business, then isn't that a net positive?

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This would be a double edged sword. Without regulation, the ISP will work in whichever way grants them the most money.

This means that they probably won't go after copyright claims unless the rightsholders pay them first, but they will ramp up data collection efforts to sell to brokerage firms and will also engage in rate-limiting on high-bandwith use cases like streaming or torrenting unless you pay extra.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

$1/mb is now the only plan in your area.

ISPs generally have few to zero competition, so I expect this will generally be awful in face of deregulation.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

My local ISP is run by Trumpers out of one little office nearby

I'd love a final reason to firebomb them after all the bullshit, honestly

[–] safesyrup@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Like 1$ for every mb/s or for every mb downloaded?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago

The intended chair is a huge fan of data caps to increase profits, so I’ll give you one guess.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

With no government oversight, and the nation already cut up into segments by the ISPs so that they have monopolies in their areas, you think the free market is suddenly going to start working like Ancaps say it will and regulate itself in a way that’s good for consumers?

If you’re the kind of person to believe something like that, then I have a new cryptocurrency you should buy from me. Guaranteed to go to the moon, no rug pull. Trust me, bro.

Facebook is now $5.00 a month charge

Steam access is $20.00 charge

Countries without net Neutrality are like this. If I believe correctly Belgium is like this.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There will be a branch of government telling them what to do. It will just be the courts, as they're sued into oblivion by IP rights holders.

[–] Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

But that's like what's already been happening. It'll just be business as usual.

[–] flork@lemy.lol 1 points 1 week ago

He won't just get rid of it, he will wield it as a weapon against anyone who criticizes his administration

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I for one welcome the new piracy arms race, every time someone tries to stop piracy, piracy gets easier and more efficient.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Especially if they try to ban porn as outlined in Project 2025

[–] Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 week ago

Good luck trying to essentially end one of the biggest industries that's partly in contributing on keeping the country going.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

We might have to ban the government with nukes

I don't think he's been vocal one way or another about piracy, but i wouldn't be surprised if he appointed a fresh group of jackoffs with something to prove

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Everything will be fine unless someone shows him an active torrent of The Apprentice and explains he doesn’t get paid residuals if people watch it that way.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

is he paid residuals for theater and streaming sales? 🤮 if so, this would be a great reason to pirate it.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well he's going to make it nigh-impossible to afford electronic equipment or compute power.

Piracy may be fine, but the tools that facilitate it will be broken.

Get what you can now, and embrace the return to sneakernets.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 weeks ago

I doubt he knows what it is but at least one of his fascist collaborators probably do.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

His deputy (Barr) said that criminal use of VPNs should be looked into but nothing became of that.

This happened like more than 4 years ago so I could be wrong. Someone correct me if I am

EDIT: He wanted all encryption to have backdoors

https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/us-attorney-general-demands-encryption-backdoors-at-all-costs-and-for-you-to-just-accept-it/

[–] S13Ni@lemmy.studio 10 points 2 weeks ago

Probably not too much so his big tech friends can scrape all data they need.

[–] SitD@lemy.lol 10 points 1 week ago

the last 16 years had 4 years of republican rule. the democrats are very responsible for the fact that the feds are going after pirates (crime against rich stakeholders) instead of crimes against the members of the general American demographic as a principle.

the change from public servants to corporate military is a bipartisan problem, folks

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

oh yeah, it's all gone, he's for the oligarch media owners, expect pirate sites to be nuked across the board, expect internet access to be 10x more expensive, expect vpn's to be curtailed if not outlawed outright. it's the end of all things. this is no hyperbole.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

Eh, not necessarily. Hollywood hates piracy and Trump hates Hollywood, it might actually be as simple as that.

Intriguing nonetheless, I would say it will be the usual pushback and blowback.

https://old.bitchute.com/video/5KQFR00huron/

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 weeks ago

Worry is the worst use of imagination. The latter can take you all sorts of places, whereas the former is more of a rocking chair: misleadingly distracting but essentially stationary. 🙇🏽‍♂️