288
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

During a meeting with House Republicans, President-elect Donald Trump publicly mocked Elon Musk, saying, “Elon won’t go home. I can’t get rid of him,” as Musk has spent extensive time with Trump recently.

The comments were seen as an assertion of Trump’s dominance, with MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell noting the uncomfortable laughter from the room.

Musk has been tapped to co-lead the new "Department of Government Efficiency" (nicknamed "DOGE"), a role critics describe as superficial.

Observers predict Trump and Musk’s alliance may sour due to their clashing egos.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 159 points 2 years ago

He's fucking your wife, turd. That's why he won't go away.

[-] jagermo@feddit.org 59 points 2 years ago

Oh, that would be hilarious to watch, especially if they both sick their fanbase at each other.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 20 points 2 years ago

Like, watching the consequences... Right?
Not the actual fucking. Right?

[-] jagermo@feddit.org 5 points 2 years ago
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It’s not kinkshaming to have no interest in watching a plastic Barbie convertible fuck a Cybertruck.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I would sooooo love that. I would think all the fanbois of the broligarchy would not know quite what to do. They worship donvict and all of his thugs; if Elon and donvict turn on each other and get really nasty, it will be like Mommy and Daddy getting divorced! Who will they choose to live with?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

Holy hell that's disturbing.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure either Must or Trump can get it up at this point. It explains their constant need for attention and validation.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

That would be funny, but is she even at mar-a-lardo? I would think she'd be several states away, banging her tennis instructor or whatever.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 116 points 2 years ago

co-lead

The department of government efficiency

This joke writes itself...

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Look, they don't give a damn about actually following their own philosophies so let's drop the tired gotchas. They don't give a flying fuck about the gotchas.

We are really letting the right wing dictate the nature of reality with bullshit takes like this.

That you need one single leader to solve it all is a conservative position. That you need many people working together is a leftist position.

When you try to hit them with this gotcha you're actually affirming their beliefs in singular strongmen and are normalizing it for the left.

Cooperation shouldn't be vilified. Cooperation isn't a joke.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Keep up the gotchas, just pair them with emphasis on how weak and ineffectual they are. Both are required. One is insufficient.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -5 points 2 years ago

Oh hey, someone with a brain! I was beginning to think non-morons on the internet were a thing of the past.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Department Of Government Efficiency. DOGE

The name itself is a fucking joke about Elons pet Cryptocoin.

[-] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Elon can get fucked. Doge doesn't belong to him.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Do only good everyday....fuck musk and trump

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

The most annoying thing is that in most acronyms two letter words are usually ignored. Thusly it would be DGE but musk is a brain dead Saxon African deserving of little more than a shotgun enema, so why should I expect any ammount of intelligence.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

Assistant TO the Government Efficiency Director

[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 111 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's nice to know cracks are beginning to appear in his administration not even 10 days post-election. The more people opposing Trump the better for almost everyone. Even if it's bastards opposing bastards.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

One can hope there is plenty more of that before they even get into office...

[-] hatecoach@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I approve this message.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 82 points 2 years ago

Best case scenario for the country would be that these egomaniacs trip over themselves before they can accomplish too much harm.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

That’s a bit of an exaggerated headline.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

100%.

I agree with the assertion though. These are the two biggest egos in America, and there's no way they get along for long.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Yeah, it was a light joke.

[-] rothaine@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah can we not do this again? We don't need a news article any time Trump blinks. Like, there's plenty of bad and crazy shit he's doing as-is, no need to mountain all the molehills.

This is part of the reason the "90% of stuff you hear about Trump is bullshit" narrative currently being pushed by right-wing social media is working so well.

[-] JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Sounds pretty humiliating to me. Fuck both of them

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 35 points 2 years ago

Elon is that one guy who invited himself to the party and won't leave even when all the other guests have left.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 years ago
[-] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

The cycle of abuse. Putin, Trump, and Elon are just one dysfunctional family.

[-] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 years ago

(nicknamed "DOGE"),

OMG naming the department (and firing people) is why he wanted this job...

[-] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a kink. 🤷🏿‍♀️

[-] whygohomie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Who could have foresaw that two narcissists in an alliance of convenience would soon tire of each other.?

Weird.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

These people seemingly love to play cuck for one another, though. I mean, donvict likely did his DJ sesh thanks to hating Noem. He and "little" Marco have bagged on each other how much?

This was donvict saying this:

When Elon Musk came to the White House asking me for help on all of his many subsidized projects, whether it’s electric cars that don’t drive long enough, driverless cars that crash, or rocketships to nowhere, without which subsidies he’d be worthless, and telling me how he was a big Trump fan and Republican, I could have said, ‘drop to your knees and beg,’ and he would have done it.

So, donvict is implying that Elon would have blown donvict. We all know that is what he is saying here.

And Elon's back for more of that, I guess? I guess he is just not rich enough already? Seriously, Elon could fuck off with his billions right now and never have to get involved in politics at all, and never have to "work" ever again (I doubt what he does would constitute what most would consider "work", but...) but I guess he's just as much of a narcissist as the rest of these assholes.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 2 years ago

He’s into it.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh that isn't even a flyspeck on the window compared to the shit he does to his 'allies' when he needs a fallguy or simply gets tired of them. And something tells me Elon won't be so accepting of his role as orange man's personal doormat so this will be interesting to watch in a morbid way if nothing else.

[-] Chivera@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The enemy of my enemy

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
288 points (95.3% liked)

politics

31142 readers
2201 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS