this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
272 points (84.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21355 readers
1402 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] yistdaj@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

    Anecdotal, but I have had bad experiences using Ubuntu. I know it's not a bad distro, and that it contributes a lot (especially historically), but it's the other distros that take their contributions and add to it that I find worth using or recommending, or sometimes an unrelated distro. It's the sort of thing I might give money to, but I'll never want to use directly.

    I think this is what people mean when they say it's bad - that distros that take what Ubuntu made and add their own touch seem more user friendly.

    [–] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    I was pretty neutral towards Ubuntu, up until an automatic system update removed my deb Firefox and replaced it with the snap version, even though I specifically set the apt repo to a higher priority.

    The entire reason I left Windows is because I don't want (for example) Edge shoved down my throat after every update, and yet Ubuntu has gone and done the exact same thing with snaps.

    After literal hours of fighting, the only solution I found was to fully disable automatic updates. With Pop OS I have all the benefits of Ubuntu, but I also get a company (System76) that does cool stuff and doesn't try shoving snaps down my throat.

    [–] accideath@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

    Yea, that’s pretty much the reason I always go for mint, when I need something that just works

    Ooohh yeah fuck that. That..doesn't sit well with me at all

    [–] sirico@feddit.uk 38 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

    The snaps bad echo chamber

    Snaps bad because proprietary

    Pre installed Nvidia good because propriety no wait video games!

    Ubuntu's mission was always to build bridges between the user and tech and businesses that the gnu side of Linux wouldn't.

    It's a good just works distro that has spawned a ton of just works distros and sane server defaults. I see Ubuntu on the same level as macos.

    [–] Laser@feddit.org 25 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    I don't like snaps because it's just another Canonical NIH thing. Everyone else agreed on flatpak which seems to have a good design with portals and all and being fully open.

    On the other hand, you have snaps, which is being controlled by Canonical as the server component is l non-public. The packages sometimes work worse than normal debs and the flatpak version (steam being a notable example IIRC).

    There is 0 motivation for me as a user to look into that. They have solved the problem in one of the worst ways possible. Even Mint, which is Ubuntu's biggest downstream, has opted against including it by default.

    In addition to all of that, Canonical also installs applications as snap when using the apt\£* command line tools.

    So you have a system that is

    • proprietary
    • worse than the alternatives
    • pushed on users even through unexpected channels

    Ubuntu's mission was always to build bridges between the user and tech and businesses that the gnu side of Linux wouldn't.

    Which bridge did they build with snaps?

    It's a good just works distro that has spawned a ton of just works distros

    Which in turn have removed snaps by default and replaced the affected packages with native ones because it often didn't "just work"

    [–] tsugu@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

    I like Snaps. They can do more than Flatpak and when packaged well they just work. Sadly some apps on Snapcraft are abandoned or they just don't work, but the same can be said about Flathub.

    Which bridge did they build with snaps?

    Proprietary companies are compelled to release on Snapcraft because it gives them advantages over other packaging methods. I'm just a user but I heard Snaps are easy to work with thanks to the documentation.

    In addition to all of that, Canonical also installs applications as snap when using the apt\£* command line tools.

    Firefox for example isn't even in their apt repos. So instead of throwing an error, the Firefox meta package installs the snap, and tells you it's doing that.

    But I understand that Ubuntu isn't for you if you want to avoid snaps.

    [–] Laser@feddit.org 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

    Everyone should use what suits them best. My negative opinion on snaps doesn't mean Ubuntu shouldn't ship it or that users shouldn't use it. It's Canonical's distribution, they can put into it whatever they want for all I care, and if users are happy with it, good for them. But I can still criticize it for perceived issues. (Edit: kind of a straw man since nobody said I couldn't, I just wanted to stress that I'm not authoritative on the matter)

    But I understand that Ubuntu isn’t for you if you want to avoid snaps.

    I used Ubuntu in the past, from I think 2004 or maybe 2005 to 2008, but switched away because of other issues that I don't remember anymore, but I do remember upgrades between major versions were always pain with an Nvidia card (this was before AMD or in the beginning even ATI cards were well-usable under Linux) and I honestly just prefer rolling release nowadays. But snaps are just not at all compelling anyways.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Allero@lemmy.today 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    Proprietary Nvidia drivers are seen as a necessity, not a "good thing", which is why Nvidia was repeatedly pressured to give up the code. Open-source Nvidia drivers suck in all applications, and if you don't need anything demanding, you probably wouldn't have a solid Nvidia card in the first place.

    Gnu side of Linux tries to change the practices used by said businesses, and the more people embrace it, the more pressured companies become to be compliant.

    Any sane copyleft activist (of which there are many in the Linux world) sees this change as a betrayal; security experts and enthusiasts are also not happy about a program doing something unknown sitting on their system.

    [–] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (4 children)
    [–] bastion@feddit.nl 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

    Snaps bad because shoving updates down throats.

    [–] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

    snaps bad because

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Naich@lemmings.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    The only reason I don't like snap is because useful mount information gets buried in 5 million "loop" mounts.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 6 days ago

    I learned better in 2012 when they tried to put an Amazon search bar in their start menu, the same thing people are complaining about with windows today.

    If I wanted to use corposhit I would have stayed with windows.

    [–] starbrite@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

    I'd love ubuntu, my only real problem with it is it's owned by a company and not community backed

    [–] avieshek@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (7 children)

    Try Pop!_OS if you love Ubuntu

    [–] lengau@midwest.social 3 points 5 days ago

    Isn't Pop OS just System76's spin on Ubuntu?

    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    Canonical wants to be Microsoft so goddamn bad they can taste it

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    I am still pissed at Ubuntu

    [–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

    As you should be.

    [–] pewpew@feddit.it 10 points 5 days ago

    Kubuntu is boring because it just works

    [–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (8 children)

    I don't get why anybody uses Ubuntu. Just use Debian. It's basically more stable and functional Ubuntu, but without snaps and you don't need an entire distro branch for different DEs.

    [–] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Because it's a popular distro. Because when you look for “how to X in linux”, there's a 90% chance the response will be about Ubuntu. Because your workplace said so. The list goes on.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 days ago

    Because you don't have to know what to do already if you start with Ubuntu. You have to know your way around the Linux world more if you use Debian

    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Other than snaps, gnome, and the fucking painful default taskbar it's pretty good yeah. It just works™️.

    [–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

    I hate GNOME lol, I wouldn't be using Linux today if I had stuck with Ubuntu. If you like it, that's cool. I respect it, I just can't stand using it myself.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.kya.moe 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

    I despise ubuntu solely because of snap

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    I'm a very happy Manjaro user and have been for more than 5 years.

    Let's just say it doesn't seem to be a popular opinion around here!

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    it uses snap (less packages and security than flatpak), app.armor (less secure than Selinux), has a history of anti-privacy integrations (like sending user keystrokes to amazon), still collects some user data. Tumbleweed is better. Great kde implementation, strong security, a lot of cutting-edge software, stability, beginner-friendly

    [–] tsugu@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    False (except for less packages, that's true), false, the amazon incident was a honest mistake and only applied to the search bar in unity (even more specifically the amazon lense), and no data is being collected unless you enable it during the install. https://youtu.be/rdPt8WB1lZw

    Also are you serious? A rolling release distro with automated package builds being more secure? Last time I checked Tumbleweed got affected by the XZ exploit.

    [–] agelord@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    sending user keystrokes to Amazon

    That's a very serious allegation to make without citing any source.

    Still collects some user data

    Someone has already pointed out, no data is collected unless the user opts in. But, my question is what's wrong with collecting anonyomized telemetry about most used hardware and most used/unused software features? It helps developers make better decisions.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] edg@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    Ubuntu in ~2015 was peak Linux (for me). Everything worked flawlessly with zero bugs, even printers. It's been downhill ever since with the exception of Steam Proton, but even then I've had more bugs with Steam in the past couple years then I did in 2013.

    [–] TheGingerNut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

    If you're going to shill a corpo distro, at least shill a decent one like fedora.

    [–] tsugu@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

    Lmao. As if corporate operating systems were bad. What makes RedHat that much better tho? I want to know. From what I've seen they are both bringing a lot of value to the FOSS space.

    [–] TheGingerNut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
    • Fedora makes very minimal changes to downstream. The gnome experience on fedora is the experience the devs intended, for better or worse.
    • It often experiments with new technologies. It was the first to ship pulseaudio out of box. And then again for pipewire. And if it wasn't the first to install wayland by default, it probably was the first to stop shipping XOrg out of box.
    • It doesn't install snaps instead of native packages when you run rpm install
    • It's also Linus Torvald's distro of choice if that's worth anything
    [–] tsugu@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago
    • In my humble opinion, the stock experience on Gnome sucks. No desktop icons, no dock, no minimize maximize buttons, no app indicators. I only use Gnome because of the changes Ubuntu made to it, which can be replicated on other distros with a script.

    • That's valid. Ubuntu has shipped with wayland by default since some time ago but wasn't the first one. They don't seem to adopt the latest technology as fast. Which I like. Even the new LTS still gives you the option to use X.org in GDM.

    • Also true. If you don't like Snaps and aren't comfortable with more and more packages being replaced by them, Ubuntu isn't the distro to use. I don't mind the metapackages installing snaps instead at all honestly. The terminal clearly says it's installing a snap. And from my experience they work great. I was recently using wsl and needed yt-dlp. I went for the snap right away and it worked great.

    In fact the only broken snaps I have encountered so far are OBS and curl (which can't access root directories, making it useless for the script I needed)

    [–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    Mfw I switch from windows to Ubuntu and I start seeing bad stuff about it

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›