613
Vaping in public is already trash, but being Lauren Boebert at the same time takes it to a new level.
Am vaper. I agree.Wouldn't dream to obscure someone's viewing of a show -- much less while inside of a venue.
I prefer it to stoges, but even the 'analogue' of the habit was relegated to keeping us away from others. As it should be.
I bet you're not a narcissistic politician though.
There are some really inconsiderate vapers and they do things that smokers generally don't do, like blow vapor in your face when you're walking by and, like Boebert, do it indoors. I don't get it. They were likely former smokers and they didn't used to do this shit.
Because "It's harmless!" (It's not...)
That was always the justification I'd hear. Even if it was harmless, it's still rude as hell.
Water is harmless but I don't want you spitting it in my face, asshole..
load more comments
(2 replies)
Dumbass: do you know who I am?
Theatre person: yes and that's why you must go.
It is so cringe when someone asks that. It usually means they don't and you saying that shows your ego is bigger than your brain.
I read somewhere a couple years ago, that in her teens, Boebert used to turn tricks outside the local bars for cigarettes and beer.
Perhaps it’s unfair to highlight that as it’s probably common practice for most of her peer group.
She married a pedophile. She knew he was a pedophile, because she was one of the children he exposed himself to at a bowling alley and thought "he's gonna be my husband one day".
Sexual deviancy is her MO.
Can you explain the expression "turning tricks"?
Just checked on google, it's slang for prostitution.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Here's an actual link to the video of her being escorted out.. https://twitter.com/MeidasTouch/status/1701803040624271545
load more comments
(20 replies)
It'd be hilarious if she was told "yes, and all the more reason to throw you out".
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yeah I know who you are, Boebert. White trash!
Can you vape crack now?
Well if it could be done I'm sure Mike Lindell would be all over it.
Probably just E-Meth.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Literally don't know who that is.
White trash, hard right politician.
I don't know if she's classy enough to be white trash
load more comments
(2 replies)
Some call her Trailer Park Barbie
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
I'll take "Unsurprising But Disappointing Headlines" for $2k...
load more comments
(1 replies)
She's so dumb but thinks she's smart. It'd be a hilarious joke if her constituents weren't even dumber.
She causes a “disturbance” at a venue she is on the board of?
Seems like a Trumpian playbook move to use your celebrity and political office to influence your personal investments.
She's just a bitch. You don't need to call her anyone else's name.
Actually. That could be hilarious.
*visits capital hill
*ambushes boebert
“Hi! I’m like your biggest fan! I love the work your doing…. Can I have your autograph?! Maybe a selfie?”
*startes recording
“Thanks Marjorie!”
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Randy Marsh energy.
Please do not insult Randy Marsh like that.
At least that man has 'Tegrity.
I don't know if Randy Marsh could actually get drunk enough to match Lauren Boebert's level of incoherence.
Well what do you know, a shitty cunt acts like a shitty cunt? Crazy. It's a shame that being a shitty cunt doesn't disqualify you from being in public office like it should.
Glad she was thrown out.
Interesting that she went to this show. I'm guessing it was just to make the headlines like this.
The opening monologue is quite anti-Republican.
She claims she's a big fan of the musical. She said she was singing along too loudly as if singing along was at all appropriate in live theater.
I've flushed turds more intelligent than this idiot.
A bitch, is the correct answer
This woman is a complete fruit, but I will admit that saying "and let me know how it ends!" is mildly amusing, and shows a level of self-awareness that's usually missing from her and her ilk.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Do you know who I am?"
Yes, Karen, we know who you are. Yet despite this, we still let you into our concert. Now you're behaving like a twat, so GTFO.
I think Ted Cruz knows her.
He knows her well.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'm a good Christian woman. I only show 50% boobage at a time. That's the sluttiest Christian in open public eye I've ever seen.
Can we skip to the point where she's just cracked out and depressed already? I can't stand any sign of happiness from her with that "lol I'm so much better than the people that have to follow rules look at me daaaance"
Hate seeing evil people happy for even 10 seconds at a time. Pure sadness and wretched depression from them is all they deserve.
I’m a good Christian woman. I only show 50% boobage at a time.
Yeah, she's a jerk. But can we not just slut shame people. Is that too much to ask?
To be fair, other sluts would be ashamed just being grouped with this seditious traitor. Hoebert is much worse than a slut. She's a cheap politician.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
613 points (96.7% liked)
politics
31194 readers
2513 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS