this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024

223 points (89.1% liked)

Data is Beautiful

5028 readers

1 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

WandererLagomorph770@lemmy.world

STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world

the_ocs@lemmy.world

223

"We" didn't vote for this (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by irreticent@lemmy.world to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.world

72 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/22680392

Thinking of red states vs blue states is busted. Plenty of good visualizations of this over the years, but this election in particular feels really important to point out "We" did not chose this.

When I say we I mean registered US voters, but even less so citizens, and even less so again residents.

Even of the voters who did vote for the GOP candidate, who can say how many really wanted him or his policies vs they just didn't want more of the status quo Dems.

The popular vote tallies in this graphic are out of date too, He definitely didn't win in a landslide the way it can appear with red and blue maps. His win in the popular vote was also pretty small now that more votes have been counted. https://www.thenation.com/.../donald-trump-vote-margin.../

So, what if Biden used broad immunity SCOTUS granted to declare a crisis of democracy - That between massive disinformation campaigns by enemies both foreign and domestic, voter suppression, as well as many other factors, the will of the people can't be discerned from our recent presidential election. That it would be a dereliction of duty both to the people and to his oath to defend the constitution to hand over power to someone whose clear and declared intent is abuse the power of the office to fundamentally reshape or demolish our republic based on this highly suspect and incomplete result (remember, most people didn't even vote)

Here is my off the cuff proposal for what to do after that

A new election, everyone must vote. Trump and Harris on the ballot, but each major party must offer 2 candidates, and we're using Ranked Choice Voting. 1st place gets presidency, 2nd place gets VP.

Biden almost certainly won't do anything like this. He is clearly a coward with a stupid sense of optimism - a "things will be just fine, no need for any drastic measures" ever, mentality, and despite some rhetoric has shown no signs that he thinks there is anything to actually be concerned about from the party which has veered hard towards fascism. But, hey, a guy can dream.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 64 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

If you didn't vote you voted for this

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We didn't vote, for this.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Nice.

[–] PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

maybe not voted but they definitely chose this. choosing to let whatever happens actually happen was a choice.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"I sat on my ass! You're welcome!"

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Major political parties: Absolute shameless corruption and self-dealing while a thriving economy that could support families and rewarding living, sharing the unimaginable wealth of the modern world pretty equitably among any working person, collapses into an Uber-driving no health insurance hellscape. Give vote pls tho

Voters: Man fuck this

Major political parties: Shocked Pikachu face

Voters: Don’t really care about news or politics or really anything except video games and vape, I heard on social media that Biden is bad for the economy and Facebook has never lied to me in the past. I’m going to sit home and whack off instead of trying to effect some positive change in our politics

Trump: Hey just so you know, I’m going to have the military start shooting people I don’t like, pretty much the instant I’m back in power

Voters: Shocked Pikachu face

Edit: Typo

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Yep. I hate everything.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] hornface@fedia.io 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The people who didn't vote may not have actively contributed to this, but they certainly did make a conscious choice to allow it to happen when they had the power to stop it.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a chicken and egg situation -- Bernie Sanders said “It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them”

So do we blame people for being fed up or do we blame the ruling class for giving Americans so little to realistically hope for?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Both. I hate when people present two separate issues as if it takes the ability for the other to be wrong. It's a false dichotomy.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hate to break it to you but "didn't vote" isn't a candidate.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A new election, everyone must vote.

This alone is a huge hurdle. There are people who have no form of ID and we have no free national form of ID, so that rules out any state that hard-requires voter ID. One also cannot assume that these people have the documents required (shitty parents, house fire, homelessness) nor the time and money required to get a state ID. Good luck trying to do a national ID as it brings out the crazies. So there would need to be programs on a per-state level to not only identify these people (as in knowing that there is a person like this in x location right now) but also identifying these people (as in their actual identity) and getting them an ID. This ignores that there are plenty of people who do not want to be identified.

identify all potential eligible voters and their current location for the required parts of the duration of the project
getting them proper ID as per state requirements
getting them to a place to vote
coming up with and enforcing some punishment for those that don't

Edit: Some of the timing hurdles I mention are also people who work two jobs (or more) with basically no time to themselves just to survive, let alone do all of the above (particularly when there is poor or no public transit and they don't drive). I lived out of a car for several months when I was 19 or so and a lot of people are a single paycheck away so don't think it's a non-issue.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

money required to get a state ID

Why wouldn't this be considered a poll tax. There has to be a way for everyone that is legally allowed to vote to do so for free.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Make getting an ID free then? Isn't that what both sides want? Fewer undocumented (by definition) for republicans, and more people voting for Democrats.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not happy seeing my state in yellow up there. 😠

[–] JAWNEHBOY@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

Same

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

So, what if Biden used broad immunity SCOTUS granted to declare a crisis of democracy

You're proposing that Biden do the very thing you claim to loathe. You're proposing he engage in the behavior you suspect trump may engage in. Do you realize how unhinged your statements are? Invalidating an election would be the end of American democracy. Forcing people to vote who chose to abstain would be the end of American liberty. You want to do something because you're afraid it might be done. This was the election. These are the choices people made. Proposing radical responses because you didn't like the outcome puts you in the same category as the January 6th insurrectionists from 2020.

[–] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I agree with most of your points, but mandatory voting is not anti-freedom in my book. Plenty of places have it (Australia for example) and people can always choose to invalidate their ballot if they don't want to make a choice.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except the difference is that the january 6th insurrectionists were too dumb to see what trump is. This time around, its the non-insurrectionsists who are too dumb.

On a more serious, but equally true, note: youre literally just rehashing the paradox of tolerism which has already been solved. If party A is going to do something, then party B should be able to do that too. Republicans are going to abuse power regaurdless of whether democrats do. At best, to argue that democrats should control themselves to not tempt republicans is victim blaming and makes you a republican apologist, at worst you are sealioning and are actually just a republican.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Second highest voter turn out in US history.

Please Please Please stop this.

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] cmeu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The presumption here is that all the non voters would've voted against Trump - but even among motivated voters, that wasn't true. So who's to say more voters would've materially altered the outcome? What makes it likely there's a different outcome with more voices..? As I remember, it seemed like Kamala was behind all along

Also, the electoral outcomes don't change much if the yellow state was already aligned to your preference 🤷‍♂️ my vote wouldn't change the outcome of my state, years of voting on principle for independent and non incumbents have proven that to me, so why bother voting for the pres?

Especially when it is literally giant douche v turd sandwich - neither option represents a win.

[–] yetiftw@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

that's not the point being made

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What, and please tell us the point that is being made?

Is it that the election was not valid? Is it that the Democrats are somehow not the loser? Is it that the majority of Americans showed up to vote?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Masamune@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How many of the non-voters would vote if online voting was an option? I am sure there are many technical hurdles for online voting, but surely it would increase turnout and is not too far out of the realm of possibility?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It's a terrible idea the more you look into it. Seems great at first for sure, but you do not want it. Too easy to mess with it.

[–] JAWNEHBOY@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Paper creates a better physical trail to avoid tampering. The time commitment should be reduced by allowing voting by mail, even better if it's mandatory. Easily enforced with a tax break for participating and just sending back a receipt of vote recorded accurately.

[–] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Its pretty difficult to do... Cleo Abrams has an amazing video about this exact thing. If you want the shorter version of the video, here you go.

[–] TheTrueColonel@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

Online voting for the US election allows for much much easier tampering from foreign and domestic powers. It's a method with way to many severe issues to use on a massive scale, as convenient as it would be.

load more comments