PhilipTheBucket

joined 2 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you! It is monthly active user count (MAU) divided by number of subscribers. That gives a good metric for active communities, with a preference for newish communities with a lot of organic activity.

A few times a day, it takes the highest community by that metric, that has at least 50 subscribers and hasn't already been posted, and posts it.

 

It's another bot that watches for communities that you might want to subscribe to, and posts them so you can subscribe if you want their content.

Enjoy.

!communities@ponder.cat

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 11 hours ago

Am I right in assuming that - API wise - the bot only interacts with ponder.cat, and doesn’t make calls to the remote instance? (I’m wondering if there’s any barriers to it operating with communities that aren’t on a Lemmy instance).

Yes, that's right. It should work fine on a non-Lemmy instance.

Does the bot resolve the human first, check what they moderate, and then resolve the community if they moderate it, or just always resolve the community, and then compare its moderators with who made the request? If its the latter, this could be a way for bad actors to crowbar a community onto your instance (assuming it doesn’t purge it if things don’t match up, of course).

It's the latter. I think it's okay. The same thing can happen on any instance where someone can search for a community from any other instance.

What would have happened if Otter had sent /add https://lemmy.ca/feeds/c/medicine.xml medicine@lemmy.ca ? Would this be like that time when someone put ‘google’ into google.com, and the Internet blew up?

It's limited to one posting every 5 minutes per feed, so the damage would be limited, but you're right that it would enter an infinite loop and post once every five minutes until someone put a stop to it.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Really great tool, thanks!

Thank you!

In the commands, will {instance} always be rss.ponder.cat?

create account on rss.ponder cat

Or do you make the communities and then we add feeds to them?

No to all. This particular tool is only for communities on other instances. It doesn't interact with the big feeds on rss.ponder.cat.

rss.ponder.cat is for the all-RSS-post communities that I've been making. A lot of them will be pretty heavy on their posting, so some people may prefer to block the whole thing wholesale. I can add communities if people request it, but it's something I want to be a little bit careful with, so as not to create too much spam.

This new tool is designed to add RSS feeds to communities outside of ponder.cat. Something like releases of a FOSS project, weather updates for a city, things like that. The moderators of those communities can use the bot to do whatever they want within their communities, without having to involve me.

Does each message need to have only one command?

No, you can issue multiple commands. It should work fine. Of course if it gives you any issues, you can let me know.

Edit: Otter already answered, I just didn't see it. I'm leaving it for posterity, though.

 

Hello everyone!

If you moderate a community, and you want to get automatic posts from an RSS feed, now you can. It can be used for release posts for a FOSS project, infrequent blog postings that are relevant to your community, or things like that.

To do this, send a private message to bot@rss.ponder.cat. The commands are:

  • /add {rss_url} {community}@{instance} - Add a new RSS feed
  • /delete {rss_url} {community}@{instance} - Unlink an existing RSS feed from the community
  • /list {community}@{instance} - List all feeds for a community
  • /help - Show this help message

Please don't spam. You need to be a moderator of the community to modify its feed settings, but it's still possible for moderators to spam the rest of their instance with nonsense. Be a good Lemmy. If you'd like an RSS feed that's going to post a lot, and you want to separate it into a place where it won't invade the rest of Lemmy in a flood, send me a message and we can work it out.

Enjoy! Have fun.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 27 points 3 days ago

I am fetching the RSS feeds for particular channels, for which I need the channel ID.

Google gives out not only the RSS feed, but also the channel ID, if you click the menu under “share”, as someone else pointed out to me a couple days ago. You are very confused about things. This thing about it being against the TOS is pure fantasy.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 96 points 3 days ago

The network said this week it would encourage the candidates to fact-check each other, but it never ruled out the notion that moderators would fact-check the candidates.

It’s a pleasure to see the only party that everyone respects worldwide, the master negotiators who fixed the Iran nuclear deal, in action.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am not on reddit. Are you?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am not an enthusiast. I just know some people who are.

I think you pretty much hit the nail on the head. EUCs are faster and more powerful, to the point that you'll need a lot of safety gear or else you might get really badly hurt. People get passionate about them and carry them everywhere and get carried away with tinkering with them, and it becomes part of their personality. But they are useful to the point of becoming a part of your transportation method. You have to carry it with you, which is less convenient than nothing but more convenient than having to find a place to put a whole car or bicycle.

The two are similar in the sense of being one-wheel vehicles you stand on, but their niches are different enough that it makes sense to me that the groups are pretty disjoint. I don't know of any "group" for one-wheels analogous to the one for EUCs.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's a different type of vehicle. I don't really know why, but the EUC style of wheels lets you go basically as fast as safety concerns will allow. The good ones can go up to 40-50 mph mechanically. You're never going to do that unless you have a death wish, but the point is that if you don't need to get on the interstate or carry large things with you, it's a good distance to being a full replacement for a car, with a lot of advantages over a car.

It's not just one company that makes them. The Veteran models are supposed to be good. I know there are some providers that make ones that are awful and unsafe. It's a little bit of a wild west, but there's also a whole community of people who 3d print parts for them, make modifications, that kind of thing. It's a very dweeby community in general, so maybe that is a deal-breaker. But the reason I say they are the future is that they are fast enough to be largely a replacement for a car, and smaller and handier than a bike or scooter.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

*fifth, with SO's default sorting, after several screens full of wrong answers

It's a wonderful answer and I appreciate knowing about it now, because that process definitely wasn't the first idea that came to my mind. If only Google and SO had given that answer to me before I did the whole adventure I pasted into my post and comment.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's search. I'm copy-pasting the content going down from the top of the page, adding my own commentary.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 17 points 4 days ago

The mystery is solved. People are trying to provide good answers to strangers for free because they are good and helpful. Google's senseless reorganization of things is causing them not to function anymore. And then, Stack Overflow's bad configuration is defeating those good people's efforts to provide them to me.

I think we've learned that SO has succumbed to the same organizational syphilis that Google contracted a few years earlier.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I'll click on the link you sent me, and start reading carefully, trying to find the answer. Here's how it went. I am not faking or deliberately trying any wrong things here. I'm just grabbing the most central solution it's presenting me on any given page, and trying it.

Here's the progress:

or those who come across this after the latest Data API revision (31st January, 2024), they provided the forHandle query parameter to get data of a handle/username. You can refer to this answer for details here: stackoverflow.com/a/78074066/2665606 – Saqib Ahmed Commented Feb 29 at 10:01

Cool. I click on that question.

YouTube released a revision on 31st January 2024 to add a forHandle parameter in the channel list API that does exactly what OP asks.

You can call the channel list API with forHandle to get the channel ID and the upload playlist for that user/handle that you can subsequently use to fetch the videos.

GET https://www.googleapis.com/youtube/v3/channels

Query parameters:

forHandle=FolkartTr OR @FolkartTr OR %40FolkartTr (this allows the '@' sign as well as URL encoding of it) key= part=contentDetails

Cool.

$ wget -O - https://www.googleapis.com/youtube/v3/channels\?forHandle=Lindybeige
--2024-10-01 01:19:52--  https://www.googleapis.com/youtube/v3/channels?forHandle=Lindybeige
Resolving www.googleapis.com (www.googleapis.com)... 2a00:1450:4009:822::200a, 2a00:1450:4009:826::200a, 2a00:1450:4009:823::200a, ...
Connecting to www.googleapis.com (www.googleapis.com)|2a00:1450:4009:822::200a|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden
2024-10-01 01:19:52 ERROR 403: Forbidden.

Oh. I need an API key. Okay, that one's useless.

I read another answer.

If I understood correctly, your problem is that you can't do anything from such a c/ channel id with the Channels: list of the YouTube Data API v3. If you're just looking for the channel id linked to this id then because as YouTube Data API v3 doesn't work for this, I would recommend you to use my open-source YouTube operational API, indeed by requesting https://yt.lemnoslife.com/channels?cId=FolkartTr you'll receive a JSON with id equals to the channel id linked to the provided cId value.

That means nothing to me.

I hit back. We're back at the original page you linked me to:

To obtain the channel id you can view the source code of the channel page and find either data-channel-external-id="UCjXfkj5iapKHJrhYfAF9ZGg" or "externalId":"UCjXfkj5iapKHJrhYfAF9ZGg".

UCjXfkj5iapKHJrhYfAF9ZGg will be the channel ID you are looking for.

Already covered. It doesn't work.

An easy answer is, your YouTube Channel ID is UC + {YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID}. To be sure of your YouTube Channel ID or your YouTube account ID, access the advanced settings at your settings page

And if you want to know the YouTube Channel ID for any channel, you could use the solution @mjlescano gave.

https://www.googleapis.com/youtube/v3/channels?key={YOUR_API_KEY}&forUsername={USER_NAME}&part=id If this could be of any help, some user marked it was solved in another topic right here.

Are you getting sick of reading these? So am I! I want to remind that DDG gave me the answer at the top of the page, as a tool that would solve the problem for me.

At any channel page with "user" url for example http://www.youtube.com/user/klauskkpm, without API call, from YouTube UI, click a video of the channel (in its "VIDEOS" tab) and click the channel name on the video. Then you can get to the page with its "channel" url for example https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfjTOrCPnAblTngWAzpnlMA.

Edit:

Above is not working any more. But we can open Developer Tools (cmd + option + I) and try to find the URL there. Search by channel_id for some channels, it will show you, but NOT for all the channels.

By the way, if this is your own channel -- you can go here https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3/docs/channels/list and make request with part snippet and mine true.

Oh, I found this answer. Thank you, just works!

Edit:

Just in case you need UC channel id of any channel by the "YouTube handle", you can also use 'API Explorer' on the right of this page https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3/docs/channels/list and enter forHandle with your 'API key' (let me share screenshots below)

Sure, let's try the Cmd+Option+I solution.

Hey! Look at that. www.youtube.com wants to use my microphone. I can:

  • Allow while visiting this site
  • Allow this time
  • Never allow

I think we're done here. For all I know I would have been able to find it in the network tab of developer tools while searching for the channel, but I think the point is made. I didn't say that the answer didn't exist anywhere on SO, I said that the things I was trying because either Google or SO were telling me they were the answer were not working.

Edit: I reread your comment and got confused. For me, the screenshot you're showing has 26 points, and shows up below all of the answers that I showed above, which have 259, 79, 32, and 30 points respectively. How many points does it have on your page, to show as the second highest answer? I didn't deliberately stop reading right before the answer. I absolutely made a sincere effort to find the answer on that page, documenting my progress as I went.

 

For some reason I was back in Chrome today, and I searched Google, without meaning to, for:

get channel id for a youtube channel

Here's what I got:


✨ AI Overview Learn more … To find a YouTube channel's ID, you can: Use the YouTube account settings Sign in to YouTube, select your profile picture, then Settings, and then Advanced settings. You must be signed in as the channel's primary owner to see this information.

That's great, but I am not the channel's primary owner, and surely the majority of the time the person seeking an answer to this question will not be, also.

Use the channel's URL Click on the channel's name under any of its videos, and then look at the URL of that page. The handle will appear at the end of the link, preceded by the @ sign.

?

That is not the channel ID.

Use the page source code View the page source code of any video from the channel, and look for the "channelid" keyword.

I felt a little stingy at this point, because this sounds like a real solution.

I opened the source for the channel page, and searched the source code for channelid, and found nothing.

Then, while typing this complaint, I noticed that I was supposed to do that from a random video's page, so I opened one of the videos, did that, and found nothing.

A YouTube channel can have multiple URLs that direct viewers to the channel homepage. These URLs can look different, but they all point to the same channel.

Irrelevant information. How do I find the channel ID?

Generative AI is experimental. 👍 👎

Thanks Google! I know.

Sign in to YouTube. Settings . From the left menu, select Advanced settings. You'll see your channel's user and channel IDs.

Find your YouTube user & channel IDs - Google Help

Yes! I know. However, this isn't my channel. I want to find someone else's channel's ID.

❓About featured snippets • 💬 Feedback

I have some doubts whether you would accept my feedback, if I decided to give it. Why is this here?

Learn what words mean as you search Select words to get definitions & translations without leaving the page (Got it)

Thanks! That's really useful to know. Do you know how I can get a channel ID though?

People also ask

  • How do I get a YouTube Content ID?
  • Does YouTube have the ID channel?
  • How do I get my YouTube channel name?
  • How to find YouTube channel gmail id?

Fascinating!

Stack Overflow https://stackoverflow.com › questions › how-can-i-get-a... An easy answer is, your YouTube Channel ID is UC + {YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID}. To be sure of your YouTube Channel ID or your YouTube account ID, access the advanced ... 23 answers Top answer: To obtain the channel id you can view the source code of the channel page and find ... How can I get YouTube channel ID using channel name URL? Feb 7, 2023 Is there any way to get youtube channel ID ... - Stack Overflow Sep 14, 2023 How to get a youtube channelid from the channels link ... Jan 11, 2023 I can't get channel id using YouTube Data API v3 Mar 25, 2023 More results from stackoverflow.com

I clicked on Stack Overflow, closed several popups. The top answer wasn't useful. I did find a couple of answers down:

"To obtain the channel id you can view the source code of the channel page and find either data-channel-external-id="UCjXfkj5iapKHJrhYfAF9ZGg" or "externalId":"UCjXfkj5iapKHJrhYfAF9ZGg".

UCjXfkj5iapKHJrhYfAF9ZGg will be the channel ID you are looking for.

I tried that, and it didn't work.

Back to Google:

Comment Picker https://commentpicker.com › Tools › YouTube YouTube Channel ID Finder is a free tool to help you find a YouTube channel ID, along with other related channel information and statistics.

And it worked! I get 2 free channel ID queries per day. Fortunately I only needed the one. But it worked! It only took several minutes of scrolling past multiple screens of things that didn't work.


Now let's compare that to DDG.

Videos for get channel id for a youtube channel 1:28 How to Find YouTube Channel ID - 2024 263K views YouTube1yr

I skipped this as I didn't want a video.

https://www.streamweasels.com › tools › youtube-channel-id-and-user-id-convertor YouTube Channel ID Finder - YouTube Username to ID Convertor Simply enter any YouTube username or handle below and click Convert Username to ID. This tools makes use of the YouTube API to make the conversion. You can check out our other API tools here. Select YouTube handle, username or legacy: YouTube handles are now considered the default for Y

And there we go! It works.


When did it get this bad?

 

I've heard that the standard Lemmy UI is not under active development because the Lemmy UI developers are working on a rewrite. I looked at it for a while though, and I thought that, aside from some missing features and polish, it was fine.

I'm trying Photon right now, and it is also fine, and a little more feature-complete, but it is visibly janky in some respects. Maybe it is my biases, but I also much prefer the model of clicking on things and getting a new page over a single-page app that you interact with via controls.

What was so terrible about the vanilla Lemmy UI? Do people really have a strong level of dislike for it? It seems to me like it just needs some love to smooth down the rough edges and awkward spots, but the core doesn't seem in any way terrible such that it would need to be abandoned.

view more: next ›