this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
-84 points (7.1% liked)

Conservative

394 readers
68 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably good that nobody asks you

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Heinous to use someone’s tragic image and story beside your headline.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Also, "just" 3 deaths we know of. If you have read literally anything about abortions pre-Roe, I guarantee you that you're potentially missing at least one and maybe 2 zeros behind that. This also doesn't account for women who have been irreversibly harmed from attempting to access or perform off-the-books abortion care, or those who have to carry to term a child when pregnancy might harm them.

Also, "only" 3 deaths is still a tragedy. Those people had families. They had friends, coworkers, and lives. At least one of them was literally still a child. Trying to play a numbers game between people dead because of a law and the number of "babies saved" is ghoulish behavior.

[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Truly disgusting that you think any women dying is acceptable, let alone a "damn good trade".

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't wait for a portion of these 50k babies to be blamed for increase in crime, drug use and poverty.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And all of those babies are in loving caring homes that can afford to take care of them? None of the families were forced to keep them?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›