this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
530 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59742 readers
2229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

"Journalists flock to yet another proprietary, commercial platform as the last becomes increasingly 'toxic' for reasons unknown."

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

No elon... literally all that matters

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

Oh shut up with that.

You act like there's some kind of alternative which there isn't. Mastodon, which I'm sure you were going to mention, absolutely does not count because it's a nightmare to use and they haven't bothered to fix any of its problems.

So there is no viable alternative.

Also because it's so awful to use, no one does use it, and so no one's on the platform. After all, journalists need to go where the viewers are.

There is zero point being smug about your open source platform, if no one uses your open source platform.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 7 points 8 hours ago

News outlets should be spinning up their own federated social media instances, so that THEY control their own platform, akin to a website, or email addresses.

That solves all of their issues with it.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -2 points 5 hours ago

All of these journalists have a website they can post on already. Their companies site.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Okay then, hope people won't complain when things go to shit again

Just forever on march towards the inevitable due to convenience

[–] B312@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You do realise people would’ve switched to mastodon if it weren’t so inconvenient? People don’t care about the long term projections of Bluesky. They want Muskless Twitter and they got Muskless Twitter. Simple as that

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm just really tired of telling people about the obvious, and every time history keeps repeating

I don't believe it's just convenience, it's as you said, people don't care about the long term. In anything.

A big corporate platform (or whatever else, like, say, oil companies vs climate protesters) will always have more resources, whether it's for development or marketing, so people will always have to be a bit willing to not have full convenience for a better world

If we don't think about the long term, what are we even thinking of instead?

Social media rises and falls just like any other fad or fashion. It's a never-ending churn, as people (particularly, young people) inevitably crave something novel. There's little use in fighting the cycle, just as there'd be little use in fighting the trendy choices of a teenager.

It's frustrating to watch people en masse continue to make choices that don't make sense. It turns out that a lot of people are much more driven to follow the crowd than to have (let alone stand by) personal principles or rational decisions. Thankfully, we're not obligated to be like that. There's always some sort of counter-culture that bucks the main trends, and honestly? That's where the most interesting people tend to be.

If you feel driven to educate people on the futility of trends, then by all means, go for it. I just know it can be draining, and not everyone is going to be receptive. On the plus side, you sound like a rational person who actually thinks about their decisions - in a world full of followers, that can be pretty powerful.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago

Ten years later

"Journalists flock from Bluesky...

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, what’s the alternative? Mastodon culturally could not get its shit together enough to be a viable alternative.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago

Shit, they can do a lemmy or kbin instance, it would fit their format anyways. Post link from their domain, and it gets shared across the network.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Flock to wherever the critical mass of the herd is moving, in this case the very guy that caused their troubles in the first place.

Those are the very people supposed that are supposed to inform us and warn us of upcoming threat as well as mobilize the general population to defend against them.

But again they lead the population to the slaugtherhouse.

The death of journalism in the beginning of the 00s is certainly the first thread unravelling our civilizations in favour of the hype con-mens and their billionaires backers and other monarchs trying to swallow humanity whole.

All this effort, yet we don't even resist...

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 6 points 18 hours ago (8 children)
[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 hours ago

Wait what happened here? Did the GPT understand what the hooman did not? R O F L

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›