I used to say "if you're gonna remake a movie, you should remake a bad movie but do it better."
Then they remade The Crow. "Dude I said do it better. π€¦ββοΈ"
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
I used to say "if you're gonna remake a movie, you should remake a bad movie but do it better."
Then they remade The Crow. "Dude I said do it better. π€¦ββοΈ"
You said "remake a bad movie."
Every iteration of me from 1994 to now is coming to your home to kick your ass right up and out past your teeth for calling the OG Crow a bad movie.
Yes, most of us will be in face paint. Some of us may have black trench coats on. There may even be some hammer pants, but we won't talk about that.
Remakes that are better than the original:
The Thing
The Fly
The Blob
Invasion of the Body Snatchers
Cat People
Hmm. I'm noticing a trend here.
The Wild Robot in theaters. Not a sequel or a remake. It is based off of a novel though.
2024 was apparently the first year where all the top-10 highest grossing movies were sequels. List doesn't include Moana 2 and Gladiator 2 which are expected to make a lot of money as well.
Wild Robot really surprised me.. Score was fantastic and some scenes had me bawling
We took our toddler to see it and both my partner and I had multiple episodes of weeping. Lovely film.
Also, for those interested in more mature movies: Juror #2. I had good expectations and was not disappointed. At least, not by the movie. There were only a handful of people in an already small cinema room, only a week after release. Meanwhile, Gladiator II is drawing a lot of public.
While I love shitting on CEOs and business people as much as the next left-oriented person, this trend in the movie industry is very much, at least partially, at fault due to many of the consumers.
Y2K. It was better than I expected!
Also, I remember walking out of Everything Everywhere All At Once and being angry because it probably wouldnβt do well in theaters or win any awards, despite being one of the best original movies I had ever seen.
I was happy to be wrong on that one.
Another also, I absolute hate that the video game industry is jumping on this trend. Sometimes itβs nice to play games I missed out on as a kid but itβs getting so bad now, they remaster games from a couple years ago. Enough is enough.
Last solid remaster is probably Age of Mythologies Retold.
Most remasters by now are just junkware though.
I'm not against sequels/prequels, just need some more than "it's the sequel to that one you liked".
OK, but why does it need a sequel? Can you make me interested in it aside from the fact it's a sequel? Is it any good....?
Not a movie or fully original, but I watched Arcane and I loved it. It was good without knowing about the game, and those who know the game say it's better if you do. That's what a sequel/remake/adaptation should strive for.
People want original without taking the risk of watching an unknown movie that might be bad
I just canβt afford $30 for a ticket
The Banshees of Inisherin
i watched it in a theater, because i've heard the movie was good. Didn't read up much on it beforehand and enjoyed watching it, albeit not fully getting it i guess.
It felt worth going to a theater for. Contrary to the last 3 or so Marvel movies i've seen in theater because friends dragged me and i ended up falling asleep every time.
Movies and shows that I have watched this year in no particular order and not all released this year:
The Beekeeper
Iron Claw
Say Nothing
Altered States
The Substance
Oppenheimer
Peaky Blinders (rewatch)
Kneecap
In The Name of the Father
The Batman
Lord of the Rings (rewatch)
The Departed (rewatch)
Deep Space Nine (haven't finished)
The Devil's Own
Sicario
Additionally, my wife has recently started watching Gossip Girl but I only catch glimpses of that show. Did anybody actually like that show when it came out?
The reason I believe sequels are doing good is:
There used to be dozens of theaters in a city, each one with a different set of contracts playing a different set of movies. Nowadays there are hundreds of movies in a city, all of them with the same set of contracts playing the same 5 movies.
Yes, everything is too expensive, what means nobody can afford to take a risk. Not the public, not the theaters, not the studios. (You can see people on this thread commenting that they won't.)
There are what? 3 movie studios nowadays? Or are those 2? Either way, you can't expect diversity from that.
~~Millions~~ Hundreds of beavers.
On a projector at home.
A silent film. From 2022.
Bizarre. Stupid. Funny. Silly. Stupid. Cute. Bizarre. And stupid.
β β β β
I stopped watching almost all franchise and remakes. Horror seems be the only genre worth watching. I had the highest hopes for the creator so much wasted potential.
Horror has been exceedingly formulaic for long while, which cabin in the woods masterfully satirized by flopping, but there have been many innovations recently. Love that practical effects have made a comeback.
Yeah I really liked the substance. There were a few issues but enjoyed the overall message they were trying to tell. Most A24 movies have been solid.
Poor marketing and limited theater releases is why and studios can blame themselves.
The huge improvements in TV screens have a lot to do with it too, I think.
When we only had CRT screens at home it was a big jump in quality to go to the theater. But when you have a 4K screen in your living room, there's less reason to go to the theater.
Bullshit. The box office speaks for itself. Maybe YOU want to see new movies. Regular people want the newest superhero shit movie and remakes
Check the meme again
Just get Nick Cage to be in your movie, that seems to be the secret ingredient
How original we talking?
I have seen The Substance (good) in theaters and I saw the TV glow (hated it). I also watched Megalopolis (weird) in theaters and if we want something really original I even last year watched the Onyx the Fortuitous movie in theaters (enjoyed the heck out of it)
I will likely watch Nosferatu in theaters and any smaller movie that puts the effort in and deserves my money.
But I am not paying for the movies that they make just to make money. I don't reward that kind of bad behavior and that afront to art and story telling.
The price of movies is too damn high to go out and watch them. My system at home is far more comfortable and costs barely anything.
What makes money is recognition.
Sequels are one way to do that. Another is a big name actor. Another is a big name director. What was the last thing you watched that fulfilled none of those?
Mine is probably Oddity, and I watched it on Jellyfin. It's honestly tricky to find things like that that aren't Β£2 DVD bargain bin trash from the depths of Netflix.
There was a theory somewhere that this is about power play. If you produce Spiderman 245, power shifts away from the director and towards the production company. Less artistic freedom, more money management. If you let the director create their own movie, they are mostly in charge of how things go, movies become more artistic and less focused on money (alone).
I have nothing to confirm this and don't remember the source I have that from except "the internet"
Does Barbenheimer count?
Hundreds of Beavers.
And I watched it by just sort of holding my eyes open while the video file played on my computer screen.
People want to watch good movies. With remakes people want to see the original but with different actors and usually studios fuck them up by trying to fix what wasnβt broke.
The last one I saw, by release date, was Late Night with the Devil, and I pirated it. I'm glad I pirated it, because I didn't know it had AI slop in it. If I did, I wouldn't have watched it. It's a shame, too, cause otherwise, it wasn't bad.
Edge of Tomorrow. It was fun. Drag didn't give any money to Tom Cruise, though.
In theaters: Heretic, and before that The Substance
Recently at home:
Saturday Night
Man on the Moon
I saw the TV Glow
Edit: for line breaks
Wild Robot - Piracy
Hundreds of Beavers - Piracy
Chocolate - Tubi
Donβt remember the last sequel I watched but movies are too long to watch in one sitting
Sure, it's the customers who decide the market. That's how it works.
I watched A League of Their Own last week. Very watchable, not at all flashy, and refreshingly earnest. I hate that so many modern movies are so wised up and meta, and I find myself watching older movies more and more.
Recently it's been Ghost, Bull Durham, Forrest Gump, and Field of Dreams. (I don't even like baseball, no idea why so many of these are baseball movies!)
Wild robot at home, My last theater movie? Spider-Man into the Spider-Verse.
The theaters used to pack everybody in for every show. And they just crank the prices up and up. I'm sure that they think home streaming and piracy is what killed them. But you can buy a TV the price of taking a family afford to the movies.
Beau is afraid. I found a stream of it online (yar matey). It was strange but good.
I have a bad movie night with family every week, and these were the recent ones. We watched via streaming services.
The last Marvel movie I watched was the end game one. Haven't bothered with another Marvel TV series or movie since. The last star wars movie I watched was the one where Luke projects his appearance and the bad guys shoot it a lot without doing anything. I haven't bothered with any of the other tv series or movies for star wars either.
I'm not the usual customer though. The last movies I saw in theaters was wicked and inside out 2.
The last Marvel movie I watched was the end game one. Havenβt bothered with another Marvel TV series or movie since.
With some exceptions, this was a good choice