this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
-3 points (36.4% liked)

Futurology

1886 readers
50 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
voidx@futurology.today
Lugh@futurology.today
Espiritdescali@futurology.today
AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today
-3
Generative AI can’t shake its reliability problem. Some say ‘neurosymbolic AI’ is the answer. (fortune.com)
submitted 1 month ago by BaylorSwift3@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

We can’t seem to escape from the AI dumpster that we are living in.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

LLMs are fundamentally not designed to be reliable. That is not how they work. That is not the function they optimize. That is not the problem they solve.

You're making a fish climb trees.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah. I've been around long enough to recognize a buzzword driven tech fad when I see one.

[–] zib@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Or, and hear me out, perhaps we could dump this mess and move on to the next tech fad?