726
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 186 points 2 years ago

An entire industry built on taking money they didn't earn to deny the care our doctors prescribe for us... Are we stupid??

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 104 points 2 years ago

I mean, the electorate keeps voting for people who won't pass health care reform so.. Yes?

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 34 points 2 years ago

worse, we vote for healthcare reforms that would take us back to when no one poor got any care at all. we elected our own killers

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Those people are the only options on the ballot though. We can't vote for something that's not an option

[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 years ago

The fuck are you talking about? First of all, primaries exist. Secondly, with only a few notable exceptions, Democrats favor single-payer. The original ACA was a government healthcare bill with a private option but Joe Lieberman was the holdout and gutted it. Stating otherwise is intellectually dishonest and deliberately ignorant, or at worst a malicious rewrite of history.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

In the last primary who was calling for a switch to a single payer healthcare system? None of the candidates were talking about that.

Joe Liberman left office in 2013. That was 11 years ago.

What the fuck are you talking about about?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Not only that , but voting for the people who are promising to make it even worse.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Propaganda told them to.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 26 points 2 years ago

Are we stupid??

Yup.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

It's not stupidity, because over 99% of us didn't have a choice. It's greed. Greedy little piggy leaders of major systems designed to fuck over everyone but them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 139 points 2 years ago

Good. Burn it all down and replace it with universal healthcare.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 28 points 2 years ago

Like every other modern country! They all get better care for less money!!!

[-] spireghost@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 years ago

No, you see, America is bigger so it won't work for some reason

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just ignore economies of scales you little working class peasants. That doesn't work here.

[-] A7thStone@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It's because they have more people per capita, duh.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Awfully optimistic of you to expect that it'll be replaced by anything better.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If I don't have even a shred of optimism my mental health would be x10 worse. I need it, swiper no swiping. 🙃

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 68 points 2 years ago

Burn the industry to the ground.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago

Is it 0? No?

Have a ways to go then.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Same goes for number of biz execs/CEOs.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 36 points 2 years ago

What shit timing for this... Imagine if this happened like a year ago. Maybe Democrats could have actually had a reason to be pushed to talk about this... Seeing how even Magoos were happy the guy got killed maybe things could have been different.

We live in the stupid timeline though so somehow this will just get worse :/

[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 45 points 2 years ago

1/3+ of the party wanted Bernie. Twice. And they couldn't be arsed to talk about it, his primary policy position. They're still not taking about it. Too much donor money involved for them to give a shit what their voters say.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Had a reason? They already had a reason. They had thousands of reasons. Thousands of Americans dying due to the shit industry. Is that not a reason enough for Democrats?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They always had the excuse of "people love their healthcare!" That's the line that was always trotted out. It would be pretty difficult to keep that line when we're literally executing healthcare CEOs and having a positive nationwide reaction to it.

If journalists would actually do their proper duty for the population and not their masters (lmao) they'd start pushing representatives on the topic as it relates to the response.

(Instead though we get articles like "Bad luck Brian was the working class hero, not Luigi" from the NYT. 🤮)

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Bernie's Medicare For All plan has been out there close to a decade now and I would argue that proposal is a huge part of his popularity. Democrats knew that and they told him, and by extension his supporters, to go fuck themselves. They know people want this but they don't care.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 years ago

Good. Shareholding and profiteering off healthcare should not be a thing. It should be a government service not a business, although I'd bet a million dollars I don't have, that it won't happen under Trump. And if it ever does happen, they had better fucking plan it to be rock-solid against ruthless cutthroat cheating grifters like him.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Health food shelter clothing.

All of these things should be provided to everyone in every country, paid for by taxes.

Just eliminate the struggle of the common person from these 4 things is a goal worth being a prime prime directive

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 31 points 2 years ago

Portip: short stock. Pump bullets into CEOs. Profit from dump.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

That's an actual series of missions in GTAV

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

magdump/stockdump

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 years ago

I'm not entirely sure why the stocks are falling. Does anybody think they're going to tidy up their profit margins? They're going to walk around in armored limousines with security details. And the new administration is going to make absolutely certain they can still bulldoze their way through.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

One of them already walked back a "we will limit the amount of anaethestic you're allowed in surgical procedures" they'd announced.

The market sees that the CEOs fear for their lives and want to make it sound like they care rather than deny care, so profits will fall, because paying for healthcare is a lot more expensive than paying a call centre worker to say no.

Hence the industry as a whole is less profitable, because, you know, what with death being so unpopular suddenly these days amongst healthcare CEOs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 years ago

For once, we have a good news.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

JackNicholsonYesYESS.gif

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 2 years ago

Sounds like tHe mARkEt thinks something will gut the industry. But there is no indication of actual real change happening. So what's going on?

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

The rich are experiencing fear and reacting emotionally.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 2 years ago

Most of these ghouls only care about money, so maybe this will help

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
726 points (99.2% liked)

News

39306 readers
1957 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS