this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
675 points (95.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

6014 readers
2688 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OR3X@lemm.ee 3 points 38 minutes ago

Isn't that the whole fucking point of the show though? The main characters are terrible selfish assholes?

[–] MrGerrit@feddit.nl 1 points 22 minutes ago
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It’s not offensive, it’s just not that funny.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

That's what's offensive

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

97% of Seinfeld's entertainment value is the bass line.

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 31 minutes ago

BA DOUH BUH shikka shikka BAH-DA (et al)

But if you make an observation and draw it out for a long time, that automatically makes it funny, right?

[–] BedInspector@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Not saying it's not funny, but there is definitely stuff in the show that wouldn't fly today. For example there is an episode where George didn't know black people ate salad.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 24 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I don't like Seinfeld, but isn't George supposed to be an utter dunce?

Like, as a Zoomer, people not being able to tell the difference between portraying bigotry and endorsing it IS an actual problem I see.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I am reminded of Sokka's character in the new version of the Avatar (show) compared to the original animated one. In the original animated one, he portrays sexism and very much feels the consequences of it, and grows as a character when overcoming it (through warranted humiliation). The new show never included any of this and so his character lacks all of this. It's like the writers think they're endorsing his sexism if they ever included such a thing.

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 42 minutes ago

I don't think they are afraid of it, I think they just wanted to portray a more serious character overall. Live action lens itself to that serious tone, where It would be hard to replicate some of the slapstick gags in the anime and trying would fall flat.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

He is also based on Larry David himself, and many of the most outrageous stunts he does in Seinfeld, David has done in real life. For example, George quitting his job just to regret it immediately and going back the next day as if nothing had happened, is based on Larry David doing exactly that as a writer on SNL. He made a big scene and quit, and just went back after the weekend and pretended like he'd been joking. Larry David is an interesting man to say the least.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 5 points 3 hours ago

He made a big scene and quit, and just went back after the weekend and pretended like he’d been joking.

Sounds like the whole situation could've been avoided by him curbing his enthusiasm

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 6 points 16 hours ago

and a lot of questionable consent sex situations if I remember correctly

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I heard on a podcast today that Larry David based the George character on himself. (The podcast is called Good Bad Billionaire, where a couple of people judge various billionaires on their ethics etc. TIL Jerry Seinfeld is a billionaire.)

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 4 hours ago

Not a Seinfeld fan but I did see enough episodes of both it and Curb Your Enthusiasm to be annoyed that I didn't make this connection.

[–] wolfeh@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

This whole "young people find everything offensive" narrative is ridiculous, and always has been. It's very beneficial to those who want to shift the Overton window, though.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I did a re-watch in the last couple years. Most of it was fine, even if it would not be a big hit these days. Jerry dates the Asian women? Yea that would get called out most likely. Elaine dates a guy she thinks is black? Pretty sure that still flies. Elaine is scarred she's dating a murderer? Probs a special two part episode these days. Shocks me how ahead of the curve they were with the Elaine gets gaped episode.

[–] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

I guess I'm going to have to rewatch now.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

That right there is some clickbait. I'm millennial and I was watching the show when it was on and loved it.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, not sure how old they think millennials are or when they thought Seinfeld aired

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

#HEY IT'S THE ASSMAN!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 13 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

If they(we) think Seinfeld is offensive, what do they think of IASIP?

[–] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 7 points 4 hours ago

Well, IASIP is also actually funny, which helps.

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Meh, Jerry Seinfeld has been pushing the "I'm too offensive for young people" and "I've been cancelled" nonsense for a while now. He's just old and not funny anymore. Turns out telling the same jokes for 30 years doesn't get a lot of laughs. What is the deal with millennials anyway!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he unequivocally walked that back recently. said he was wrong to think that and it isn't a thing. he probably had a talk with his kid or something.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

He probably had a long talk with his PR counselor and was advised that he stood to loose more then he would gain if he stuck to that.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I don't care honestly. the message is more important than the motive.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm an Xer and I didn't like Seinfeld, but that's mostly because I don't like embarrassment comedy. It's the same reason I don't like Will Ferrel and Ben Stiller, but to each their own. I don't begrudge anyone else finding it funny, it's just not my vibe.

[–] blipcast@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I'm not saying you have to like Seinfeld or anything, but I wouldn't consider it embarrassment comedy. It's more about the gang being a bunch of sociopaths, like an early version of IASIP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Millennial here. I tried to watch Seinfeld back in the day, and I thought it was kind of meh. But there was one character I really hated on the show. He had a whiny pathetic voice, was always complaining about something or another, and was just an awful actor, unlike the rest of the cast. I thought, if they just removed that one guy, the show would be great and I'd enjoy it so much more.

I found out later, that guy was Seinfeld. So... I never really got into the show.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

Seinfeld is definitely the weakest character and the show is the most memorable from everyone else

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Millennial here, Seinfeld is the bomb.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are we talking about "Seinfeld", the slightly overrated comedy TV series, or "Seinfeld", the horrible human being?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I didn't realize people didn't like Seinfeld. It's a great show.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The show is OK. Parts of it didn't age that well (i.e. I got older and recognized there's a handful of racist narratives and depictions baked into it). But Jerry Seinfeld himself, holy cow is he a piece of shit in real life.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Racist narratives? Seinfeld has some episodes based on racism. The generally fall into two forms: making fun of racists and having one or more of the cast get accused of racism and hilariously try to prove they’re not.

If anything they’re making fun of the way the label of racist is impossible to get rid of once you’ve been tagged with it. It’s like being committed to a mental hospital and then trying to prove that you’re fine so they should just let you out.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago)

...

Yeah, that and the racist depictions of Babu, the Chinese postman and restaurant staff, the inexplicably Middle Eastern "Soup Nazi"...the fact that the only time black people ever appear on the show is to tokenize them and make an issue out of their identity...same with the association of Hispanic people with criminality (i.e. the two Puerto Rican guys with the armoir)...that is just off the top of my head...

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

I would be meh on it if my older brother didn't watch it every single night, rerun after rerun, when we were growing up. It got really old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com 167 points 1 day ago (31 children)

Didn't millennials watch it growing up? Someone's not getting their generational terms right

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Almost every time an article like this is posted, the contents are the result of one or two comments out of thousands, or a Reddit post that didn't gain much traction outside of "eh, sure, I guess?"

Tangentially related, IMO there should be an "author review" site, where if someone posts a stupid article like this, it is referenced in a database against their name and their frame of reference for the content is called out. Rank "journalists" against this, and eventually the people starting out in the industry posting AI-generated shite that doesn't hold up will start to err on the side of caution.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›