this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
327 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2955 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Progressives criticized House Democrats for choosing Rep. Gerry Connolly over Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for the top Democratic seat on the House Oversight Committee.

The 131-84 vote, reportedly influenced by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, sparked backlash against the party’s “gerontocracy,” with critics like MSNBC’s Joy Reid and others arguing it prioritizes seniority over fresh ideas.

Connolly defended the decision, citing his experience, but progressives argued it reflects the Democratic Party’s resistance to change, hindering its ability to address future challenges and energize younger voters.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Democrats don't deserve anymore support. We've got to get a party for the working class. It's just corporate whores in the GOP and DNC.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 minutes ago

Maybe use those arms for more than just finger-wagging.

[–] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Yeah fuck the Democrats. I'm not giving the DNC or any mainstream PACs any more money. It'll all go through AOC and Bernie from here on out. (Not that my meager contributions mean much to the DNC Corporate whores.)

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

I'll believe they are "up in arms" as soon as they actually do anything.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 23 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The progress wing should leave the party. Force the dems to come crawling or show their hands as sleeper Republicans

[–] alloloto@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The frustration is real. There's a movement to create an American Labor Party. I think if it gets enough steam we might see some real change.

[–] AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'd be hopeful if it wasn't mathematically almost impossible for a third party. But as soon as it happens sign me up regardless.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 63 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The DNC is a right wing corpo puppet masquerading as opposition.

They're far more comfortable with a fascist as President than they would a leftist like AOC.

Stare at what their priorities are a month before Trump takes office, sabotaging their most leftwing members. Commuting the sentences of profiteer judges. Herp derp gotta keep moving right after all! (just an aside, I love the neoliberals defending Biden's corrupt pardons as "just senile/incompetent")

Reminder: the only leftist congresspeople are spoiler candidates. The DNC promotes solely on the basis of how well you prove you can be bought by large money donors, which tells you all you need to know about who's side they're on. The same side as the Fascists on economic policy, as they get the same checks from the same oligarchs.

I've voted blue for 20 years, with my nose held hoping for harm reduction. I phonebanked for Sanders in 2 campaigns. I already know it's all a sham. You can vote whoever you want as long as they're pro corpo capitalism. But in the 2028 primary, when I see the DNC yet again doing everything they can to kneecap a progressive to install a neoliberal, I'm walking away, as it's just another system of control. The illusion of choice.

If the people won't overcome their "free market" propaganda and vote against the shape and priorities of this sociopath owned economy literally legally conning and murdering us for tidy profits, we can't be saved, and there's nothing worth saving left.

[–] VintageTech@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 hours ago

And they wonder why people start hitting people over the head with hammers.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 105 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

It's not just that he's 74...

It's not just that he got diagnosed with terminal throat cancer, and told voters the day after the recent election.

It's that it hasn't been two years since he last violated (the already barely existent) rules against Congress doing a little insider trading.

https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/gerry-connolly-stocks/

Like, did anyone think when Pelosi was weighing in on the oversight committee, that the person she was backing wasnt corrupt and would actually hold anyone from either party accountable?

Pelosi didn't care just because she hates everyone under retirement age. It's because she needed to know the person in charge of the oversight committee had no reason to hold anyone accountable.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 31 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's what I mean, she's corrupt as fuck.

Everyone got hung up on Pelosi just "disliking" AOC, but this would have allowed AOC to investigate Pelosi and other corrupt Dems.

So Pelosi made sure a corrupt Dem got it. That way the status quo is maintained: Dems only go after R, and R only goes after Dems. But neither ever make anything stick.

AOC would try to go after everyone corrupt, and the Republicans would go with it if the target was a Dem.

We'd weed out corruption from the Dem party which would increase turnout, and likely retain the seats.

But it would be bad for Pelosi, and she'll always put herself over party or country

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Just want to point out that most of the top traders are always Republicans but they're never talked about in this context and Pelosi sometimes doesn't even beat the S&P500.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

Second worst is not acceptable.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 4 hours ago

She seems to beat it for the most part. There's a simulator that has a Pelosi ETF trading as "NANC":

https://simulator.tryshare.app/?tickers=NANC

Over the past 5 years, NANC has an annualized return of 15.2%, compared to 8.1% for SPY. I don't know if the simulator takes transaction costs into account or not, but I'd guess she still beats it on average. I would hope she does, given the legalized insider trading involved.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

74? My brother in Quetzalcōātl, she's 84.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] wax@feddit.nu 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Ah, I thought they were referring to Pelosi. My bad.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 34 points 7 hours ago
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 13 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

DNC: "Look what you made me do"

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 26 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

why are the fucking boomers so resistant of letting go of power? pelosi is 84 years old, she belongs in a nursing house, not politics

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

They're like cats with claws stuck in something. They don't even understand that letting go is a thing they could do

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

As with most people in that position, they've been fucking over people for so long that they're terrified of someone turning the tables on them. Hence gathering ungodly amounts of wealth and insulating themselves from the world.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

It's sad but true - and a very old story.

Just like, hey here's 100,000 no strings attached oh can you be at our vote on Thursday? - is a very old story.

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 33 points 8 hours ago

rich old white guy: i have an idea - lets have a rich old white guy do it instead

[all vote yea]

:/

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 42 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

it’s fine I’ve got experience

A fat lot of good your fucking “experience” has done us lately, wouldn’t you say, Connolly, you ossified, cancer-ridden, insider-trading, neoliberal establishment fuck.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I take issue with using cancer-ridden as a derogatory term, but yeah, experience doesn't mean anything if you're working towards the wrong goals

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Think if it as a moral cancer.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 7 hours ago

There is NO TIME to do something about the Democratic party better than NOW.

Nothing much going on, no major elections, let's just get ourselves in shape for 2028. Or 2032 of it takes that long, but DAMNIT, let's get started!

They want a leadership power struggle? They want to play games, like everything's ok, "This is fine?" Let's not. Instead of expressing disgust, wringing our hands, shaking our heads, let's start something new. RIGHT NOW.

Because even a year from now would be too late.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ, these people don't learn.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Exactly. This isn't a mistake or incompetence, it's the point.

It's what they're paid to do. War over social issue symptoms with their "opposition" to present a false choice to the rubes who believe they're "free," while protecting the completely captured economy exactly as it is... From the people suffering it.

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Well... how about a third Party of Sanity?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Sounds good. . . who's running it?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Sorry. No. I did the math on this and I've determined that a vote for Sanity is just a vote for Trump.

You need to end FPTP voting first. So please call the republican congressperson in your gerrymandered district currently authoring the "Ban Liberals From Voting Act of 2025" and let them know you'd like to make it easier for him to lose. If we all work together, we can make it possible for a Libertarian to win a House Seat in 2036.

[–] gift_of_gab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

we can make it possible for a Libertarian to win a House Seat in 2036.

They'd have to stop switching to Republicans first.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago

American Libertarianism is an anti-establishment ideology that's been captured and twisted to support the core principle of the establishment, private property rights. At this point it's nothing more than a sick joke.