this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
1228 points (97.7% liked)

memes

10790 readers
1628 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 122 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Who has the least ethical job at Lockheed?

My money is on the salesman, "this bad boy can kill so many children"

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By shifting what you sell to “this bad boy can disperse your targeted package across an area x by y in z time frame” instead of “we can turn the entire school to rubble” you help them sleep at night.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Consider for instance some comfortable English professor defending Russian totalitarianism. He cannot say outright, ‘I believe in killing off your opponents when you can get good results by doing so’. Probably, therefore, he will say something like this:

‘While freely conceding that the Soviet regime exhibits certain features which the humanitarian may be inclined to deplore, we must, I think, agree that a certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of transitional periods, and that the rigors which the Russian people have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement.’

  • George Orwell
[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Boy Boy has a video where they sneak into a military weapons convention.

One guy was selling crowd control armor and advertised the dissociation from your actions that armor like that creates, divorcing you from guilt.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

CEO because he likely gets paid mostly in shares, and it's really shareholders (not employees) who have the most choice in the matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 97 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Every corp you work at has a dark side. Maybe not Lockheed Martin level of destruction.

  • My current job, we build systems to get people to spend more for things they don't need.

  • My last job, we provided technology to "free speech" folks and looked the other way unless legally obligated to take it down

  • The nonprofit i worked for spent 80% of their time and energy just for funding. Like $2mil a year, and 1.6mil went to paying staff.

Sometimes jobs frame it to look like it's a positive.

  • I worked at one company that "gave opportunities" to offshore engineers because they were a fraction the cost of Americans.

  • Another company outsourced our graphic design to people on Fiverr to help fund "freelancers", and then repurpose the work for million dollar ad campaigns.

And for me, I just constantly think of what the line is and how much of it I can cross to feed my kids.

[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I work in healthcare IT, we develop medical systems which help physicians to help people. It sounds like a good field to work in, but it's still about money in the end, looking for ways to maximise profits, because we live in a capitalist system. As long as profits play the main role, there always is a dark side.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Yup. "Capitalism values only what it can count, and it can only count dollars. Every capitalist wants to invest as little and profit as much as possible."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very rational take. You learn entering the world that every company has a dark side, and every person has a line, but that line shifts.

Personally I'd avoid Lockheed, but when it comes to paying the mortgage, the bank is surprisingly not very amenable to me not having a job. I'd love to avoid working at any bad company, but I'd probably have to sell my house and live out of a studio, and my family would suffer for it.

So I give some graces. For example, people shame folks who work at amazon, but Amazon pays the bills. What I personally have changed to is judging people for being gung ho about a company, happy with what the company is doing, or are they just there as a job. If you're in accounting and you just loooove working for Amazon and think they do no wrong, then yes I judge a lot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Sometimes you find maybe a startup that is for-purpose. So, not necessarily nonprofit, but exists to do something with a predominantly positive impact.

We have so few years here on earth that it feels good to do something that at least is not making any problems worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 86 points 1 week ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 71 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I had a job offer from Cambridge Analytica, they were up front about the work they were doing as well as the pay. Though it was tempting to sell my soul for the pay, even I have my limits.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I had an interview with a “mass email” provider. By the time I left it was clear to both of us that no way in hell.

Is it bad that I consider this much worse than a defense company? Lockheed has some cool tech and help protect my country, at the huge cost of killing so many. Cambridge Analytica indiscriminately attacks people’s privacy, all people, and for profit with no hint at a good purpose

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

I’m sure I still don’t appreciate that historically speaking the world has been quite a dangerous place.

I’m not a fan of dead kids or rich men sending the young to die for them, but I cannot deny my lifestyle significantly benefits from the fact top military spenders align with my ideology. (e.g. I’m better off with a powerful USA than North Korea)

Would be interesting if a new generation of principled Americans were responsible for a change where defense contractors knew to attract modern talent they had to provide assurances against outputs being used for evil. I’m naïve enough to think that might be possible.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Raytheon too. Job offer was $$$weet, but it was related to making missiles even more efficient.

No, I don't think we need to turn brown kids into skeletons yet more efficiently, thanks.

[–] odium@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I got a Raytheon for missile targeting systems. Didn't want it on my conscience and got another offer for slightly less money but way more ethical of a company a week later.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sweet, glad that worked out for you. I've learned for certain types of work I gotta ask whether it's on the attack vs defense side of military work; at least a couple of interviewers have been taken aback by such an apparently blunt question, that it "isn't such a relevant question".

In my mind, both times I was wondering why they thought I'd be happy with coming to work every day if it was for something even possibly negative. Engineers get paid to pay attention to details, the fuck wouldn't I be able to piece this shit together from within?

Compartmentalization is a cute concept on paper. 🙄

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The four horsemen of selling out:

  • Big Pharma

  • Big Oil

  • The military-industrial complex

  • Surveillance tech companies

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 27 points 1 week ago (18 children)

It's not like China is going to stop making weapons if I refuse to make weapons.

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (11 children)

My parents said the same thing about air pollution and carbon emissions

[–] socsa@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I suppose the difference is that a country doesn't just get conquered by force if it stops polluting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Almost all pollution is by industries and not your parents, so...

If anything you could criticize them if they voted to keep the pollution going.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] jfrnz@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doesn’t make you any less responsible when the fruits of your labor are used to murder civilians.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What if I have only ever worked constructively on anti-missile defense systems?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My sib has a friend that constantly criticizes others b/c they marginally contribute to injustices in the world (one example is how a family friend votes that specifically puts others at a disadvantage for affordable housing, making them commute for hours on end). That friend also worked with Purdue Pharmaceuticals defense team during their lawsuit lol

It's crazy to me how so many ppl can be so oblivious to their own hypocrisies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Dan the company man felt loyalty to the corp After 16 years of service and a family to support He actually started to believe the weaponry and chemicals were for national defence 'Cause Danny had a mortgage and a boss to answer to The guilty don't feel guilty, they learn not to.

(The Irrationality of Rationality by NOFX).

[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 week ago

Before I went independent, I made many thousands of parts for General Dynamics up to and including missile housings. It's a shitty feeling.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

If you can get a job for LM, you can get a job somewhere else. If a bit more money persuades you to help build child pulverizing machines, you never had any ethics to begin with.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Selling out being an option for people just means the system is working as intended. People are so poor they are willing to compromise their morals to keep food on the table

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dx1@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (37 children)

I never would. And never have.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck the military complex of this species. I'm gonna build my own aerospace company, mine the asteroid belt, and build my own human habitat. With black jack... And hookers... And universal healthcare...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You gotta enter the building to reach the CEO taps forehead

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

After a history of ethically questionable jobs, I thought I had escaped it into something almost benign where we were only wasting the money of other companies.
Recently we started going balls deep into making AI products, and I feel very uncomfortable with it

[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

ain't no rest for the wicked

[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And money don't grow on trees

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

brah. You will merely break many peoples bodies with explosives in the name of capitalism, corruption and colonization.

At my job I corrupt entire countries full of children, starting at an early age. I run user bucket targetting experiments on them to get them to spend more and steer them to befriend "friends" I select for them to optimize some pennies for our network edge performance. The measurements and manipulation of their vulnerabilities never stops. I take high resolution scans of their faces that we can use for the rest of their life to identify them anywhere--all so they can change their face to be an animated fox face, or stuff like that. I hope authoritarians never get ahold of this info because that could be bad for these consumers/kids, but hopes and prayers are not exactly my job. We never delete their info because parents click through the terms of service to shut their kids up. We say we educate kids to learn to program but inside the company that concept is spoken of mockingly.

I measure and steer their temperament and engagement with new games that are open to their worst impulses, and keep them on the treadmill. I transcribe and save literally every single word they utter. I analyze those spoken words for sentiment, and to build an ongoing model of which bucket they belong in to maximize their spending. The loaner? the helper? the team player? authority truster? authority abuser? rule driven, rule antidriven? I have loot, friends, new games, and contrived self serving "bugs" for all of them to find and think they are exploiting the games without my knowing.

I teach them to get addicted to loot boxes and I arbitrage endorphin hits between their peers and from the game. I give them their entire range of their lifes highs and lows. The best and worst times of their short lives are things I hand out. The later at night it is, or the longer their session, the more loot I give them to keep them playing. Like an IV drip of drug where sometimes you need to squeeze the bag to push more through to feel that hit strongly even when exhausted, and get them to defy their parents' calls for them to sleep.

You think darkness is your issue. But you merely adopted the dark for a paycheck; I was born into it right out of school, moulded by it. I didn't see socially useful internet services till I was an old man, by then it was nothing to me but a different way to drive engagement and raise the value on my rsus. My legacy will be a path of human wreckage and misery, same as yours only much bigger.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] anus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Lots of refreshingly, considered takes on Lemmy today

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Before reading the text I was expecting a Saddam joke. After reading seems even more applicable.

load more comments
view more: next ›