this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
830 points (98.9% liked)

Lefty Memes

4613 readers
1777 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Capitalism fixes everything, duh. Why didn't I realize. I'm so dumb. It's science. Apply capitalism, and bam, nuclear energy.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 minutes ago

There's plenty of countries with cheap insulin, and people there are fine because other treatments for diabetes are cheaper too.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Bullshit take. Some people ONLY respond to insulin. Fuck whoever wrote this.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 42 minutes ago

I apologize if this sounds pedantic, but what if the writer was forced to write it to keep his job along with his family's access to food, shelter, and healthcare? So rather than punch down, I say punch up. I say fuck the owners who ultimately signed off on the article and potentially demanded it in the first place. (The Atlantic is owned by Emerson Collective which is owned by billionaire Laurene Jobs. )

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This was not written by some reach asshole. This was written by someone on the payroll of some rich asshole.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 36 minutes ago

Yes! Without shared ownership over the companies we work at, we have no ownership over how our labor is used. This is why a worker owned economy is such a critical part of Marxism and why Social democracy's attempt to achieve socialist goals through higher taxes and labor rights isn't enough (a golden cage is still a cage.) The heart of socialism is giving people a shared ownership over their labor which means they get a voice and vote on how their labor will be used

[–] dogsoahC@lemm.ee 26 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

Have you read the article? It's about how type 2 patients, for whom insulin isn't the best option and who make up the majority of diabetes patients could end up having to use insulin because it's cheaper.

"In place of capping the out-of-pocket cost of just insulin, lawmakers should cap the out-of-pocket cost of all diabetes medications."

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago

A lot of type two patients need to manage their diets better. You wouldn't believe the number of people who just keep eating like shit.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

for whom diabetes isn't the best option and who make up the ...

I guess you meant to say "insulin is not the best option"? Because diabetes seems like a shit option all around.

[–] dogsoahC@lemm.ee 6 points 5 hours ago

Shhh, now come and sweep yourself under that nice little carpet.

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Better than having nothing which is the current situation.

[–] dogsoahC@lemm.ee 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think the point is that insurances might not pay for the better options as willingly as they do now if there's a cheaper option. But I understand too little of the US healthcare system to be completely sure.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The problems aren’t the treatments, the problems are still the assholes pricing the treatments that exacerbate issues with treatment affordability and selection.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 8 points 15 hours ago

Michael Rose

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 33 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

What’s worse - taking diabetes medication that’s somewhat outdated, or taking no diabetes medication at all?

I’m not a doctor, but I bet I know the answer.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Also most of those newer treatments treat either type 2 (diet / metabolism related) or are an adjunct therapy for a type 1 (genetic) who has also developed insulin resistance over time. With or without insulin resistance a type 1 isn't making any insulin in their pancreas at ALL and is going to need to take manufactured insulin, whether by a syringe or with an artificial pancreas that needs to be filled with an insulin cartridge. For them a metabolism altering medication isn't going to make their pancreas start producing insulin again, it's just going to help their cells respond better to the insulin they still have to inject.

People have gotten so used to conceptualizing diabetes as a "fat people" disease that they completely ignore the type 1 genetic diabetics who are actually the main users of insulin. Oh and most children with diabetes have type 1 (since it's genetic) vs type 2 which can be managed with the fancier newer drugs is the "fat people" / diet related type, and most people don't get that until they're at least middle aged and have been eating garbage for decades. When people talk about insulin they act like they're talking about adults who made a choice when most of your exclusively insulin dependent diabetics are gonna be type 1s who got it from genetics and have had it since childhood.

We should absolutely be caring about people regardless of these moralistic fat shaming arguments but the kind of people saying it's not a big deal that a month of insulin costs $500 are also usually the same people crying "think of the children!" and the raw hypocrisy of that just drives me fucking bonkers.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

Yes. Thank you. I have T1, and with T2 being ~20 times as common, I don’t think the difference will ever be understood by the public. I wish it would get a different name, though that wouldn’t lower the price of insulin, right.

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

YoU jUsT hAvE To WaTcH yOuR DiEt

-them probably

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

yOu juSt hAve To cuT swEetS, maYBe tRY tHe CArniVorE DieT

- them actually

Other times they'll just advise you to use honey, because they think that's not sugar.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Hmm, who is this Rose fellow?

Michael Rose is a senior resident in internal medicine and pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

The only person The Atlantic could find to peddle this shit isn’t even allowed to practice medicine without supervision? lmao

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago

Not even an endocrine doctor. IM knows diabetic medicine because they happen to run into it a fair amount, along with a lot of other diseases from a lot of other body systems like kidney disease or COPD, but they're not nephrologists or pulmonologists either.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

credit to michael rose, they want all diabetes medications to be cheaper or free.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

That’s fair! It’s entirely possible they got rolled by The Atlantic and didn’t know what the editors were going to do to the piece. But like, at the same time maybe question why a national publication would need someone who isn’t able to practice on their own to do an opinion piece about something highly politicized… (them before they agreed to write the piece I mean, if that wasn’t clear)

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 6 hours ago

another comment pointed out elsewhere that the titles are rarely made by the writer, so im inclined to believe that the atlantic recieved this piece and wanted to slant it for those who just read the headline, yeah.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 143 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I hope these motherfuckers and their apologists die.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Luigi doing it! And now u can do…

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Is that Tony Hawk why does that look like Tony Hawk

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

No lmfao that's Tim Robinson 😂😂😂😂

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 116 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you offer the newer, better treatments for free, right? Right???

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

That's the neat part, you don't.

[–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 96 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Except if diabetics had cheap safe access to insulin none of them would die………..

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (8 children)

The point it seems like they are trying to make (and I have only read up till the paywall) is that there are multiple forms of insulin, and newer versions basically work better. Many people are getting the newer, better drugs, but having to ration them because of how expensive they are. If plain, old insulin becomes cheap enough such that people switch to it (critically, without some extra effort by our healthcare system), a percentage of people will end up dying. Managing diabetes is all about keeping blood glucose stable, and that is asier to do with the modern stuff.

They retitled the article to "Making Insulin Cheaper Isn’t Enough", which i think is a much better headline.

And again, I could only read up till the paywall, so i could be giving them too much credit.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

The old forms of insulin (R, NPH) are already cheap and available at Walmart without a prescription. They are only $25 a vial, but suck to use though. Pretty sure they’re referring to the metabolic drugs given to people with type 2.

[–] dogsoahC@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

I didn't have a paywall for some reason, so here's the gist of it:

Insulin is only the first choice for type 1 diabetes. For type 2, there are alternatives (not just variants of insulin, but actually different drugs) with fewer side effects, and which are more effective against the serious dangers like heart attacks. But when insulin gets much cheaper, those patients (i.e. the majority of diabetes patients) could end up using insulin and run a higher risk of those more deadly symptoms. Towards the end, the article even says: "In place of capping the out-of-pocket cost of just insulin, lawmakers should cap the out-of-pocket cost of all diabetes medications."

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe that would motivate pharmaceutical companies to work on treatments that actually cure diabetes?

Seems like are breakthrough treatments we are getting over recent years is just to manage the sickness.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 7 hours ago

Funny how pharmaceutical's motivation to cure doesn't exist.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fact they changed the headline is itself praiseworthy, but the fact it was click bait and sensationalist to begin counters it.

The point about making the older stuff cheaper is something that isn't mentioned as much as it should be in these debates.

Ultimately even if the older stuff is worse and requires more attention and monitoring (less convenient), it is still better than nothing.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone posted a link to the full text. Looks like their main point is that for most people with diabetes (who have type 2), insulin of any form isn't the best first line treatment, things like glp-1 receptor agonists (e.g., ozempic) work way better, but since it's not "insulin" it's not covered.

I'm guessing the editors of the Atlantic gave it the original bad headline, cause it seems like the author is genuine.

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

So the physician cares about patient wellbeing while the newspaper cares about engagement? Sounds about right

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

If diabetics get insulin for free they'd become dependent and require it for the rest of their lives. It's safer to just let them die or leave them homeless because they have to spend all their money on it.

~/s~

[–] FeloniousPunk@lemmy.today 25 points 1 day ago

Any society which holds “your money or your life” as a valid argument is not one which should exist.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The title of the article is clickbait/ragebait. The actual article content is a little different. The gist of it is more so this:

In place of capping the out-of-pocket cost of just insulin, lawmakers should cap the out-of-pocket cost of all diabetes medications.

https://archive.is/tvVHP

Headline writters are often/usually different people than the person who wrote the article leading to infuriating things like this

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

Cheaper medicine?

But at what cost???

[–] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This only makes sense if the new treatments are cheaper or free than insulin. Which I'd bet a body part they aren't.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

Ozempic is expensive af. Even more so than insulin.

load more comments
view more: next ›