this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
118 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6293 readers
63 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 79 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Ok.

He's wrong and we'll all just ignore him and continue existing.

Medical science will continue showing that sex isn't and never has been a binary either.

Laws can't override nature.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Problem is this means that things we were hoping to get like having hormone replacement therapy actually approved by the FDA for use for transgender care will not happen and any enforcement of anti-discrimination or laws against hate speech at the federal level will no longer apply to trans and non-binary people. This will allow, for example, insurance companies to not have to cover transgender care. There is already a huge waiting list for people who are seeking care in the US due to the lack of specialists (myself included), so that list is likely to get longer. And likely any doctors who might have been planning to take up transgender care specialties may have their programs lose their funding. It's a huge impact to a lot of areas of government and many industries to have the federal government not recognize transgender care as valid and not recognize non-binary people like me as people at all.

Also, I'm fortunate enough to live in a state that is friendly to transgender and non-binary people, but my employer is not based here, so the insurance I have doesn't have to obey local laws that don't allow for blanket policies banning coverage of transgender care. So, the federal laws do matter.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 17 points 1 month ago

Thank you for the correction and expansion.

Hoping people will start making their own hormones etc. I understand the rest is shit though and I hope we can all start looking after each other instead.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they could read they’d have some strong feelings about this reality

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The ability to read or not does not have anything to do with how much knowledge one can acquire, there are many ways to acquire knowledge.

Don't be ableist and harm people that don't deserve it please.

These people are just willfully ignorant fascists who think they can control reality

No need to ascribe any other features onto them that don't and won't harm them but will harm others.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s a reference to a joke from King of the Hill.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay, doesn't change it being ableist though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jdnewmil@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Doesn't stop politicians from trying...

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah, it's fine. this is all just political theater and posturing.

just use another name/ term for sex and move on.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago

Or better yet get rid of the whole concept and be specific to body parts etc.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Jfc this is going to affect intersex people more than trans people.

We were just at the cusp of addressing how fucked up fitting intersex people into one of two boxes is.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 56 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I always find it weird that conservatives think this is some kind of gotcha for binary trans people. Like, okay, this is a shitty thing to say to nonbinary or intersex people and is both untrue and cruel. But how is this relevant to me, a binary trans woman?

Like.. hello my gender isn't 'trans', it's 'woman'. Idiots.

[–] dragonfucker 26 points 1 month ago

First they came for the enbies

[–] vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In fairness part of the decree is that it also can't be changed, so definitely still an impact to both binary and nonbinary trans folks. Also love the downplay of enby impacts, if it doesn't impact you it doesn't matter?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

From the article:

The definition of male and female will be based on whether people are born with eggs or sperm, rather than on their chromosomes.

What did you say your gender was?

[–] millie@beehaw.org 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well nobody is born with sperm so..

[–] Aaron 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] millie@beehaw.org 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True Feminism means acknowledging that women can be just as fallible as men.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

How do they confirm that? Surgery?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He's probably going to sign an order to make everyone be nice to him next.

Yes, unironically.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

The "respect my authorta" bill

[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is an executive order, not a law. That doesn't make it any less terrible, however. Those commenting it is just political posturing are seriously misinformed at the wide range and scope this action will (not might, not could, WILL) have on you. Anything even tangentially related to getting work done, grants made, research funded with the federal government will be effected. In brief, the scope and impact of an executive order can vary greatly depending on the specific issue and the details of the order itself. This one will likely be meant to ensure that grant making, contracts, research, and legal recourse for those not subscribing to it's narrow and, frankly, archaic definitions will have a very difficult time interacting with the federal government in a variety of ways. But again, we are entering uncharted territory where the legislative, judicial, and executive are now all openly corrupt and willing to harm and hinder rather than help people.

I don't think the general public realizes the sheer insanity of the new government and their willingness to go far to harm people they don't like or don't agree with. Therein lies the real danger. How this EO will be interpreted and executed across the executive branch will be purposefully cruel and targeted. With the recent spat of boot licking in SCOTUS, I fear we're all in for a world of hurt. I'm just an ally, and I'm telling you that you absolutely must not bury your head in the sand on this one. You have to find ways to either protect yourself or protest/contest in a way you deem necessary for your health and well-being. Even a simple act of protest can mean a world of difference to those who are and will suffer.

The only bright side is an Executive Order ONLY effects federal branches of government under authority of the President. They can be undone by future presidents and challenged/overturned after judicial review. Remember the "Muslim ban?" That was one example.

So please, I beg you, do not brush this off as a Trumpism. This is meant to unleash the powers of hate, ignorance, and brutality that will latch onto as permission to be complete assholes.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] chloyster@beehaw.org 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Many hugs. We'll get through this.

[–] Aaron 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Find community. Meet in person regularly if you can. Just existing in community is huge, if for nothing else than your own emotional, mental, and physical health. We are thinking of you all from outside the US 🫂

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is he gonna sign one to abolish gravity too?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He'll sign one that there are only four elements: Fire, Earth, Air, and Water.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

A post about sex determination that seems relevant.

https://beehaw.org/post/15996092

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Crazy complexity and that diagram is just about the genitals

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 month ago

I'm thinking trump and the Republican party are really bad, like cruel and stupid bad, and maybe we shouldn't let them give orders anymore.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Legal laws can't change scientifically established theory. If he wants to do some unbiased research though...

...he'd probably prove himself wrong

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

this will more than likely get dragged through the courts for the entire term by multiple cases.

plus there's all the legislation that would have to be rewritten or repealed to support this 'policy', that would never get through congress without a larger moron majority than exists currently.

[–] Odys@beehaw.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm a straight old white male European, so hope you don't mind me posting here. I'm just curious about what impact this will have? It seems to me, that "freedom of speech" can easily be interpreted that it's ok to hate non straight people? Medical treatments might be impaired as well? Also: hate groups like Proud boys and White Lives Matter might very well feel emboldened to get violent, certainly after Elons "gesture". As a European, I fear the worst as this crap looks extremely familiar. What are your thoughts/expectations/fears?

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First of all, you're absolutely welcome to post here as an ally.

Secondly, I found an informative article on thr queer news website them which explained everything:

[Link]

The order, titled "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” was one of more than 200 executive actions Trump issued on the first day of his second term, [...] disbanding federal programs on diversity, equity, and inclusion. [...] the document seeks to redefine gender at the federal level, erase recognition of trans people in government communications, cease the issuance of gender-corrected U.S. passports, bar incarcerated trans women from being housed in women’s prisons, deny gender-affirming medical care to trans inmates, embolden transphobia in the workplace, and block federal dollars from being used to “promote gender ideology.”

I live in the UK, so I only know what I'm being told, but the situation looks pretty dire over there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The article title is misleading. It's true that there are only two sexes, but Trump's order is concerning gender, which is a spectrum.

[–] Sas@beehaw.org 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Intersex people popping out of existence upon reading your comment

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Male and female are the only sexes; intersex is just a blanket term for various medical conditions that describe abnormal development of sex characteristics.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's natural and harmless to have any combination of male and female sexual characteristics, even if it's uncommon. It's only considered medical condition because we decided it was.

My friend has a uterus and gonads. I have red hair and blue eyes. Both are super uncommon and neither has caused us any trouble, that's just how we're made.

I'd argue that male and female are just names for the ends of the spectrum.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dragonfucker 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So you're saying if you call a sex abnormal, it doesn't exist?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

And some of them are not obviously male or female from birth, but are given surgeries to force them into one or the other. Sometimes they get it wrong.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There are scientifically more than two sexes. Something like 1-2% of all people are intersex.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They will call it "multisex" and come up with treatments to "fix" the "medical issue".

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

They already do that with the more obviously intersex children at birth.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›