this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
116 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6235 readers
146 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

I mean there’s male, female, and intersex who make up less than 1% of the population. Nothing about gender. This isn’t the flex trump thinks it is…

[–] Odys@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a straight old white male European, so hope you don't mind me posting here. I'm just curious about what impact this will have? It seems to me, that "freedom of speech" can easily be interpreted that it's ok to hate non straight people? Medical treatments might be impaired as well? Also: hate groups like Proud boys and White Lives Matter might very well feel emboldened to get violent, certainly after Elons "gesture". As a European, I fear the worst as this crap looks extremely familiar. What are your thoughts/expectations/fears?

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First of all, you're absolutely welcome to post here as an ally.

Secondly, I found an informative article on thr queer news website them which explained everything:

[Link]

The order, titled "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” was one of more than 200 executive actions Trump issued on the first day of his second term, [...] disbanding federal programs on diversity, equity, and inclusion. [...] the document seeks to redefine gender at the federal level, erase recognition of trans people in government communications, cease the issuance of gender-corrected U.S. passports, bar incarcerated trans women from being housed in women’s prisons, deny gender-affirming medical care to trans inmates, embolden transphobia in the workplace, and block federal dollars from being used to “promote gender ideology.”

I live in the UK, so I only know what I'm being told, but the situation looks pretty dire over there.

[–] Odys@beehaw.org 2 points 19 hours ago

Thanks, doesn't sound good at all. There is lots of worrying that Elons billions will enable him to push the extreme right wing political parties with similar views here in Europe. Some think this will be a great thing, but luckily they are still a minority at the moment. But for how long? Take care people, as I expect groups like the Proud Boys will harass you and get away with it.

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A post about sex determination that seems relevant.

https://beehaw.org/post/15996092

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Crazy complexity and that diagram is just about the genitals

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you make that? That's genius I'm sharing that.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 23 hours ago

Heh, yeah. Probably could be better, but share away!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] millie@beehaw.org 55 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I always find it weird that conservatives think this is some kind of gotcha for binary trans people. Like, okay, this is a shitty thing to say to nonbinary or intersex people and is both untrue and cruel. But how is this relevant to me, a binary trans woman?

Like.. hello my gender isn't 'trans', it's 'woman'. Idiots.

[–] TanyaJLaird@beehaw.org 2 points 16 hours ago

And even then, it goes beyond gender. Even the idea that you can't change your sex is laughable. "Sex," despite what some TERFs insist, is not traditionally or in practice today determined by DNA. We've learned that chromosomes play a primary factor in determining sex, but your sex isn't your DNA. A blueprint isn't a house; a house is a house. The blueprint just tells you how to build a house.

Physical sex is really about primary and secondary sex characteristics. If a trans woman undergoes SRS for example, her sex is literally female. She has the same anatomy as an infertile woman, or woman whose had a hysterectomy.

And this is the traditional way of defining sex. We referred to people's "sex" for generations prior to discovering DNA. And even today, we sex infants entirely based on their genitalia. Actual genetic screening is incredibly rare.

Bigots just latch onto "sex==genetics" because it allows them an easy cudgel. But in reality, if your primary and secondary sex characteristics are of a certain sex, you are that sex. Does the initial cellular blueprint indicate a different sex? Assuming you're not intersex, sure. But again, DNA is just a blueprint.

The example I always like is the house/boat example. Imagine you owned a wooden boat. That boat was made by a particularly prideful boat builder, and every plank of the boat is stamped, "Smith's shipbuilding co." One day you get tired of sailing the waves, so you take your boat, disassemble it, and use the planks to build a house. You now live in a house where every board is stamped "Smith's shipbuilding co."

Imagine the absurdity of someone coming to your home and telling you, "you live in a boat! Every board clearly labels this building as a boat. Therefore, you must live in a boat."

That is the fallacy of relying on genetics to define sex. Chromosomes are just the initial blueprints or the equivalent of the "Smith shipbuilding co." stamp.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

It’s only shitty to intersex people, non-binary is a gender not a sex.

[–] dragonfucker 25 points 2 days ago

First they came for the enbies

[–] vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In fairness part of the decree is that it also can't be changed, so definitely still an impact to both binary and nonbinary trans folks. Also love the downplay of enby impacts, if it doesn't impact you it doesn't matter?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

From the article:

The definition of male and female will be based on whether people are born with eggs or sperm, rather than on their chromosomes.

What did you say your gender was?

[–] millie@beehaw.org 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well nobody is born with sperm so..

[–] Aaron 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] millie@beehaw.org 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 77 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Ok.

He's wrong and we'll all just ignore him and continue existing.

Medical science will continue showing that sex isn't and never has been a binary either.

Laws can't override nature.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Problem is this means that things we were hoping to get like having hormone replacement therapy actually approved by the FDA for use for transgender care will not happen and any enforcement of anti-discrimination or laws against hate speech at the federal level will no longer apply to trans and non-binary people. This will allow, for example, insurance companies to not have to cover transgender care. There is already a huge waiting list for people who are seeking care in the US due to the lack of specialists (myself included), so that list is likely to get longer. And likely any doctors who might have been planning to take up transgender care specialties may have their programs lose their funding. It's a huge impact to a lot of areas of government and many industries to have the federal government not recognize transgender care as valid and not recognize non-binary people like me as people at all.

Also, I'm fortunate enough to live in a state that is friendly to transgender and non-binary people, but my employer is not based here, so the insurance I have doesn't have to obey local laws that don't allow for blanket policies banning coverage of transgender care. So, the federal laws do matter.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 17 points 2 days ago

Thank you for the correction and expansion.

Hoping people will start making their own hormones etc. I understand the rest is shit though and I hope we can all start looking after each other instead.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Jfc this is going to affect intersex people more than trans people.

We were just at the cusp of addressing how fucked up fitting intersex people into one of two boxes is.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Is he gonna sign one to abolish gravity too?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He'll sign one that there are only four elements: Fire, Earth, Air, and Water.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But what's his stance on the Humors?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

By executive order Humors are illegal to stop people laughing at him.

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

He should sign one that says the flag was at absolutely, definitely not at half mast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 2 days ago

I'm thinking trump and the Republican party are really bad, like cruel and stupid bad, and maybe we shouldn't let them give orders anymore.

[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is an executive order, not a law. That doesn't make it any less terrible, however. Those commenting it is just political posturing are seriously misinformed at the wide range and scope this action will (not might, not could, WILL) have on you. Anything even tangentially related to getting work done, grants made, research funded with the federal government will be effected. In brief, the scope and impact of an executive order can vary greatly depending on the specific issue and the details of the order itself. This one will likely be meant to ensure that grant making, contracts, research, and legal recourse for those not subscribing to it's narrow and, frankly, archaic definitions will have a very difficult time interacting with the federal government in a variety of ways. But again, we are entering uncharted territory where the legislative, judicial, and executive are now all openly corrupt and willing to harm and hinder rather than help people.

I don't think the general public realizes the sheer insanity of the new government and their willingness to go far to harm people they don't like or don't agree with. Therein lies the real danger. How this EO will be interpreted and executed across the executive branch will be purposefully cruel and targeted. With the recent spat of boot licking in SCOTUS, I fear we're all in for a world of hurt. I'm just an ally, and I'm telling you that you absolutely must not bury your head in the sand on this one. You have to find ways to either protect yourself or protest/contest in a way you deem necessary for your health and well-being. Even a simple act of protest can mean a world of difference to those who are and will suffer.

The only bright side is an Executive Order ONLY effects federal branches of government under authority of the President. They can be undone by future presidents and challenged/overturned after judicial review. Remember the "Muslim ban?" That was one example.

So please, I beg you, do not brush this off as a Trumpism. This is meant to unleash the powers of hate, ignorance, and brutality that will latch onto as permission to be complete assholes.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He's probably going to sign an order to make everyone be nice to him next.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Aaron 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Find community. Meet in person regularly if you can. Just existing in community is huge, if for nothing else than your own emotional, mental, and physical health. We are thinking of you all from outside the US 🫂

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My workplace's LGBT resource group is meeting soon. Hoping for good news. I'm wondering why I still live in the US at this point - I have no living family or close friends here and work in an in-demand field. May as well sell my house and move somewhere that I'm welcome.

[–] Aaron 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would suggest you look into it, at the very least! Leaving was the best decision I ever made.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

May I ask what country you went to? The options are staggering.

[–] Aaron 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

New Zealand! It's not perfect, but with a population of only 5 million, we do a lot better taking care of each other. I live on the south island, so it's even smaller. We have a fairly conservative govt right now, just like most places the economic downturn encouraged a right shift, but the culture here has been very progressive historically, and the people still are. I feel much more hopeful pushing back on hate here than I did in Texas, and it feels like it's impactful as opposed to in the US where it feels like pushing back against a river.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

NZ is actually at the top of my list! Would you go as far as recommending it for a US expat?

[–] Aaron 2 points 1 day ago

Absolutely. It's not a utopia, but it's a huge step up from the US.

[–] chloyster@beehaw.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›