this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
840 points (88.5% liked)

Political Memes

5876 readers
3236 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

It's nice of you to leal to Israel but that's not what I was referring to.

There's other policies that the Democrats could have absolutely pushed for. For instance reinstating the protection plans under the American relief plan that they allowed to expire in 2022. You know the thing they said massively reduce child poverty only for it to go immediately back up when those protections ended. I feel like that would have been a great place for the Dems to start. We're talking basic fucking things like a Band-Aid fix on Healthcare would be enough to mobilize the base but they're not even willing to do that. Kamalas pathetic approach to Home Care was to give first-time home buyers $12,000. This is stupid because nobody can afford a house or get the mortgage for the house because the banks aren't satisfied with their debt to income ratio. Nothing about dealing with rent nothing about promising that linacon would stay on. Nothing about dealing with that internet driven rent demand bullshit from that company called real price. These aren't leftist points either just broad liberal points.

[–] FediNeko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 6 days ago

Coworker: "I hate trump, he should never be president!" Me: "So you're voting Harris?" Coworker: "I don't know if we're ready for a WoMaN president"

Asking for a friend, where is the nearest cliff? He would like to go jump off of it.

[–] nomoyknsss@endlesstalk.org 17 points 5 days ago
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago

Good thing they got rid of Genocide Joe to pave the way Death dealing Donny

[–] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 34 points 6 days ago (16 children)

Maybe the political party should have conformed to the pressure of the people who vote in its party. Just saying.

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Dems would rather lose than appeal to what americans actually want.

Also funny to imagine protest voters being powerful enough to sway the election but not powerful enough for Dems to listen to

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 29 points 6 days ago (7 children)

If only they'd put this much effort into getting one person to change her mind on the issue, instead of trying to get 10 million people to change their morals.

It appears especially ghoulish now after it came out that even her campaign's polling showed that it was a losing position.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (28 children)

The Protest Vote Paradox™

As we’ve all read time after time in the months leading up to the election, the Protest Vote™ simply states states that:

“We refuse to vote against a Tyrant-Felon in order to send a clear and concise message that we will not stand for [roll D20 for random popular single issue], and alongside our refusal to vote against the Tyrant-Felon, is a collective hope that the aforementioned clear and concise message- if ignored, is received under unmitigated duress!”

-Cut to Tyrant-Felon’s win, and the aftermath:

Wether observed or not, the behavior of the Protest Voter will attempt to achieve the following:
• Obnoxiously tell everyone “We told you all what would happen!”
• Claim there is “No way protest voting could cause trump to win.”

As both of these options cannot simultaneously be true in the same reality without breaking important time-space things that we would probably prefer not be broken- we are left with only a few logical conclusions:

  1. Protest voters have no idea what they’re talking about.
  2. Protest voters don’t understand the concept of hypocrisy.
  3. Protest voters have somehow learned to defy reality and become exempt from the concept of paradoxes, thus creating an entirely new study of theoretical science, known as Bulletproof Symbiotic Hypocrisy Theory, or BLsHt.

Something, something, something Ted Talk.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago (7 children)

You forgot that they will also claim that it is the fault of the opposition to fascism party that they didn't "convince them to vote for them" even though they had already made up their mind ages before the election even started that they would never vote for the opposition to fascism party because they don't actually care about [popular single issue] or stopping fascists. They just want to feel like special little snowflakes who are part of the "revolution" and want to see the whole system destroyed and the violence that goes along with it because they're simply bored.

See the other reply for a perfect example.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 40 points 6 days ago

Trump claiming credit for ceasefire and then destroying the region was always Bibi's plan. The propalestine protestors were against the administration for refusing to acknowledge that the israeli's were not negotiating in good faith. Had they played hard ball things might have been different.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Reminder that the West Bank is the one that's not even ruled by Hamas and hasn't attacked Israel. If Israel tried to do this under Harris, no doubt weapons would've been cut off and the US might have even favored sanctions.

[–] nomoyknsss@endlesstalk.org 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Ah yeah she draw the line at killing the wrong kind of arabs /s so brave

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Lol why? Gaza is illegally occupied too.

Thousands of dead babies wasn't enough for her or Biden. Rafah was a red line apparently and now Rafah doesn't exist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

FAFO! Big time. Bunch of idiots. They do not understand that Israel has the USA by the balls and this has been going on since the USS Liberty.

[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Finally I can stop wondering how the protest voters handle aiding and completing a genocide while claiming to have any sense of morality at all.

They ignore it because they never cared, that's IT! NOTHING ELSE. ITS ALWAYS SOMEONE ELSES FAULT BECAUSE OF THEIR NARCISSISM.

[–] nomoyknsss@endlesstalk.org 6 points 5 days ago

They ignore it because they never cared,

A friend of mine died in Lebannon.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

What does that make the people who voted for the genocide the first time around and still failed to get their person re elected?

Is it possible that a lot of protest voters had family who were bombed and that's why they care?

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›