this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
331 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

61227 readers
4498 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lofgren's bill would impose site-blocking requirements on broadband providers with at least 100,000 subscribers and providers of public domain name resolution services with annual revenue of over $100 million. The bill has exemptions for VPN services and "similar services that encrypt and route user traffic through intermediary servers"; DNS providers that offer service "exclusively through encrypted DNS protocols"; and operators of premises that provide Internet access, like coffee shops, bookstores, airlines, and universities.

Invest in VPN providers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

its uh, definitely one of the feelings of all time reading through threads like this, assuming these are actual real people, spending their actually real time, talking about these actually real things.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 24 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Sometimes I feel like democrats don't actually care more about voters, they just care much more about appearances.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Idk man, that sounds like evidence based thinking to me, reported.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

And rich people

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Why would you not quote the first paragraph that explains everything about the law?

US Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) today proposed a law that would let copyright owners obtain court orders requiring Internet service providers to block access to foreign piracy websites. The bill would also force DNS providers to block sites.

TBH it's not that bad since it doesn't affect VPNs or domestic piracy sites, ironically. It's bad but it's not the apocalypse like some other commenters suggest.

[–] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Just a step in the direction towards that, though. They'll pass it, and people will still pirate. Then, they'll claim the legislation wasn't enough and pass another bill further encroaching on our freedom on the internet.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe, but for now she doesn't have a single co-sponsor. LINK TO THE BILL

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that this dumb bitch is trying to do this, a blatant violation of open internet ideas btw, as the technocracy makes its opening moves is the real problem.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure where you've been hiding but Net Neutrality got struck down when we voted Fascists into power, so maybe cool it with blaming the dems for that one, pal.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I'm only blaming the Dems that support and author the decline.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

When you forgot to educate your people well enough so you don't have to worry about what they see.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Don't settle for half measures.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 55 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats: why won't anyone vote for us?

Also Democrats: let's be like the Republicans, they get so many votes! Let's miss the entire point of democracy and just support large companies!

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago

Because they want the big money donors more than they want to win. Their campaigns are above all designed to bring in money for the high-priced consultants.

[–] airportline@lemmy.ml 87 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Trump is president and this is their priority?

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 18 hours ago

Of course it is, what else would you expect from the controlled opposition party?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 16 hours ago

Why wouldn't it be? People's interests don't bring in money

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 48 points 18 hours ago

Democrats once again losing on purpose.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

These people were everyone's hope? LMAO 🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

This is some fascist (& not at all surprising) shit.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Cockroaches using the government to make oppressive laws. I think I'm still ancap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 39 points 19 hours ago

Even out of power they still find a way to give hand jobs for industry donations and casually screw the public. I admire their energy.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

Fuck. How bad is this...??

Is this going to take out VPNs as well?

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The country is being burned to the ground from the inside by fascists, and this is the hill Democrat politicians choose to die on?!! Holy shit! What a fucking joke!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Corporate dictatorship masquerading as "democracy"

[–] labbbb2@thelemmy.club 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I don't think it's even corporate now. There are oligopolies/monopolies in each sector already

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

The shepherd and the dog might be in agreement.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 46 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

77 year old who has been in the house since the 90s. Actually a prime example of why we need term limits and real competition in elections (if not from GOP, at least in primaries). Irony is she reps a district that isn't really associated with streaming or producing movies.

My guess? She won her primary because she was the incombent or was unopposed, but she probably receives cash from the film industry. Almost all house seats are uncompetitive unless someone drops out or gets redistricted. Until something changes, this is and will be the way our government continues to work.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

in power since the 90s

Oh so carrying the torch for the LAST time they tried to go after media with the moral panic of "Explicit" music label stuff led by Tipper Gore? The one where Twisted Sister showed up in 1985. A continuation from when they had a panic about VHS recordings in 1969 and Mr Rogers testified.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I specially went Obama over Clinton because she was still saying in 2008 how video games promote violence. There's a certain type of Dem, and they're still ramming them down our throats.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I swear. The harder they mess with this type of stuff the more single-issue-voters it pushes to vote against them. This war on media is such a losing battle I don't understand why they're opting to wage it with the current fish on the grill. This kind of unpopular legislation is stuff you try and push when you're in power, and try to sell it as an "eat your veggies" moment. Rebranding while they're down certainly makes for an interesting conversation when they rubber band back into power and say "we've said we were gonna do this since 2025" type conversation.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If they are not blocking the access to the WHO.is servers you can get the IP address of the site and add it to your local hosts file.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't the IP address change anyway?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 137 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Democrats: "Please for the love of God, don't vote for us ever again! We really, really don't want to win."

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago

Lemmy: "Fuck that, I'll vote blue no matter who. You can't tell me what to do"

Democrats:

[–] fafferlicious@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

D E M O C R A T singular, one. Not democrats. For fucks sake it's on the bloody title!

Why are people so willfully ignorant?

US Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) today proposed ...

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

From California? Hmmm... Why would a representative from California put forward such a bill?

[–] Vinstaal0@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Cause people fail to awknowledge there is more to politics than just left and right, or progressive and conservative, etc.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

So it help vpn stocks?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 144 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Really uh...

Setting themselves up for success uh..

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Great to see our representatives finally focusing on the real issues in these difficult times.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

TBH they can't really pass anything even if they wanted to focus on more important issues. Majority Leaders call votes and they're both Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)

Lofgren is a corporate stooge is the message I'm getting.

load more comments
view more: next ›