So many mission statements will be lost when they accidentally delete everything containing the word "transparent."
Technology
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
The USGS has renamed "jadeite" to "jate".
Ministry of truth
If it's still in git, then it's not actually purged. Nobody tell the fash.
One of the Muskrat's kits will undoubtedly tell him sooner or later. Then Github'll get a takedown order.
Dropped branches get all their commit trees purged, unless the commits are also part of another branch.
First they came for the "master" branch name, but I didn't care what the "reference" branch was called.
Then they came for "blacklist", and while it was a BS mixup with the "black book", I didn't really care what the "deny/allow list" was called.
Now they're coming for "Remove-DEI" and "forbidden words"... and they're pushing it as a bigoted administrative mandate using the same censoring procedures in overdrive.
I wonder how many software devs and admins now weigh their morals. And how many reject to implement or not.
Can't imagine many. Many didn't have issues with 2016's Cambridge Analytics shenanigans and with how their apps ignored queer and brown people being habitually targeted over the years. I've met a few "liberal" software devs here in LA and they're at the same level of insufferable as gentrifying real estate agents. Sigh.
I dont understand.
The US government is using public git repos as a database? Huh?